dainthomas
Lifer
- Dec 7, 2004
- 14,841
- 3,790
- 136
So? What does that have to do with anything? It's your revaluation about the merged character we aren't supposed to know about that causes a problem. Duh.
Are you seriously that dense?
There's no way you could possibly think I had an issue with consolidation. You said that a certain outcome would fit if a certain character we aren't supposed to know about were merged with this character, which strongly reinforces a certain possible outcome for a question we had about the character we know. SCREW. YOU.
...and then you totally derped and said it that a merge with a character I can name and DO know would explain something BIG. Being vague with the irrelevant source character's names is not the same as being vague with the strong possibilities you are suggesting for another character.
Has it not been made perfectly clear to you that those are exactly the details we do not want?! SCREW OFF.
You two should get a room.