#Gamergate, the war on nerds, and the corruption of the left and the free press

[Nebor]

Especially a woman that feels slighted.

Men argue logically, with the a goal of coming a mutually agreeable conclusion. Women argue emotionally, to vent, often just for the sake of arguing.

P&N is 90% women.

 

[Subyman]

Men argue logically, with the a goal of coming a mutually agreeable conclusion. Women argue emotionally, to vent, often just for the sake of arguing.

P&N is 90% women.

90% are boys.

 

[CitizenKain]

...then she uses the opportunity to sieze more power for her organization and entire gender, place even more burden and restrictions on the male gender, and gain a nice wad of cash for herself. A few tears along the way speed the process along nicely.

Ahh yes, all the power she seized like: , and . Can't forget : .

What is it like inventing a world view where you are somehow under great persecution? Better call in some more threats to her and show her who is really boss, that way she can understand the true horror.

 

[Blue_Max]

Men argue logically, with the a goal of coming a mutually agreeable conclusion. Women argue emotionally, to vent, often just for the sake of arguing.

P&N is 90% women.

Ahh yes, all the power she seized like: , and . Can't forget : .

What is it like inventing a world view where you are somehow under great persecution? Better call in some more threats to her and show her who is really boss, that way she can understand the true horror.

Perfect quotes going together.

You say women are the persecuted ones? Call the police in a domestic situation; even if the woman is holding a bloodied frying pan, they'll still pull in the bleeding man first. Go to family court and see who gets... well, pretty much everything. House. Money. Kids. All hers.

Then you go and imply that by pointing out the actions of these rotten power-hungry political feminists, that I'm: A.) a misogynistic woman-squasher, and, B.) one of those handful of people sending troll e-threats.

Total logic... no emotional arguments at alllllll.

 

[brycejones]

Then you go and imply that by pointing out the actions of these rotten power-hungry political feminists, that I'm: A.) a misogynistic woman-squasher, and, B.) one of those handful of people sending troll e-threats.

Total logic... no emotional arguments at alllllll.

Oh the irony........

 

[CitizenKain]

Perfect quotes going together.

You say women are the persecuted ones? Call the police in a domestic situation; even if the woman is holding a bloodied frying pan, they'll still pull in the bleeding man first. Go to family court and see who gets... well, pretty much everything. House. Money. Kids. All hers.

Then you go and imply that by pointing out the actions of these rotten power-hungry political feminists, that I'm: A.) a misogynistic woman-squasher, and, B.) one of those handful of people sending troll e-threats.

Total logic... no emotional arguments at alllllll.

Let us know how many domestic disturbance calls end up going that way.

You still haven't shown what power these rotten power-hungry political feminists have seized. If you aren't someone who is A or B, then why did you join a group that is entirely about those?

 

[Subyman]

Let us know how many domestic disturbance calls end up going that way.

You still haven't shown what power these rotten power-hungry political feminists have seized. If you aren't someone who is A or B, then why did you join a group that is entirely about those?

Yup, gotta love a hypothetical story made up to support the opinion of the one fabricating the story.

 

[Blue_Max]

Let us know how many domestic disturbance calls end up going that way.

You still haven't shown what power these rotten power-hungry political feminists have seized. If you aren't someone who is A or B, then why did you join a group that is entirely about those?

Yup, gotta love a hypothetical story made up to support the opinion of the one fabricating the story.

...except that it's not. Where I work, I get to see this stuff EVERY DAY. First hand. We get just about as many awful women doing terrible, violent, or stupid things as the men are.

I've also been deeply involved with family courts for years fighting for more time with my kids. The stuff I've uncovered representing myself (and succeeding a little more each time) would make your head spin. I certainly wasn't surprised to learn that a panel of feminists was appointed to approve/deny any changes to the the family law system, very much the opposite of the "old boys' club" most feminists claim the judicial system is.

So my knowledge not only comes from research, but from personal and observed real-world experiences. That handily beats anything repeated in coffee shops and feminist recruiting... er "Gender Studies" in colleges.

 

[BoberFett]

Let us know how many domestic disturbance calls end up going that way.

You still haven't shown what power these rotten power-hungry political feminists have seized. If you aren't someone who is A or B, then why did you join a group that is entirely about those?

Yup, gotta love a hypothetical story made up to support the opinion of the one fabricating the story.

This thread has gone full retard, but you are familiar with the Duluth Model, are you not? Surely you'd want to understand what you're talking about before making uninformed comments that reveal your complete ignorance.

 

[Jaskalas]

This thread has gone full retard...

That means it's on topic.

 

[Subyman]

This thread has gone full retard, but you are familiar with the Duluth Model, are you not? Surely you'd want to understand what you're talking about before making uninformed comments that reveal your complete ignorance.

Hmmm, I was clearly talking about his made up story about a bloody frying pan. His follow up post does a better job at making his point.

 

[Blue_Max]

Hmmm, I was clearly talking about his made up story about a bloody frying pan. His follow up post does a better job at making his point.

There we go. Your adversary make a good point? Just call him a liar and make fun of him! Instant winnaaaaarrrr!!

 

[fskimospy]

...except that it's not. Where I work, I get to see this stuff EVERY DAY. First hand. We get just about as many awful women doing terrible, violent, or stupid things as the men are.

I've also been deeply involved with family courts for years fighting for more time with my kids. The stuff I've uncovered representing myself (and succeeding a little more each time) would make your head spin. I certainly wasn't surprised to learn that a panel of feminists was appointed to approve/deny any changes to the the family law system, very much the opposite of the "old boys' club" most feminists claim the judicial system is.

So my knowledge not only comes from research, but from personal and observed real-world experiences. That handily beats anything repeated in coffee shops and feminist recruiting... er "Gender Studies" in colleges.

At least we know why you are so overcome with hatred for women now, a messy divorce.

Did you know that in cases where fathers actively seek custody of their children they get it half the time or more? Crazy, huh?!? You're way too emotionally invested in the issue to look at the evidence rationally though I bet.

 

[Subyman]

There we go. Your adversary make a good point? Just call him a liar and make fun of him! Instant winnaaaaarrrr!!

Adversary? So the bloody frying pan story is true? I'll certainly eat crow if that is a true story.

 

[Blue_Max]

At least we know why you are so overcome with hatred for women now, a messy divorce.

Awfully convenient of you to make shit up whenever you need to. I don't hate women at all; only delusional, greedy feminists out to gain for themselves using terrible tactics like deception, shaming and humongous double-standards.

Did you know that in cases where fathers actively seek custody of their children they get it half the time or more? Crazy, huh?!? You're way too emotionally invested in the issue to look at the evidence rationally though I bet.

Now I know you're delusional. Every stat in north america proves you dead wrong regarding child custody. Dads almost never get that kind of custody. Most of the time, mom is named primary guardian and dad is given "shared custody" which sounds nice, but in practice could be as little as an hour a week. If she decides to not abide by the court decision there's almost never any penalty for her. If he falls behind on child support payments, he'll go to jail.

Real equal. Only twelve times more.

http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/fl-lf/famil/stat2000/p4.html

Custody
Table 5 shows who received custody of the children and the type of contact that was maintained with the non-custodial parent in cases where the parents said they had a court order.

Table 5: Court-Ordered Custody Arrangement, According to
the Age of the Child at Separation and the Type of Broken Union-NLSCY, Cycle 1, 1994-1995

Mother Exclusive Custody Father Exclusive Custody Shared Physical Custody Other Total N 1
(%)
Canada 79.3 6.6 12.8 1.2 100 1239

 

[brycejones]

...except that it's not. Where I work, I get to see this stuff EVERY DAY. First hand. We get just about as many awful women doing terrible, violent, or stupid things as the men are.

I've also been deeply involved with family courts for years fighting for more time with my kids. The stuff I've uncovered representing myself (and succeeding a little more each time) would make your head spin. I certainly wasn't surprised to learn that a panel of feminists was appointed to approve/deny any changes to the the family law system, very much the opposite of the "old boys' club" most feminists claim the judicial system is.

So my knowledge not only comes from research, but from personal and observed real-world experiences. That handily beats anything repeated in coffee shops and feminist recruiting... er "Gender Studies" in colleges.

You and Texas Hiker should form a support group. Have Nehlam speak to you both as a guest speaker about the evils of women.

 

[fskimospy]

Awfully convenient of you to make shit up whenever you need to. I don't hate women at all; only delusional, greedy feminists out to gain for themselves using terrible tactics like deception, shaming and humongous double-standards.

Haha yeah, only those. Guy, you're sick in the head. I understand that a messy divorce is a traumatic event but you've lost it. This level of vitriol and seething hatred for women is not healthy. Seek professional help.

Now I know you're delusional. Every stat in north america proves you dead wrong regarding child custody. Dads almost never get that kind of custody. Most of the time, mom is named primary guardian and dad is given "shared custody" which sounds nice, but in practice could be as little as an hour a week. If she decides to not abide by the court decision there's almost never any penalty for her. If he falls behind on child support payments, he'll go to jail.

Real equal. Only twelve times more.

http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/fl-lf/famil/stat2000/p4.html

Custody
Table 5 shows who received custody of the children and the type of contact that was maintained with the non-custodial parent in cases where the parents said they had a court order.

Table 5: Court-Ordered Custody Arrangement, According to
the Age of the Child at Separation and the Type of Broken Union-NLSCY, Cycle 1, 1994-1995

Mother Exclusive Custody Father Exclusive Custody Shared Physical Custody Other Total N 1
(%)
Canada 79.3 6.6 12.8 1.2 100 1239

Actually you're delusional. Not only are you citing Canadian legal stats, but you're citing all custody arrangements, not contested ones. I'm talking about custody arrangements where the parents don't come to an agreement on their own but rely on the court for judgment. Ie: when the family court actually has to make a decision.

From the MA Supreme Court:

http://amptoons.com/blog/files/Massachusetts_Gender_Bias_Study.htm

We began our investigation of child custody aware of a common perception that there is a bias in favor of women in these decisions. Our research contradicted this perception. Although mothers more frequently get primary physical custody of children following divorce, this practice does not reflect bias but rather the agreement of the parties and the fact that, in most families, mothers have been the primary [*748] caretakers of children. Fathers who actively seek custody obtain either primary or joint physical custody over 70% of the time. Reports indicate, however, that in some cases perceptions of gender bias may discourage fathers from seeking custody and stereotypes about fathers may sometimes affect case outcomes. In general, our evidence suggests that the courts hold higher standards for mothers than fathers in custody determinations.

 

[Blue_Max]

Haha yeah, only those. Guy, you're sick in the head. I understand that a messy divorce is a traumatic event but you've lost it. This level of vitriol and seething hatred for women is not healthy. Seek professional help.

I'm seeing clearer than you, who in the same sentence, goes from "only those ones" to "all of them." It's like you just can't help yourself... you HAVE to be right, and facts and evidence just don't matter... only those feeeeeeelings. Facts in the way? Make shit up and be sure to make sure everyone sees how "bad" the person is. Make 'em angry with some personal insults and false accusation, too. That's how you "win", eh?

I see clearly enough to represent myself in court a number of times and win. No delusion. No vitriol. No hatred - not even for a dirty-fighting liar like yourself.

...and you say my link direct from the Canadian government was "not good enough", yet you dig up something 3rd-party from New England in 1990? Talk about cherry-picking! Bet that one took hours to find!

Oh, and I double-checked my original link. It says quite clearly;
Table 5 shows who received custody of the children and the type of contact that was maintained with the non-custodial parent in cases where the parents said they had a court order.

Table 5: Court-Ordered Custody Arrangement, According to
the Age of the Child at Separation and the Type of Broken Union-NLSCY, Cycle 1, 1994-1995

 

[fskimospy]

I'm seeing clearer than you, who in the same sentence, goes from "only those ones" to "all of them." It's like you just can't help yourself... you HAVE to be right, and facts and evidence just don't matter... only those feeeeeeelings. Facts in the way? Make shit up and be sure to make sure everyone sees how "bad" the person is. Make 'em angry with some personal insults and false accusation, too. That's how you "win", eh?

I see clearly enough to represent myself in court a number of times and win. No delusion. No vitriol. No hatred - not even for a dirty-fighting liar like yourself.

...and you say my link direct from the Canadian government was "not good enough", yet you dig up something 3rd-party from New England in 1990? Talk about cherry-picking! Bet that one took hours to find!

Yes, Canadian law is different than US law. Why does this need to be explained to you? Presumably we are talking about the US here, so citing results from another country is not useful.

My link is a verbatim reproduction of the executive summary from the MA Supreme Court. Additionally, your stats Go from 1994-95. Complaining about people "cherry picking" by taking US stats from 1990 but having no issue with taking foreign stats from 1995 shows how delusional you are. It's even funnier that you do that while complaining about people making decisions based on feelings.

All of your posts are simply dripping with hatred for women. It's seriously not healthy. You are one of the most emotion driven and irrational people in this thread but you're so blinded by hatred you have lost the ability to be self reflective.

 

[Subyman]

You guys must have something better to do today than look up child custody statistics, right?

 

[Atomic Playboy]

Actually, it's about ethics in child custody determinations.

 

[Blue_Max]

All of your posts are simply dripping with hatred for women. It's seriously not healthy. You are one of the most emotion driven and irrational people in this thread but you're so blinded by hatred you have lost the ability to be self reflective.

Just look at all that emotion-packed attack. I could easily say the same for you, where logic, reason and accountability mean nothing. I point out what feminists are doing to hurt people, you endlessly rant and scream about how I hate women to the extreme to shame me into silence or at least going away. It's a tactic that usually works because most people know it's utterly impossible to talk sense into a feminist because they're not using reason for their decision-making in the first place, only blind hatred of things that don't even exist.

You're wrong on all accounts.

 

[Subyman]

Actually, it's about ethics in child custody determinations.

^^^ P&N will argue about anything.

 

[fskimospy]

Just look at all that emotion-packed attack. I could easily say the same for you, where logic, reason and accountability mean nothing. I point out what feminists are doing to hurt people, you endlessly rant and scream about how I hate women to the extreme to shame me into silence or at least going away. It's a tactic that usually works because most people know it's utterly impossible to talk sense into a feminist because they're not using reason for their decision-making in the first place, only blind hatred of things that don't even exist.

You're wrong on all accounts.

My posts are about concern for your mental health. You seriously sound deranged. Like I said, you're unable to reflect on your own thoughts and behaviors and so you're not able to see that your entire argument is based on negative emotional affect for women.

By the way, do you care to discuss the information I linked for you? Do you care to discuss why you thought Canadian statistics from 1995 were ok but US statistics from 1990 were 'cherry picking'?

Please be as specific and as clear as you can be.

 

[shortylickens]

90% are boys.

Yeah but since woman can never tell the difference what does it matter?