It's the same old issue.
The owners always have the same interests: minimize their costs. Pay less, spend less on safety, etc.
Sometimes things can artifically incent them to do better - unions forcing higher wages, fines and lawsuits making a lack of safety costly.
People would do well to understand the history of these issues and how if they can, workers get their wages and safety way too low by the owners.
And it's the same debate; those who want decent things for workers on one side, and the ignorant apologists for owners saying 'if you don't like it don't do it' on the others.
CurrentTV and other channels have some good documentaries how bad this gets - such as workers getting sulfur from a volcano, walking through zones of poisonous gas, carrying very heavy loads up rocky cliffs where they fall hundreds of feet - for almost nothing, because it's that or starve.
It's immoral what 'the right' fights for on issues like this - blame the workers.
It's because the companies, under competitive pressure, push hard for cutting costs to the point of going too far; and the success of right-wing propaganda to elect the sort of whore politicians who will vote for any 'pro-business laws' to not do anything to improve the situation.
It comes down to voters who are idiots easily duped into voting for the bad guys because the advertising for them is well funded, defeating democracy.