Blackjack200
Lifer
- May 28, 2007
- 15,995
- 1,688
- 126
you mean in 30 years when our kids and their will be paying for all of this?
dumb dems are dumb.
Won't someone please think of the children??!!
you mean in 30 years when our kids and their will be paying for all of this?
dumb dems are dumb.
:hmm:
The government spending prevented the economy from further collapse, I'm getting a new bridge near my house, and they're finally fixing the roads. Goverment debt is, generally, not good; but we're borrowing for a very good reason. You don't balance the budget in a recession, you do it when the economy is growing... like it was from 2002-2008. How did that work out?
You think the budget was balanced in 2002-2008? ROFL. Bush spent like a drunken sailor. Obama is spending live an even more liquored up sailor. We are on the wrong path
You think the budget was balanced in 2002-2008? ROFL. Bush spent like a drunken sailor. Obama is spending live an even more liquored up sailor. We are on the wrong path
I think that was his point....
To think we can sustain this ever increasing debt is purely asanine.
Who said we could?
I dont hear many "progressives" say we cant.
And its my point that the way to fix it is to NOT spend like a fucking idiot. We are now on our way to 14 trillion in debt. Good lord thats fucking sick. To think we can sustain this ever increasing debt is purely asanine.
Time to start shorting all stocks. GOP is going to give us austerity measures to balance the budget, and the economy can't handle that.
How do you feel about the skyrocketing debt? Maybe in 30 years this country will be in complete financial ruin. Will they thank the Democrats largely for that?
It is all about the team right? Screw the rest of the country provided my team wins.
True, it did work with Clinton who had a very successful presidency and it did prevent Bush from being even worse than he was.
Given that his "Team" seems to be in the crapper, you're post seems misplaced.
We will see how the republicans behave if they get power back.
My guess is, it'll be the same fucking joke all over again.
Lets find a way to cut taxes for big businesses and the wealthy, and do symbolic spending cuts all the while driving up the budget deficit.
are you against austerity complete, or just at this time?
if not now, then when would be a good time?
Pfft. We got our legislation passed. That's the real scoreboard.
Today when old people get their SS checks and receive medical treatment thanks to Medicare, they know that the Democrats were responsible.
the gop hasn't been in flames long enough to burn off the slag. I foresee a lot of false conversions in 2010 and 2012, and not a lot of change. It'll be a continuation of bush - obama - [insert next big debt corporatist here]
When economy is booming again. We should have been running surpluses and saving for a rainy day through the early 2000s instead of cutting taxes left and right and running deficits. It's very simple, when consumers are spendful, government should be austere, when consumers are austere, government should be spendful. If both government and consumers are austere, we'll have an economic debacle, which is what GOP wants for 2012 Presidential election.
I think that you and blackjack200 really, really need to quit trying to make sense, OK? Basic pearls before swine and all that...
Repubs will probably be campaigning on taxcut promises and balancing the budget at the same time... along with the usual "god, guns and gays"... a little veiled racism... and sour grapes.
What the polls don't show are the reasons for Obama's declining popularity. Much of it is because he's not liberal enough for much of the Dem base.
Repubs' current claim to fame is obstructionism, kinda like George Wallace in the schoolhouse door... Their solid opposition to the financial reform package is kinda hard to spin to their advantage, for starters...
Repubs may pick up a few seats- we'll see. Regain the majority in either house? Only in their most fevered dreams...
:hmm:
The government spending prevented the economy from further collapse, I'm getting a new bridge near my house, and they're finally fixing the roads. Goverment debt is, generally, not good; but we're borrowing for a very good reason. You don't balance the budget in a recession, you do it when the economy is growing... like it was from 2002-2008. How did that work out?
For all the "progressive" high-fiving over recent events, I'd just like to take a moment to point to the scoreboard:
Cool, enjoy the new bridge. What will happen in 5 years, when the bridge needs repairs? More borrowing?
