Future problem in the country

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: meltdown75

why don't you tell us about your background and upbringing? i'm curious to know what surroundings were required to create a superior life.

I was born in a middle class family and was taught to pay attention, learn, stay out of trouble, and work for what I wanted. At the most basic level of my existence I work for what I have... I do not beg for it or expect others of the government to provide for me. I was taught not to spend money that I don't have and therefore have no debt.

I don't claim to be a superior life but I do work, support myself, and pay taxes so that others can sit home, have sex, rack up debt and produce children which will require a subsidized life.

You just described most of the middle class.. Debt fuelled, because wages have fallen in the last 8 years and prices have gone up.
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: mundane

So if certain groups constitute a disproportionate percentage of the poor, does that imply they have inferior genes and ideally (for the good of the species) should be bred out?

Trying to answer a question like this will inevitably create a massive emotional uproar from people. But emotion doesn't always follow logic, and the things that cause these uproars don't have to make sense.

Speaking from a purely logical standpoint and ignoring any emotional influence the answer would be yes. If you simply removed emotion from your thought process and wanted a factually correct answer, you could probably break it down to numbers like you can for any other problem you want to solve and come up with a solution. However, that solution would not be socially acceptable even if it is factually correct.


An example would be poor vision. Long ago, having poor vision was nearly a death sentence. Someone with extremely poor vision wouldn't be able to hunt or find food. They'd depend on the assistance of others to survive and there would certainly be a social stigma surrounding someone who couldn't care for himself. Obviously that would decrease their chance of reproducing, since someone who couldn't care for themself wouldn't be as desirable as someone who can.

With the advent of glasses this was no longer a limiting factor. People with poor vision could now see almost as well as everybody else. At first, it seemed like this idea would help mankind. However, since it was no longer a limiting factor, people with poor vision were able to breed at about the same rate as everyone else, which increased the number of offspring with poor vision. This lead to what we have today, a society were a huge number of people need vision correction just to go about their normal lives. It has allowed poor genes to propagate.

 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: Patt


Everything you are listing is about being taught something ... it isn't breeding, it is upbringing.

Ok, but who is bringing up the children of poor parents? Those poor parents are! They are teaching their bad habits to their children.
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: cubeless


i question who b the fool... that's nazi think on your part, methinks... we best start gassin' them poor folk...

FYI: it makes one sound like a high school kid when they bring up Nazi's every time they hear something that's not politically correct. It seems to be the extreme that they can't help but to bring up.

It is now ineffective as an argument tool since it's so incredibly overused.

Originally posted by: cubeless

i grew up 'poor'... my mom worked like a mule for low wages to raise 4 kids... i ain't poor now, and neither is she... you can overcome circumstances if you don't blame others for them and bust your ass... too bad it's a lot easier to be a lazy dumbass than a hard working dumbass...

If your family worked hard for what you had then I wouldn't group you in with the subject of this post. I'm referring to the drags on society which are people who are poor, require government subsidies to live, and do nothing to improve their situation.
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: Throckmorton

You just described most of the middle class.. Debt fuelled, because wages have fallen in the last 8 years and prices have gone up.

The middle class is the middle class because they produce more than they take in. If they didn't, they'd be the lower class. Sure they have debt, but they're able to pay it off. Those who cannot are on their way to becoming poor.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: mundane

So if certain groups constitute a disproportionate percentage of the poor, does that imply they have inferior genes and ideally (for the good of the species) should be bred out?

Trying to answer a question like this will inevitably create a massive emotional uproar from people. But emotion doesn't always follow logic, and the things that cause these uproars don't have to make sense.

Speaking from a purely logical standpoint and ignoring any emotional influence the answer would be yes. If you simply removed emotion from your thought process and wanted a factually correct answer, you could probably break it down to numbers like you can for any other problem you want to solve and come up with a solution. However, that solution would not be socially acceptable even if it is factually correct.

There could be outside influences that cause a group to be disproportionately poor when otherwise they would not be. Racism, for instance.
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: mugs

There could be outside influences that cause a group to be disproportionately poor when otherwise they would not be. Racism, for instance.

It could, but you could figure out how much of a factor that is by comparing that group of people in one country to the same group in other countries. If you're talking about certain African descendants I wouldn't say that it's racism which is keeping them down, it's them. They're usually poor in every country which they reside in including their home continent.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Hitler already found a solution for this.

A 'final solution'.

The OP would be surprised to hear that he isn't the first person in history to attribute the economic struggles of a society on a particular class or people.
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Hitler already found a solution for this.

A 'final solution'.

The OP would be surprised to hear that he isn't the first person in history to attribute the economic struggles of a society on a particular class or people.

It's a shame that the more emotional people can't hold a rational argument and instead rely on emotional extremism.

Like I said in an earlier post, "it makes one sound like a high school kid when they bring up Nazi's every time they hear something that's not politically correct. It seems to be the extreme that they can't help but to bring up. It is now ineffective as an argument tool since it's so incredibly overused. "

You cannot compare this to Hitler because he was mainly trying to eliminate a group (Jews) who was very successful in his country and was a huge asset to Germany scientifically and industrially before he hatched his crazy plans.

I'm talking about deadbeats who don't contribute much of anything, and I'm not advocating killing them.
 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Hitler already found a solution for this.

A 'final solution'.

The OP would be surprised to hear that he isn't the first person in history to attribute the economic struggles of a society on a particular class or people.
hey, i think you missed the part where the OP pre-empted anyone using the Nazi example as sounding "like a high school kid" ;)
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Hitler already found a solution for this.

A 'final solution'.

The OP would be surprised to hear that he isn't the first person in history to attribute the economic struggles of a society on a particular class or people.
hey, i think you missed the part where the OP pre-empted anyone using the Nazi example as sounding "like a high school kid" ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwins_law

Seriously, relying on that lame tactic doesn't lend any credibility to an argument and is only used to dig up strong emotions instead of what the discussion really needs- rational thinking and reason.
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
I've met idiots and assholes in all walks of life (the OP being one example). The poor do not corner the market in that regard.
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: jjones
I've met idiots and assholes in all walks of life (the OP being one example). The poor do not corner the market in that regard.

It's funny just how emotional much of the ATOT crowd is. It's not that surprising considering that most of them are still pretty young and have their hormones interrupting their thought process.

What about my post makes me an asshole? The fact that I'm talking about a subject or have viewpoints that offend you?
 
May 31, 2001
15,326
2
0
Most people don't like to discuss this issue in a rational manner, they prefer to make it a case of extremes so that they can make one side or the other look bad.

Politicians will not propose anything with teeth in a Democratic society because the "dumb masses" or whatever name it was that an earlier poster used to refer to them will vote them out. That is no different that how things tend to work for any other serious issue a Democracy faces, at least when the people refuse to put up with an instant of personal discomfort even though it might save them from a world of hurt down the road.
 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven
Most people don't like to discuss this issue in a rational manner, they prefer to make it a case of extremes so that they can make one side or the other look bad.

Politicians will not propose anything with teeth in a Democratic society because the "dumb masses" or whatever name it was that an earlier poster used to refer to them will vote them out. That is no different that how things tend to work for any other serious issue a Democracy faces, at least when the people refuse to put up with an instant of personal discomfort even though it might save them from a world of hurt down the road.

Thank you.

This is exactly what I'm talking about.
 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Hitler already found a solution for this.

A 'final solution'.

The OP would be surprised to hear that he isn't the first person in history to attribute the economic struggles of a society on a particular class or people.
hey, i think you missed the part where the OP pre-empted anyone using the Nazi example as sounding "like a high school kid" ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwins_law

Seriously, relying on that lame tactic doesn't lend any credibility to an argument and is only used to dig up strong emotions instead of what the discussion really needs- rational thinking and reason.
Interesting reading. Check this one out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: jjones
I've met idiots and assholes in all walks of life (the OP being one example). The poor do not corner the market in that regard.

It's funny just how emotional much of the ATOT crowd is. It's not that surprising considering that most of them are still pretty young and have their hormones interrupting their thought process.

What about my post makes me an asshole? The fact that I'm talking about a subject or have viewpoints that offend you?
Nothing emotional about my response, just pointing out a simple fact. I'm 48, traveled extensively and have met and interacted with a great deal of people covering a wide spectrum of the social strata, so I'll hazard a guess and say I've a bit more experience than you.

What makes me think you're an idiot? Pretty much everything you have spewed thus far in this thread.

Or perhaps you have an excuse. Being young and full of hormones does make you stupid, as you say.
 

jersiq

Senior member
May 18, 2005
887
1
0
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: cubeless


i question who b the fool... that's nazi think on your part, methinks... we best start gassin' them poor folk...

FYI: it makes one sound like a high school kid when they bring up Nazi's every time they hear something that's not politically correct. It seems to be the extreme that they can't help but to bring up.

It is now ineffective as an argument tool since it's so incredibly overused.

Originally posted by: cubeless

i grew up 'poor'... my mom worked like a mule for low wages to raise 4 kids... i ain't poor now, and neither is she... you can overcome circumstances if you don't blame others for them and bust your ass... too bad it's a lot easier to be a lazy dumbass than a hard working dumbass...

If your family worked hard for what you had then I wouldn't group you in with the subject of this post. I'm referring to the drags on society which are people who are poor, require government subsidies to live, and do nothing to improve their situation.

Which is a learned behavior ;)

 

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: jjones

Nothing emotional about my response, just pointing out a simple fact. I'm 48, traveled extensively and have met and interacted with a great deal of people covering a wide spectrum of the social strata, so I'll hazard a guess and say I've a bit more experience than you.

Oh ok, you're a grumpy old man, I get it.
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
Both my wife and I have higher than average intelligence. I have neck/knee problems, but no cancers or heart problems in my family, and she's very healthy except for some teeth problems (I have naturally straight and cavity free teeth). So we've decided to have 50 babies. Gotta do our part to offset the genetic imbalance. :p
 

MidasKnight

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2004
3,288
0
76
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: jjones
I've met idiots and assholes in all walks of life (the OP being one example). The poor do not corner the market in that regard.

It's funny just how emotional much of the ATOT crowd is. It's not that surprising considering that most of them are still pretty young and have their hormones interrupting their thought process.

What about my post makes me an asshole? The fact that I'm talking about a subject or have viewpoints that offend you?

You are from the Planet Vulcan are you not ? Here is your new avatar :


Emotionless Vulcan


Blaming a class of people for a Country's woes and ill's is bigotry ... plane and simple.


 

Born2bwire

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2005
9,840
6
71
Hahahah, the OP never fails to entertain me. He helps serve to remind us that idiocy and arrogance can be found anywhere in life.
 

manowar821

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2007
6,063
0
0
Originally posted by: KK
Poor dumb people are going to reproduce faster, they are idiots. did you expect them to be busy working?

You're a retard, being an idiot gives them a better chance of being poor, but being poor doesn't mean they're automatically idiots.

Idiots reproduce more often, that's the problem. It just happens that they're usually poor because they're idiots. There are idiots who are rich and pump out a kid every year, and there are poor couples who aren't idiots who don't breed at all, knowing full well they're not in a position to be procreating.

The idiots are even in this thread, and some of em' have kids!