cybrsage
Lifer
- Nov 17, 2011
- 13,021
- 0
- 0
The law doesn't state intent.
Sure they do, you are just sore that you were caught lying again.
The law doesn't state intent.
You know what Cybersage is right they found the evil illegal voter.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...ught-in-us-fake-voter-dragnet/article4531032/
Of course there is the slight possibility that fraudulent voters have just not been caught, unlike this unfortunate Canadian
Sure they do, you are just sore that you were caught lying again.
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/CFDOCS...d=0&billBody=H&billTyp=B&billNbr=0934&pn=3166THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSE BILL
No.934 Session of 2011
INTRODUCED BY METCALFE, AUMENT, BARRAR, BOYD, CAUSER, CLYMER, COX, CREIGHTON, CRUZ, CUTLER, DENLINGER, DUNBAR, ELLIS, EVANKOVICH, EVERETT, GABLER, GEIST, GILLEN, GINGRICH, GRELL, GROVE, HELM, HICKERNELL, KAUFFMAN, KNOWLES, KRIEGER, MAHER, MARSHALL, MILLARD, MOUL, PEIFER, PERRY, PETRI, PICKETT, PYLE, RAPP, REED, ROAE, SACCONE, SAYLOR, SCHRODER, SIMMONS, SONNEY, STEVENSON, TALLMAN, TRUITT, VULAKOVICH AND REICHLEY, MARCH 4, 2011
SENATOR CORMAN, APPROPRIATIONS, IN SENATE, RE-REPORTED AS AMENDED, MARCH 5, 2012
AN ACT
1 Amending the act of June 3, 1937 (P.L.1333, No.320), entitled...
...
10 Section 1. Section 102 of the act of June 3, 1937 (P.L.1333,
11 No.320), known as the Pennsylvania Election Code, is amended by
At least you showed that those who say it is not happening are all liars. Well done in your support for voter ID. :thumbsup:
Nobody in this thread has said it doesn't happen, but rather that it's statistically insignificant...
For example, if we look at the photo ID law, it clearly says its purpose at the start of the law...which is not surprising, they all do:
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/CFDOCS...d=0&billBody=H&billTyp=B&billNbr=0934&pn=3166
I'm quite sure that laws establishing poll taxes & literacy tests were equally expressive of true intent.
Cannibalism is stastistically insignificant too...
Just saying that you are using a bad line of reasoning.
What you want is akin to saying they cannot look for dead human remains in the homes in order to prove cannibalism. We all know you use the phrase "false equivalency" to mean "oh crap, I cannot actually defend against that". You do it all the time.
At least you showed that those who say it is not happening are all liars. Well done in your support for voter ID. :thumbsup:
Good job...
In the hopes to show you that your logic is failed, I will move on to an even easier to understand example. You are required to show ID to fly an airplane because less than a dozen people who flew were hijackers and terrorists in 2001.
Why aren't you not fighting the good fight to make the photo ID requirement to fly go away?
No, no, all the credit for proving in person voter fraud exists goes to you in this case. You did the work, stand up and take the bow and the applause for it, you deserve it.
Why are you desperately duh-verting?
Oh, wait- I already know, it's because you're desperate.
No no vato, I wouldn't (and really couldn't if I tried) dream of taking away from the master of making posts that are near perfect specimens of meandering morasses of mediocrity.
You are too oblivious to your mastery in that regard.
No diversion, just showing your logic to be full of fail. You recognize this, so you shift to your other tactic of "crap, that really is true, but I have to admit I am wrong so I will instead play stupid and say duh".
You merely showed your desperation.
Flying in a commercial airliner & voting are unrelated activities. Being unable to board an airplane doesn't mean you should be unable to vote. Millions of citizens who have the right to vote will never fly anywhere.
Maybe we should establish some arbitrary & capricious no vote list like the no fly list, huh?
Oh, wait... Repubs are already doing that....
You are too modest bro...you do deserve the credit, you did it all by yourself.