• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Ford GT *very nice*

Originally posted by: Xiety
it's a fast car... but for that price, i would never buy it. And, lastly, i think it looks ugly...
Click to expand...

*mental note, disreguard anything Xiety has to say about automobiles*

You'd never buy it because you can't afford it. This thing would hand a Lambo it's ass and try for a second helping.
 
Originally posted by: rbloedow
Originally posted by: Xiety
it's a fast car... but for that price, i would never buy it. And, lastly, i think it looks ugly...
Click to expand...

*mental note, disreguard anything Xiety has to say about automobiles*

You'd never buy it because you can't afford it. This thing would hand a Lambo it's ass and try for a second helping.
Click to expand...

*mental note, remember rbloedow as the as$.

what i wanna say is, i won't buy it because:

1. it's way too expensive for a ford.
2. it's ugly. the original forg gt looked better.
3. when things start breaking down too early, you'll again realize it's a ford and how stupid you were.

and besides, how well do you know my financial situation that you assume i can't buy it? heh..

edit: i would buy this car for 150k only if it had a warranty that was at least 5 years. 3 yrs / 36,000 miles ? Is this a joke? Bleh.
 
Originally posted by: Xiety
Originally posted by: rbloedow
Originally posted by: Xiety it's a fast car... but for that price, i would never buy it. And, lastly, i think it looks ugly...
Click to expand...
*mental note, disreguard anything Xiety has to say about automobiles* You'd never buy it because you can't afford it. This thing would hand a Lambo it's ass and try for a second helping.
Click to expand...
*mental note, remember rbloedow as the as$. what i wanna say is, i won't buy it because: 1. it's way too expensive for a ford. 2. it's ugly. 3. when things start breaking down too early, you'll again realize it's a ford and how stupid you were. and besides, how well do you know my financial situation that you assume i can't buy it? heh..
Click to expand...

rolleye.gif
Thankyou for confirming that you're a dumbass.
 
Originally posted by: rbloedow
Originally posted by: Xiety
Originally posted by: rbloedow
Originally posted by: Xiety it's a fast car... but for that price, i would never buy it. And, lastly, i think it looks ugly...
Click to expand...
*mental note, disreguard anything Xiety has to say about automobiles* You'd never buy it because you can't afford it. This thing would hand a Lambo it's ass and try for a second helping.
Click to expand...
*mental note, remember rbloedow as the as$. what i wanna say is, i won't buy it because: 1. it's way too expensive for a ford. 2. it's ugly. 3. when things start breaking down too early, you'll again realize it's a ford and how stupid you were. and besides, how well do you know my financial situation that you assume i can't buy it? heh..
Click to expand...

rolleye.gif
Thankyou for confirming that you're a dumbass.
Click to expand...

rolleye.gif
Thankyou for comfirming that you're a moron.
 
Originally posted by: Xiety
Originally posted by: rbloedow
Originally posted by: Xiety
it's a fast car... but for that price, i would never buy it. And, lastly, i think it looks ugly...
Click to expand...

*mental note, disreguard anything Xiety has to say about automobiles*

You'd never buy it because you can't afford it. This thing would hand a Lambo it's ass and try for a second helping.
Click to expand...

*mental note, remember rbloedow as the as$.

what i wanna say is, i won't buy it because:

1. it's way too expensive for a ford.
2. it's ugly. the original forg gt looked better.
3. when things start breaking down too early, you'll again realize it's a ford and how stupid you were.

and besides, how well do you know my financial situation that you assume i can't buy it? heh..

edit: i would buy this car for 150k only if it had a warranty that was at least 5 years. 3 yrs / 36,000 miles ? Is this a joke? Bleh.
Click to expand...

shamelessly ripped from vwvortex....

"Um... so what would you call the whopping 24 month warranty you get on a $140k Ferrari 360 Modena? Sure, the Ferrari one is unlimited mileage, but you still have to pay maintenance, which is a FORTUNE on those cars. In terms of total cost of ownership, the Ford should win by a mile. Porsche is slightly better in warranty than the Ford; offering 4 years / 50k miles, but again, maintenance on Porsches can vary wildly. A good Porsche shop can keep your car in tip-top shape quite affordably. The dealer or a not so cost-conscious shop will eat you alive. I have trouble believing that anything with a Ford nameplate is going to be as expensive to maintain as either of the other two legitimate players in the $130-150k arena."
 
Originally posted by: Xiety
*mental note, remember rbloedow as the as$.

what i wanna say is, i won't buy it because:

1. it's way too expensive for a ford.
2. it's ugly. the original forg gt looked better.
3. when things start breaking down too early, you'll again realize it's a ford and how stupid you were.

and besides, how well do you know my financial situation that you assume i can't buy it? heh..

edit: i would buy this car for 150k only if it had a warranty that was at least 5 years. 3 yrs / 36,000 miles ? Is this a joke? Bleh.
Click to expand...
1) What the hell does the badge on the front have anything to do with the engineering of a vehicle which ultimately decides a vehicle's cost?
2) This Ford GT looks nearly identical to the original - the main differences being the size.
3) Ferrari currently offers a two year, unlimited mile warranty on the 360 Modena. Meanwhile, most Ferrari models are notorious for reliability issues. Lambasting Ford for problems with their quality is akin to saying "Kia sucks, I'm buying a Hyundai instead!"

 
Okay, a few people in this thread need to stop posting on car forums.

Sure, it may just be a Ford, but I would bank on Ford having better reliability then Lambo and Ferrari. Remember the entire Jaguar fiasco? Jags sucked massive monkey pole until Ford took over production. Also, when you talk about relieability and service on everyday grocery-getters, that is an entirely different then when talking about 'super' cars such as this vehicle.

 
Originally posted by: Babbles
Okay, a few people in this thread need to stop posting on car forums.

Sure, it may just be a Ford, but I would bank on Ford having better reliability then Lambo and Ferrari. Remember the entire Jaguar fiasco? Jags sucked massive monkey pole until Ford took over production. Also, when you talk about relieability and service on everyday grocery-getters, that is an entirely different then when talking about 'super' cars such as this vehicle.
Click to expand...

Yes, I agree and tend not to think (ala-consumer reports style) about reliability first when looking at supercars. To me, the performance matters more than the manufacturer.
 
First of all this a sweet ride no matter who makes it. As for people ripping on Ford, I have never owned a Ford and probably never will, but you have to understand that Ford is actually a capable company. They can make extemely well crafted, reliable cars and they often do. The problem is that they usually don't make those cars for the US market where they have to compete with the like of GM, Kia, Hyundai etc. on price and volume, so don't discount Ford because of what you see on the road. Given the complexities and manufacturing and selling a domestic car in the US (unions, massive competition, need to clear out their over production) they do a pretty good job.

As for the GT - this is a damn nice car, they made sure to engineer this car to the limit and it will show.
 
Originally posted by: TechnoKid
Originally posted by: Babbles Okay, a few people in this thread need to stop posting on car forums. Sure, it may just be a Ford, but I would bank on Ford having better reliability then Lambo and Ferrari. Remember the entire Jaguar fiasco? Jags sucked massive monkey pole until Ford took over production. Also, when you talk about relieability and service on everyday grocery-getters, that is an entirely different then when talking about 'super' cars such as this vehicle.
Click to expand...
Yes, I agree and tend not to think (ala-consumer reports style) about reliability first when looking at supercars. To me, the performance matters more than the manufacturer.
Click to expand...

True, Consumer reports is the last place an enthusiast would go. "Let me see.... well this car has cup holders that block the stereo controls.... so maybe we should rate the car lower than this one that has these simply magnificent cup holders that hold my drink oh so well." - the inner workings of the mind of a consumer reports writer.
 
If you can afford a $150K car you arent worried about the warranty. I heard that they got a preproduction car to run an 11.59 in the quarter and that isnt even what the car is designed for.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top