How many times does this shit have to be debunked?
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-19592372
Does not debunk. You take issue with the absolute numbers. That's not the point, the relative numbers are the point. Muslims went, crime rates went up, and
when the rate of Muslim men raping Swedish women is more than 20x higher that of others, that says something.
You apparently didn't want to quote it, so I will:
"The thing is, the number of reported rapes has been going up in Sweden - it's almost trebled in just the last seven years. In 2003, about 2,200 offences were reported by the police, compared to nearly 6,000 in 2010.So something's going on.
But Klara Selin says the statistics don't represent a major crime epidemic, rather a shift in attitudes. The public debate about this sort of crime in Sweden over the past two decades has had the effect of raising awareness, she says, and encouraging women to go to the police if they have been attacked.
The police have also made efforts to improve their handling of cases, she suggests, though she doesn't deny that there has been some real increase in the number of attacks taking place - a concern also outlined in
an Amnesty International report in 2010.
"There might also be some increase in actual crime because of societal changes. Due to the internet, for example, it's much easier these days to meet somebody, just the same evening if you want to. Also, alcohol consumption has increased quite a lot during this period.
"But the major explanation is partly that people go to the police more often, but also the fact that in 2005 there has been reform in the sex crime legislation, which made the legal definition of rape much wider than before."
The entire BBC explanation relies on "Klara Selin" and her opinion that the rape stats have increased mostly due to better reporting. However, if you think about it, you can't know exactly how much underreporting was done because, well, it wasn't reported.
Moreoever, Klara Selin admitted that there could be other factors as well, but it being Sweden, she would not blame it on any non-P.C. causes. That does not prove or disprove anything, only that she wasn't willing to pin it on Muslim immigration.
Sweden's immigration rate is almost off the chart (see the article linked to below for how ridiculous their immigration rate is). Given a few more decades of this and what is "Swedish" today won't be very Swedish at all.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...in-the-world-was-overwhelmed-by-migrants.html
Apparently even idiotic Swedish government isn't quite idiotic enough to keep the doors open for much longer, though:
http://news.yahoo.com/sweden-tighte...trols-asylum-numbers-142938511--business.html
But it's too late, they will keep coming even if it takes falsified papers or whatever. It's only a matter of time before they reduce the subsidies for their welfare state, which keeps drawing Third World throngs.