Since this is the place for GG crap, I mean interesting things... here's a link to an
opinion piece in the WaPo.
You guys can start high-fiving each other now!
People are frustrated and can't control themselves, so instead of ignoring them they harass them. Surely we'll reach an equilibrium eventually where we won't have people like that #cancelcolbert woman talking so much shit in the media, and then we'll have less harassment?
Surely they can't all be ridiculous? I've only seen a handful but they seem to be almost trolling. That woman the article leads with wrote,
“What’s the difference between venerating women for being fuckable and putting them on a purity pedestal? In both cases, women’s worth is contingent upon their ability to please men and to shape their sexual identities around what men want.
http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/222118.Jessica_Valenti
Why ask about a
difference and then proceed with a
similarity, as if that's likely to lead to a valid conclusion. She only has a few premises to work with here. Since it's not valid, it can't be worth anything as a statement, surely?
There are are least three contingencies: the contingency of purity, fuckability, and... we'll call it "general worth." In order to be pure you need to be pure (that's the only contingency, however you want to measure it, virginity or whatever). In order to be fuckable, err, i guess someone needs to have you as the
object of lust or something, and finally... oh.. well... you can't really quantify what someone is worth, because that's ridiculous.
in before an irrational person brings up the bolded. It's the same as using the female jamba juice employee as on object of your smoothie addiction, or the concept of women as objects in these or any other sentences. These ideas aren't what form our opinions about what women are "worth" because that's silly. It's just noise. in before "no this is noise."