For Those Who Say "Jet Fuel Can't Melt Steel Beams"

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,580
12,680
136
There have been multiple demonstrations that it's more than just possible. Discovery channel comes to mind.
Still won't convince, people who seem to need conspiracy in their lives, because they can't stand their own lives and need to live in delusion. They'd have to work out their own problems otherwise, and that's like death for many people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zinfamous and pmv

amenx

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2004
4,707
2,999
136
I think some arguments would be that the impact and resulting fireball would have burned up most of the fuel. If not, how did the fuel magically seep onto and cover the steel beams all the way to the bottom floors where the buildings began to crumble and collapse? Then there is the matter that heat rises. It doesnt move downward. At the impact areas and where the heat was greatest, the steel beams would have begun to collapse from there. Again, how did the buildings crumble and collapse starting from the lowest floors where there were no signs of fire?

I think the matter raised that steel beams only melt at certain temps is a red herring. There are too many other issues with bigger question marks.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,580
12,680
136
I think some arguments would be that the impact and resulting fireball would have burned up most of the fuel. If not, how did the fuel magically seep onto and cover the steel beams all the way to the bottom floors where the buildings began to crumble and collapse? Then there is the matter that hear rises. It doesnt move downward. At the impact areas and where the heat was greatest, the steel beams would have begun to collapse from there. Again, how did the buildings crumble and collapse starting from the lowest floors where there were no signs of fire?

I think the matter raised that steel beams only melt at certain temps is a red herring. There are too many other issues with bigger question marks.
Just stop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NTMBK and feralkid

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,319
31,374
136
I think some arguments would be that the impact and resulting fireball would have burned up most of the fuel. If not, how did the fuel magically seep onto and cover the steel beams all the way to the bottom floors where the buildings began to crumble and collapse? Then there is the matter that heat rises. It doesnt move downward. At the impact areas and where the heat was greatest, the steel beams would have begun to collapse from there. Again, how did the buildings crumble and collapse starting from the lowest floors where there were no signs of fire?

I think the matter raised that steel beams only melt at certain temps is a red herring. There are too many other issues with bigger question marks.
Fuck you’re an idiot.
 

amenx

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2004
4,707
2,999
136
I'll take "What is an earthquake?" for 100, Alex.
Not Alex. Literally 1000s of architects and engineers have voiced their opinion on the matter questioning the official findings. Re WTC 7, I guess we have to take Larry Silversteins word on it that they decided to "pull" the building.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
Goddammit... Can't say I missed these stupid conspiracies.

What's the overlap with 911 truthers, Qanon, 2020 election conspirators, and anti vaxxers?
 

VW MAN

Senior member
Jun 27, 2020
677
861
136
I think some arguments would be that the impact and resulting fireball would have burned up most of the fuel. If not, how did the fuel magically seep onto and cover the steel beams all the way to the bottom floors where the buildings began to crumble and collapse? Then there is the matter that heat rises. It doesnt move downward. At the impact areas and where the heat was greatest, the steel beams would have begun to collapse from there. Again, how did the buildings crumble and collapse starting from the lowest floors where there were no signs of fire?

I think the matter raised that steel beams only melt at certain temps is a red herring. There are too many other issues with bigger question marks.
Then there is the matter of bldg 7.
This weak minded moron and his bullshit needs to fuck right off!
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,641
13,334
136
You don't necessarily even need to melt the steel. Just raise its temperature to the point where the strength sufficiently degraded.
Not sure why I'm bothering to post tbh
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,838
20,433
146
You don't necessarily even need to melt the steel. Just raise its temperature to the point where the strength sufficiently degraded.
Not sure why I'm bothering to post tbh

At this point, even if it was a gubbermint conspiracy, we've proceeded well past that to the point of the gubbermint getting whatever it was they wanted.
 

amenx

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2004
4,707
2,999
136
The official report summarized by the always partisan popular mechanics (/s):

No mention of WTC owner Larry Silverstein saying the building was "pulled". He is on record saying that.

And btw, not arguing about any US govt conspiracy theory, that is another red herring. In fact, I dont think the US govt had any involvement at all. Just pointing to a few inconvenient details that may lead in a different direction. Silverstein, close confidant of Netanyahu, bought the WTC towers 2 months before the events and insured them for $3 billion. Who knows, maybe nothing to it. Just inconvenient details. The plane that was brought down in Pennsylvania, hmm.. wonder where it was going? ... maybe WTC 7?

Not arguing in favor of any definitive conspiracy theory. Just the matter remains that these are interesting details which fit in perfectly with Netanyahus vision of what could be done in the Mid-east given the 'right circumstances'. Plus, we do have a record of Israel targeting US military (USS Liberty) and other assets (Lavon affair) when they figured it may serve their interests
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,319
31,374
136
No mention of WTC owner Larry Silverstein saying the building was "pulled". He is on record saying that.

And btw, not arguing about any US govt conspiracy theory, that is another red herring. In fact, I dont think the US govt had any involvement at all. Just pointing to a few inconvenient details that may lead in a different direction. Silverstein, close confidant of Netanyahu, bought the WTC towers 2 months before the events and insured them for $3 billion. Who knows, maybe nothing to it. Just inconvenient details. The plane that was brought down in Pennsylvania, hmm.. wonder where it was going? ... maybe WTC 7?

Not arguing in favor of any definitive conspiracy theory. Just the matter remains that these are interesting details which fit in perfectly with Netanyahus vision of what could be done in the Mid-east given the 'right circumstances'. Plus, we do have a record of Israel targeting US military (USS Liberty) and other assets (Lavon affair) when they figured it may serve their interests
Oh fuck the Jews did it!

seriously go fuck yourself
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,319
31,374
136
I've done some research and read jet fuel kills covid-19 in vitro. It's something big pharma doesn't want you to know. ;)
It’s especially effective when poured on the body and ignited. In a few minutes all the COVID in your body is destroyed never to return. 100% COVID free and nothing to ever fear in life again!
 

amenx

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2004
4,707
2,999
136
Oh fuck the Jews did it!

seriously go fuck yourself
Oh fuck off with your antisemitism card. Israeli govt or military malfeasance has nothing to do with them being Jews. And you stupidly highlighted established facts that you probably know jack shit about. :p
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,483
6,565
136
I think some arguments would be that the impact and resulting fireball would have burned up most of the fuel. If not, how did the fuel magically seep onto and cover the steel beams all the way to the bottom floors where the buildings began to crumble and collapse? Then there is the matter that heat rises. It doesnt move downward. At the impact areas and where the heat was greatest, the steel beams would have begun to collapse from there. Again, how did the buildings crumble and collapse starting from the lowest floors where there were no signs of fire?

I think the matter raised that steel beams only melt at certain temps is a red herring. There are too many other issues with bigger question marks.
The buildings didn't colipase from the bottom up, the lower floors were clearly intact as the top floors pancaked.
When the structural integrity of a building is impaired by an aircraft crashing into it, then weakened further by fire, collapse isn't a surprising result.
Clearly you won't be swayed by facts in the face of higher truth (what you want to believe), but at least consider the obvious visual evidence before stating fabrications.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,407
136
The buildings didn't colipase from the bottom up, the lower floors were clearly intact as the top floors pancaked.
When the structural integrity of a building is impaired by an aircraft crashing into it, then weakened further by fire, collapse isn't a surprising result.
Clearly you won't be swayed by facts in the face of higher truth (what you want to believe), but at least consider the obvious visual evidence before stating fabrications.

I am quoting this so everyone gets an opportunity to like it twice.
See what @Greenman said above
 

amenx

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2004
4,707
2,999
136
The buildings didn't colipase from the bottom up, the lower floors were clearly intact as the top floors pancaked.
When the structural integrity of a building is impaired by an aircraft crashing into it, then weakened further by fire, collapse isn't a surprising result.
Clearly you won't be swayed by facts in the face of higher truth (what you want to believe), but at least consider the obvious visual evidence before stating fabrications.
Apologies, my mistake re where the collapse began. But doesnt change the fact the official report is still at odds with 1000s of architects and engineers who do not agree with the NIST findings and challenge them to this day. Pancake theory or not, the inconvenient little detail that the owner of WTC 7 said the building was "pulled" remains.
 
Last edited:

VW MAN

Senior member
Jun 27, 2020
677
861
136
Oh fuck off with your antisemitism card. Israeli govt or military malfeasance has nothing to do with them being Jews. And you stupidly highlighted established facts that you probably know jack shit about. :p
Why do people like you need to fill your brains with conspiracy garbage bullshit? What the fuck happened in your life to cause you to become so stupid and broken by choice? Did mommy not love you enough? Did daddy beat you? Did your uncle butt rape you? Were you too high on the day critical thinking was taught in school? Did you suffer a traumatic brain injury as a child? Were you just born stupid? Are you just choosing to be a big cuckhold that you enjoy the abuse your handlers inflict upon you? Like seriously explain why the fuck you refuse to accept reality and choose to embrace the fantastical fiction?

Seriously fuck you and your bullshit!
 

amenx

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2004
4,707
2,999
136
Why do people like you need to fill your brains with conspiracy garbage bullshit? What the fuck happened in your life to cause you to become so stupid and broken by choice? Did mommy not love you enough? Did daddy beat you? Did your uncle butt rape you? Were you too high on the day critical thinking was taught in school? Did you suffer a traumatic brain injury as a child? Were you just born stupid? Are you just choosing to be a big cuckhold that you enjoy the abuse your handlers inflict upon you? Like seriously explain why the fuck you refuse to accept reality and choose to embrace the fantastical fiction?

Seriously fuck you and your bullshit!
Thanks. Thats probably what I would have written when I was 14 years old.