Originally posted by: Demon-Xanth
The difference with science and religion, is that with science, you need to prove something is right for it to change. For religion, you can prove something is wrong and it still won't change. Also, scientists WILL change if given sufficient evidence.
I'm going to make a rough analogy:
Science:
"I think the inside of a tennis ball is green or white because that's what the outside is."
"Okay, prove it."
*cuts open tennis ball*
"Okay, the inside of the tennis ball is grey."
Religion:
"I think the inside of a tennis ball is green or white because that's what the outside is."
"Okay, prove it."
"You have to trust me on this."
"Well, lets cut open the tennis ball and look."
"We can't do that, it wouldn't be right."
"Why not?"
"It's just not right."
"Well, I think the inside of the tennis ball is probably grey or something like that."
"I just said the inside is green or white. Not grey."
"How do you know?"
"How do you know I'm wrong?"
"My buddy in China thinks the inside is red though."
"He's wrong."
"Why do you say that?"
"Because the inside is green or white."
"How do you know?"
"Prove me wrong."
"Okay, give me the tennis ball."
"I can't let you cut it open!"
Edit:
When religion and science meet:
"Hey, we cut open a tennis ball and the inside is grey!"
"That's just wrong! The inside is green and white!"
"Here's the tennis ball, it's grey."
"Well, this one is green and white."
"50 people have cut open tennis balls, they're all grey."
"So prove this one isn't green and white, without cutting it open."
"I can't do that, I'm not superman."
"So you admit I'm right."
"No, it's just that the evidence supports that it's going to be grey."
"That's just a theory."
"It's better than your theory."
"But I wrote down my theory in a book before yours. And it was told to me by some homeless guy when I was a kid. He's always right, so I know it's green and white."