• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Found out my sister was dating a POS

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Maybe all your sister wants is sex, maybe she is going to use HIM. I would tell her your opinion of the guy and what you honestly KNOW about him, but she has to make her own decisions and mistakes, it's the only way she will learn. Be a good brother and force her into the car and take her to planned parenthood and make her get an implant so at least she wont get preggers......


 
Originally posted by: OmarGustav
What's your sisters phone number? I'll break her in nice and slow for you...

😛

Nick I'm still waiting for the follow up..



This thread will never die..

 
Originally posted by: nick1985
maybe im the only one, but im not looking for sex with my girlfriend. and im an 18 year old college guy....wierd how the world works i guess.
You're abnormal. Go see a doctor. Or a shrink.
 
I am glad at least some of ATOT acknowledge that women like sex and base relationships purely on sex also....

Unfortunately for me, one of the times I really really liked the girl, but she just wanted to play the field, it was sort of ok until my friend told me 'about' her. I think he was the most hurt (she took his virginity)...the funniest part of it all is my mom had been a OB-GYN nurse throughout my high school days, and I was big into Biology, I had a lot of girlfriends but I was afraid to do anything with them and sort of clueless about girls/women at the time. I think I pissed off a lot of them at the time...🙂


 
So is this thread dead, alive or what? Hehehe! 😛

"What do I say that I do another?"

All right, I'll give you examples. There are more instances, but here's one: "Hmm no STD's ever....also HPV is a pretty broad condition....many many have that and don't know it. Only a few strains even show symptoms and a few symptomless types are only problematic for females. You spew ignorance sir."

"Even as an adult, I took risks sometimes....almost no one uses protection during oral sex....but that's just as risky, if not more. Again you speak from inexperience/ignorance."

Another one. So what exactly is your point there? You resort to declaring the poster ignorant without establishing the connection. You yourself said things like "almost", "many", etc. so you're admitting that this does not apply to everyone who engages in oral sex or intercourse.

"my point was anyone that says they 100% use protection for every possible encounter including oral sex is lying or has only had a handful of the said encounters."

Then you proceed to try elaborating the above, but instead you end up contradicting yourself. Here you declared that all persons who have engaged in oral sex and other encounters must have at least once failed to use protection otherwise the person's only had a handful of encounters. A dichotomy here, no? It seems inconsistent with your previous statements. You jumped from existential quantifiers to a universal statement. Wouldn't you have to prove every single case? So what qualifies you anymore than the person you're declaring "ignorant" for having a differing view?

Having read your post here: "the funniest part of it all is my mom had been a OB-GYN nurse throughout my high school days, and I was big into Biology, I had a lot of girlfriends but I was afraid to do anything with them and sort of clueless about girls/women at the time. I think I pissed off a lot of them at the time..."

now it seems more understandable why you seem so into the subject of sex and hardly seem to accommodate different views. I guess you moved from one extreme to another. If it didn't seem like such a big deal to you then, it woudn't be a big deal now either to the extent that you seem to feel deprived if you don't get it all the time.
 
Originally posted by: luvly

Another one. So what exactly is your point there? You resort to declaring the poster ignorant without establishing the connection. You yourself said things like "almost", "many", etc. so you're admitting that this does not apply to everyone who engages in oral sex or intercourse.

?!? I don't know what you are getting at other than just attempting to cause conflict....however like I said in response to the OP betting me $10 I had HPV....many people have HPV, but for most people that is not an issue as the strain is no problem causing.


Then you proceed to try elaborating the above, but instead you end up contradicting yourself. Here you declared that all persons who have engaged in oral sex and other encounters must have at least once failed to use protection otherwise the person's only had a handful of encounters. A dichotomy here, no? It seems inconsistent with your previous statements. You jumped from existential quantifiers to a universal statement. Wouldn't you have to prove every single case? So what qualifies you anymore than the person you're declaring "ignorant" for having a differing view?

No retard, I said all persons that have had sex frequently have at some point or another failed to use protection, whether you wet your whistle and then strap up or just go all the way bareback. However since you obviously are without a head you must fail to understand what I meant....existential and the universal side of things are a common attempted counter to an argument, however in this case really not applicable since I am SURE no one here really thinks everyone REALLY means everyone....this is in notation to a majority and even a very large majority.


now it seems more understandable why you seem so into the subject of sex and hardly seem to accommodate different views. I guess you moved from one extreme to another. If it didn't seem like such a big deal to you then, it woudn't be a big deal now either to the extent that you seem to feel deprived if you don't get it all the time.
[/quote]

hmmm other than merely attempting to attack me, I am not sure where this is going. I don't feel deprived of anything..however if I wanted sex and it was being withheld without a good reason, I will rest assure you I'd have it served up on a silver platter within a few hours, without pay and without a trade of services.

Rather than debate things on ATOT, luvly, you should look for some sort of head to call your own to stick on all the 'ethiopian' body pics you spew here in attempts for us to admire you, shouldn't you be looking for something to eat?...don't you just hate it that Dezign merely has to type two letters and gets a crowd running silly around her, but you can post volumes and no one seems to give a crap, even the other women?!?

Don't you just hate I could care less whether you attempt to flame me or not? However it's obvious you do.


 
Ooooooooooooooooooooooh! I was about to be nice to you, but you crossed the line again. If you're wrong about something, admit it; or modify your statement and explain to the other party what you intended instead of resorting to name calling. You initiate personal attacks only if you have no substance in your arguments. Now you have opened up the door to get some back at you:

"What I am saying is I don't trust information from anyone that can't be validated if that person feels they must hide their identity also....

Everyone knows about your little silly passwords luvly, and everyone talks about your headless pictures....I am not the smart one that discovered this. If you are a woman on almost any board guys are going to be bookmarking and PMing you and then coming back to the boards asking 'Does [my next eWife's] site come up for everyone else? I get page not found/password/empty album...'..."


Uhmmm . . . you got me rather more confused. You seem to have branched off again. It doesn't seem to match what you seemed to be saying earlier about I being afraid. I don't think I'll ask for anymore explanations 'cuz I'll have worse headache than I had on the day you made this post. Just go enjoy yourself here, if it makes you happy with stalking: Collections. I had a blast once again.

"Rather than debate things on ATOT, luvly, you should look for some sort of head to call your own to stick on all the 'ethiopian' body pics you spew here in attempts for us to admire you, shouldn't you be looking for something to eat?..."

Anything wrong with the Ethopian body? Are you jealous that I have a future and you don't? The good thing is, I am in demand, but you aren't. Cry if you want to 'cuz what consumers are buying speaks volume. Even at AT, look at the results I got: 400+ viewers and 2500+ hits, right before I locked the album.

"Everyone knows that you have claimed to be a model, psychiatrist, doctor, lawyer, etc....I bet if you search for your username you will find discussions solely about what are you?
Also who's do say I don't have the whole gallery hosted someplace else or saved?"


Huh? I don't remember ever saying I was a psychiatrist or doctor or even a lawyer! Where do you get these ideas from? Are you losing it, smart a$$? Oh, I forgot: You've been hallucinating all this while. I have posted my opinions on matters as a layperson, but if I were a psychiatrist or doctor you would know 'cuz I would make it known. I wish I were all you purport I am. LOL! Imagine if I asserted that you were a doctor just because you have opinions on discussions of this nature and try discussing biology and diseases as if you're an expert. What I have said is that I'm a model, an aspiring law student/economist who philosophises often and once loved to work on maths problems. Hopefully this clears things up!

"This is why many women do not talk about their pasts....they end up getting judged for them."

What qualifies you to be a spokesperson for women? You know, I can speak for and defend myself as a woman in this society. Speak for yourself. I don't see the correlation in your statement and the previous statements within the same post. How do you jump from explaining yourself and failure to use protection to speaking for women? It would seem to me that you as a man are in a position that requires defending your conducts too, so why play strawman or red herring? Are you trying to protect yourself by shifting the subject to women being judged? Or are you saying that you as a man can defend your stand but women are too weak to do just what you?re doing: Defend themselves? So much for a sudden sensitive guy looking for the interest of women, yet he resorts to personal attacks. Wonderful!

"either way I live comfortably enough to pay for a $1000 lawyer bill, join a gym, and yearly passes for my wife and I to Disney last month without touching savings or changing my spending..."

Dang, bragger! Do you have a cheap lawyer or what? Or is this a one time request for service, not a lawyer representing you in a criminal case or civil lawsuit for passing on a disease to some chick? :Q LMAO! I just felt like poking a little fun at you. 😉 😀
 
hmmm apparently you had some time on your hands in you busy modeling schedule to go piece together posts of mine.

Originally posted by: luvly
Ooooooooooooooooooooooh! I was about to be nice to you, but you crossed the line again. If you're wrong about something, admit it; or modify your statement and explain to the other party what you intended instead of resorting to name calling. You initiate personal attacks only if you have no substance in your arguments. Now you have opened up the door to get some back at you:

to get back at me I'd have to care first.

Uhmmm . . . you got me rather more confused. You seem to have branched off again. It doesn't seem to match what you seemed to be saying earlier about I being afraid. I don't think I'll ask for anymore explanations 'cuz I'll have worse headache than I had on the day you made this post. Just go enjoy yourself here, if it makes you happy with stalking: Collections. I had a blast once again.

Look I am not the one claiming these things only, do a search for yourself and you can see the discussions.


Anything wrong with the Ethopian body? Are you jealous that I have a future and you don't? The good thing is, I am in demand, but you aren't. Cry if you want to 'cuz what consumers are buying speaks volume. Even at AT, look at the results I got: 400+ viewers and 2500+ hits, right before I locked the album.

Freakshows get similar hits, frankly I don't see the how this is so special and I find it doubtful there were 400 unique views from one post, lifetime maybe....but since you are so beautiful, perhaps Dezign could share how many hits she get by merely typing 'meh' into a thread 😉


Huh? I don't remember ever saying I was a psychiatrist or doctor or even a lawyer! Where do you get these ideas from? Are you losing it, smart a$$? Oh, I forgot: You've been hallucinating all this while. I have posted my opinions on matters as a layperson, but if I were a psychiatrist or doctor you would know 'cuz I would make it known. I wish I were all you purport I am. LOL! Imagine if I asserted that you were a doctor just because you have opinions on discussions of this nature and try discussing biology and diseases as if you're an expert. What I have said is that I'm a model, an aspiring law student/economist who philosophises often and once loved to work on maths problems. Hopefully this clears things up!

you may not remember but the board does...you seem to be an expert and also claim you are an expert in every thread, not by experience, but by education or profession.

What qualifies you to be a spokesperson for women? You know, I can speak for and defend myself as a woman in this society. Speak for yourself. I don't see the correlation in your statement and the previous statements within the same post. How do you jump from explaining yourself and failure to use protection to speaking for women? It would seem to me that you as a man are in a position that requires defending your conducts too, so why play strawman or red herring? Are you trying to protect yourself by shifting the subject to women being judged? Or are you saying that you as a man can defend your stand but women are too weak to do just what you?re doing: Defend themselves? So much for a sudden sensitive guy looking for the interest of women, yet he resorts to personal attacks. Wonderful!

Hmm I talk to alot of women and understand them, I am hardly their spokesperson, but you hear the same trends. However, I am not sure what you are trying to say above. I don't have to defend anything I do, I defend what I do because I believe in it. I am saying a woman can also defend themselves....I don't think you qualify as either so you are sort of a gray area.

Dang, bragger! Do you have a cheap lawyer or what? Or is this a one time request for service, not a lawyer representing you in a criminal case or civil lawsuit for passing on a disease to some chick? :Q LMAO! I just felt like poking a little fun at you. 😉 😀

Not a bragger at all, was explaining things....if I wanted to brag I could mention a lot more money going through my hands, but that wasn't the point. I don't think I have a cheap lawyer though that $1000 was for about 3 hours of work if that...he is the best in my area. This is not a lawsuit case in the sense that I will be sharing a judgement with him. It's a matter that I could handle but my wife wants to pay for it.

You sure you have time to argue with me with your busy international modeling career?
 
"hmmm apparently you had some time on your hands in you busy modeling schedule to go piece together posts of mine."

Huh? Don't flatter yourself. I just copy and paste what I read. It's within this thread, so how's that a difficult task or how does it require much time? 😕

"to get back at me I'd have to care first."

Yeah, cover up your behind. Your action speaks louder! You show way too much interest for someone who's even married. 😛

"Look I am not the one claiming these things only, do a search for yourself and you can see the discussions."

You keep on saying that. I still wonder where you get these supposed threads. Do you always imagine things, hon'?

"Freakshows get similar hits, frankly I don't see the how this is so special and I find it doubtful there were 400 unique views from one post, lifetime maybe....but since you are so beautiful, perhaps Dezign could share how many hits she get by merely typing 'meh' into a thread"

Notice I deliberately made no statements about Dezign. Dezign is her own person, in spite of your efforts to drag her name into this discussion. I won't engage myself in that topic. She has a different path and plan from my mine. What AT members think of Dezign is irrelevant as to my success in the real world in the field of modelling (i.e., becoming a supermodel).

"you may not remember but the board does...you seem to be an expert and also claim you are an expert in every thread, not by experience, but by education or profession."

Hon', your memory couldn't be further from reliable. You want me to show you an instance that would indicate that you don't have the best long-term memory in the world? I, on the other hand, have a pretty good long-term memory. Anyway, seriously, I would bet a million with you that I've never once stated that I was a doctor, psychiatrist--or even posted in that capacity (i.e, as an expert); nor have I claimed to be a lawyer. If anyone claimed I said that, then that person simply chose to perceive my implicit statements that way, put words where there wasn't any and interpret things as they desired. You see what you want to see, read what you want to read and hear what you want to hear. So, show me one instance where I explicitly stated that I was a doctor, psychiatrist or lawyer, especially the first two. Furthermore, if you miraculously find something that I have never claimed, then show me one that was never in humour or sarcasm.

"Hmm I talk to alot of women and understand them, I am hardly their spokesperson, but you hear the same trends. However, I am not sure what you are trying to say above. I don't have to defend anything I do, I defend what I do because I believe in it. I am saying a woman can also defend themselves....I don't think you qualify as either so you are sort of a gray area."

I see, expert. I frankly don't see what's unclear there. I am saying you tried the tactic of changing the subject to women. 'Oh, poor women! They cannot defend themselves so they hide out of fear of being judged.' It was irrelevant where you posted it. It didn't make sense 'cuz you didn't connect it to your case. The poster was questioning your wisdom, or lack thereof, in failing to use protection or acting loose. As far as I know, you're not a woman . . . or are you? Well, maybe you are one if you are saying I'm a grey area. LOL! 😀

"Not a bragger at all, was explaining things....if I wanted to brag I could mention a lot more money going through my hands, but that wasn't the point. I don't think I have a cheap lawyer though that $1000 was for about 3 hours of work if that...he is the best in my area. This is not a lawsuit case in the sense that I will be sharing a judgement with him. It's a matter that I could handle but my wife wants to pay for it."

I was really just teasing you, even though you do sound like a bragger. Nothing wrong with bragging if you have stuff to back it up.

"You sure you have time to argue with me with your busy international modeling career?"

LOL! We'll see! For now though, help me out here: Help me choose what design to keep (between the skirt with top and the dress with sleeves). The designer will let me keep one of her outfits, but I don't know which to choose. They're meant to convey a techno/rad look, so keep that in mind. Don't ask me questions! Just choose any please! Thanks in advance if you do provide a relevant input.
 
Originally posted by: luvly
Nothing wrong with bragging if you have stuff to back it up.
Is that why you don't want people to see your face; because you have nothing to back up your bragging?
 
Originally posted by: luvly
So is this thread dead, alive or what? Hehehe! 😛

"What do I say that I do another?"

All right, I'll give you examples. There are more instances, but here's one: "Hmm no STD's ever....also HPV is a pretty broad condition....many many have that and don't know it. Only a few strains even show symptoms and a few symptomless types are only problematic for females. You spew ignorance sir."

"Even as an adult, I took risks sometimes....almost no one uses protection during oral sex....but that's just as risky, if not more. Again you speak from inexperience/ignorance."

Another one. So what exactly is your point there? You resort to declaring the poster ignorant without establishing the connection. You yourself said things like "almost", "many", etc. so you're admitting that this does not apply to everyone who engages in oral sex or intercourse.

"my point was anyone that says they 100% use protection for every possible encounter including oral sex is lying or has only had a handful of the said encounters."

Then you proceed to try elaborating the above, but instead you end up contradicting yourself. Here you declared that all persons who have engaged in oral sex and other encounters must have at least once failed to use protection otherwise the person's only had a handful of encounters. A dichotomy here, no? It seems inconsistent with your previous statements. You jumped from existential quantifiers to a universal statement. Wouldn't you have to prove every single case? So what qualifies you anymore than the person you're declaring "ignorant" for having a differing view?

Having read your post here: "the funniest part of it all is my mom had been a OB-GYN nurse throughout my high school days, and I was big into Biology, I had a lot of girlfriends but I was afraid to do anything with them and sort of clueless about girls/women at the time. I think I pissed off a lot of them at the time..."

now it seems more understandable why you seem so into the subject of sex and hardly seem to accommodate different views. I guess you moved from one extreme to another. If it didn't seem like such a big deal to you then, it woudn't be a big deal now either to the extent that you seem to feel deprived if you don't get it all the time.

You are contiunally making yourself look like an idiot on this forum by acting like some kind of know-it-all shrink/lawyer/doctor/guru whateverthefvck. Congratulations, you have a big vocabulary.

*golf clap*
 
Originally posted by: nan0bug
Originally posted by: luvly
So is this thread dead, alive or what? Hehehe! 😛

"What do I say that I do another?"

All right, I'll give you examples. There are more instances, but here's one: "Hmm no STD's ever....also HPV is a pretty broad condition....many many have that and don't know it. Only a few strains even show symptoms and a few symptomless types are only problematic for females. You spew ignorance sir."

"Even as an adult, I took risks sometimes....almost no one uses protection during oral sex....but that's just as risky, if not more. Again you speak from inexperience/ignorance."

Another one. So what exactly is your point there? You resort to declaring the poster ignorant without establishing the connection. You yourself said things like "almost", "many", etc. so you're admitting that this does not apply to everyone who engages in oral sex or intercourse.

"my point was anyone that says they 100% use protection for every possible encounter including oral sex is lying or has only had a handful of the said encounters."

Then you proceed to try elaborating the above, but instead you end up contradicting yourself. Here you declared that all persons who have engaged in oral sex and other encounters must have at least once failed to use protection otherwise the person's only had a handful of encounters. A dichotomy here, no? It seems inconsistent with your previous statements. You jumped from existential quantifiers to a universal statement. Wouldn't you have to prove every single case? So what qualifies you anymore than the person you're declaring "ignorant" for having a differing view?

Having read your post here: "the funniest part of it all is my mom had been a OB-GYN nurse throughout my high school days, and I was big into Biology, I had a lot of girlfriends but I was afraid to do anything with them and sort of clueless about girls/women at the time. I think I pissed off a lot of them at the time..."

now it seems more understandable why you seem so into the subject of sex and hardly seem to accommodate different views. I guess you moved from one extreme to another. If it didn't seem like such a big deal to you then, it woudn't be a big deal now either to the extent that you seem to feel deprived if you don't get it all the time.

You are contiunally making yourself look like an idiot on this forum by acting like some kind of know-it-all shrink/lawyer/doctor/guru whateverthefvck. Congratulations, you have a big vocabulary.

*golf clap*

 
Anyway, you say one thing but do another. You're praising yourself for admitting to mistakes in your life and not claiming to be better than anyone else, unlike others. Well, dear, reread your previous posts. Once again, you managed to argue that no one could possibly be qualified to have a view different from yours. First off, you don't even admit to any mistakes. They're mistakes in the view of the readers, but from your tone and view, your actions in fact should be the model behaviour mimicked by others.

You guys both seem to showboat a bit, but his posts at least seem grounded in a really open, honest approach to life. The above quote reads like character assasination to me, and its kinda ghetto.
 
Originally posted by: isaacmacdonald
Anyway, you say one thing but do another. You're praising yourself for admitting to mistakes in your life and not claiming to be better than anyone else, unlike others. Well, dear, reread your previous posts. Once again, you managed to argue that no one could possibly be qualified to have a view different from yours. First off, you don't even admit to any mistakes. They're mistakes in the view of the readers, but from your tone and view, your actions in fact should be the model behaviour mimicked by others.

You guys both seem to showboat a bit, but his posts at least seem grounded in a really open, honest approach to life. The above quote reads like character assasination to me, and its kinda ghetto.

Thanks Isaac, I will admit I showboat a little....maybe a lot 😉

I am extremely open from the fact I believe if I can show by example, people may learn not to hide/worry about things so much in their lives.

Things happen, it's part of life, you somehow end up losing a body part, loved one, pet, job, wreck your car, etc....it's just part of things that happen everyday. The fact is worrying about whether or not something bad will happen or suffering about it after it does, just takes away from the rest of the life that's left. Many people live in such fear of simply going to the store for milk in the middle of the night that they go without a lot of things living their lives by the rules other's have placed on them. I lived in a neighborhood of homes where the minimum was about $300k (the average in my area is about $200k I think maybe less)...there were still moms waiting with kids of middle school age for the bus, keeping their children in the car until the bus came...the wierd part of it all is technically they could have just driven them to the school (it's not far really and withing the 10-15mins of waiting for the bus they could have been there). I can see on a rainy day, but seriously how often is someone going to be abducted from a bus stop full of other kids on a street which happens to have a crossing guard 20 feet away. Already though this is developing adults with a unrealistic fear of the world, we were talking to a student about 18-19 and she had all these fears and hangups about situations that were totally wrong...kids believe their parents and if parents are going to misinform them and lie, they will grow up having the wrong information perpetuated.

Kids are going to grow up, they are going to have sex, they may do things in their bedrooms you would never do...but does that make it wrong, why is sex wrong anyway? If you are worried about the pregnacy end....get your child on the birth control pill and also teach them about protection, tell them that while you may not agree with what they do, you will not ground them for simply finding condoms or other devices in their rooms and you will not be counting them to see if they are using them (which doesn't work as if the kid thinks they may 'get lucky' and carry one, it should be thrown away if it's sitting in a purse or wallet pretty quickly so what will happen is they won't use them instead of risking getting in trouble).

Also some things parents say get very misunderstood by the kid....things like you are too young to have a baby, in response to a girl asking about sex for the first time. The daughter sometimes goes away thinking she is still 'sterile' but has not answers about what sex is like....so she finds a boy and tells him she can't get pregnant when he doesn't have protection. Trust me a 13-16 year old is not going to be thinking about AIDS and STDS really....the only STD's they will *usually* encounter at that age are easily treatable, they know this...they aren't stupid....pregnacy is going to be the biggest risk they will face by a long shot. Once you approach the 20's, sexual frequency in people is way ramped up, so STD frequency also is high and there is more risk to permanent non-life threatening STD's like herpes, HPV (non-cervical cancerous), etc and permanent and possibly fatal ones like Hep C, AIDS/HIV, and HPV which can cause cervical cancer, but still the average persons risk for any permanent STD is still very low even if the partner is infected....you don't want to gamble though, so you try to stay protected and avoid those with disease.



 
one last thing I wanted to add....

People can only make fun of you, if you do not feel comfortable about yourself. Once you come to realize the points I made above, there isn't much someone can say about what mistakes you have made, without it sounding hypocritical. Then rather than be upset, simple pick one little detail you know they hate and bring it up, attack it, and beat them down with it....putting them into the shoes they thought you were going to be wearing.
 
Hmmm....one of my mates is like this....he is 22 and his sister is 17 and he keeps going on about killing her boyfriends and being all protective....don't get me wrong....it's a good thing looking out for your family especially your younger sisters but they have to learn to make their own mistakes sometimes.....they are gonna have to take care of themselves.
 
Originally posted by: nan0bug
Originally posted by: luvly
So is this thread dead, alive or what? Hehehe! 😛

"What do I say that I do another?"

All right, I'll give you examples. There are more instances, but here's one: "Hmm no STD's ever....also HPV is a pretty broad condition....many many have that and don't know it. Only a few strains even show symptoms and a few symptomless types are only problematic for females. You spew ignorance sir."

"Even as an adult, I took risks sometimes....almost no one uses protection during oral sex....but that's just as risky, if not more. Again you speak from inexperience/ignorance."

Another one. So what exactly is your point there? You resort to declaring the poster ignorant without establishing the connection. You yourself said things like "almost", "many", etc. so you're admitting that this does not apply to everyone who engages in oral sex or intercourse.

"my point was anyone that says they 100% use protection for every possible encounter including oral sex is lying or has only had a handful of the said encounters."

Then you proceed to try elaborating the above, but instead you end up contradicting yourself. Here you declared that all persons who have engaged in oral sex and other encounters must have at least once failed to use protection otherwise the person's only had a handful of encounters. A dichotomy here, no? It seems inconsistent with your previous statements. You jumped from existential quantifiers to a universal statement. Wouldn't you have to prove every single case? So what qualifies you anymore than the person you're declaring "ignorant" for having a differing view?

Having read your post here: "the funniest part of it all is my mom had been a OB-GYN nurse throughout my high school days, and I was big into Biology, I had a lot of girlfriends but I was afraid to do anything with them and sort of clueless about girls/women at the time. I think I pissed off a lot of them at the time..."

now it seems more understandable why you seem so into the subject of sex and hardly seem to accommodate different views. I guess you moved from one extreme to another. If it didn't seem like such a big deal to you then, it woudn't be a big deal now either to the extent that you seem to feel deprived if you don't get it all the time.

You are contiunally making yourself look like an idiot on this forum by acting like some kind of know-it-all shrink/lawyer/doctor/guru whateverthefvck. Congratulations, you have a big vocabulary.

*golf clap*

That would be true, but half of the time she uses words improperly.
 
Back
Top