• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Fluoride is a poison

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: rahvin

The following is a list of chemicals used in water treatment. It's extensive and I don't see people getting mad about them but they think Fluoridation is some conspiracy by the government.


Oxygen
That's it! We're all dead!
 

rahvin

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,475
1
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
From Harvey's link...
On January 25, 1945 at 4pm, Grand Rapids, Michigan became a pioneer in public health when it became the first city in the world to fluoridate its drinking water to levels optimal for preventing tooth decay.
Yesss! I finally have a reason to hold my head up and tell people where I live. ;)

It's funny you bring that up, the first time I heard about fluoridation was when I was talking to someone from Michigan many years ago, he was the only person I ever met who hadn't ever had a cavity that wasn't the kid of a dentist.
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: rahvin
Originally posted by: Gaard
From Harvey's link...
On January 25, 1945 at 4pm, Grand Rapids, Michigan became a pioneer in public health when it became the first city in the world to fluoridate its drinking water to levels optimal for preventing tooth decay.
Yesss! I finally have a reason to hold my head up and tell people where I live. ;)

It's funny you bring that up, the first time I heard about fluoridation was when I was talking to someone from Michigan many years ago, he was the only person I ever met who hadn't ever had a cavity that wasn't the kid of a dentist.
It helps to be taught good brushing habits as a kid.



<---- mouth full of fillings.
 

rahvin

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,475
1
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
It helps to be taught good brushing habits as a kid.



<---- mouth full of fillings.

I had good brushing habits as a kid and ended up with multiple fillings in almost all my molars. Fluoridation is there to prevent that, it's an amazingly effective public health measure.
 

daclayman

Golden Member
Sep 27, 2000
1,207
0
76
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: biostud
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
If you've ever seen what fluorine can do to glass you wouldn't want it on your teeth. And when the stuff leaches our of the reservoirs into the atmosphere in high consentrations it's gonna frost all our asses. And just wait till fluorine rain starts falling on the forests and running into the sea to meet the plankton. You have no idea, but then today, who knows anything about science?

There's a great difference in HF (H+ + H-) and other substances with F-.

But there's no difference in the fluorine. U gotta get up real early to fool old Moonbeam.

Moonie's playing with you folk. Fluorine, Chlorine, Iodine (the elements in the same column on the periodic table) are not stable enough to exist on their own. They must attach themsleves to something and these elements prefer the soft metals (Sodium, Lithium, Potassium). These elements would react violently if not attached to something else.

:beer:



 

dannybek2

Senior member
Apr 12, 2005
213
0
0
I am suprised no one mentioned Dr. Strangelove...... I guess all posters are youngins.... :p
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
I know someone who never uses fluoride. Suffice it to say he visits the dentist a lot.

I want to know exactly how much fluoride creates a substantial risk and how much fluroide is in a smudge of toothpaste and how much stays in your mouth if you rinse out. For now I'll keep using fluoride .
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
Originally posted by: Vic
No city in Oregon has fluoridated water. My dentist appreciates my business.
Um, no. I'm pretty damn sure Salem's water is fluoridated.
 

BillyBatson

Diamond Member
May 13, 2001
5,715
1
0
there are lots of thigns in our lives that aren't healthy, flouride is just one of them. It warns you on tothpaste not to swllow more a pea size amount of whatever. You can't panic about every little thing.
I remember reading in the LA times (i don't remember the exact percentage) that you are X-times more likely to get cancer from peanut butter than win the jack pot playing lotto.
everything has something
 

TheGameIs21

Golden Member
Apr 23, 2001
1,329
0
0
Originally posted by: RobCur
A toxic chemical waste products that are put into our drinking water, tooth paste and numberous other products.
Since it is only fatal at high dosage, no one is going to notice but its effect on our health and mental being is disasterous.
http://www.fluoridealert.org/

Simmer down now everyone. Fact is... If you drink too much PURE H2O you can die. Most things (not all) that exist in this world are toxic to a degree. You body doesn't build up levels of Fluoride to toxic levels. It's an in and out chemical. For the person that said there is a monopoly. That is actually not true anylonger. You can drink bottled water instead of from the tap.

I also find it very funny how people choose fluoride to pick on when most every meat has steroids that are passed on. When the air you breath has smoke from cigarettes (and tons of other pollutants). When some of the land you walk on has tons of asbestos buried 50 ft beneath it. When the waterways around some of the most populous cities have measurable levels of prescription drugs in it (from antibiotics to painkillers). If you are going to fight something like this, use your energy trying to get rid of something that is actually harmful to you.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: rahvin
Originally posted by: Gaard
So is Fluoride added to our water as some sort of cleansing agent to make it safer to drink, or is it added strictly to 'benefit' us? Also, is there some kind of government regulation dealing with this? Obviously if there are regulations, they aren't federal (if the 'Oregon' posts are correct), so it's more of a local decision, right? Also, I wonder if there have been any 'dental' studies comparing Oregon to the rest of the nation on the pros and cons of this.

Chlorination is added as a public health measure to prevent disease. Many other chemicals are also added to facilitate this end and even to make the water smell better or taste better. Fluoride is added as a public health measure to prevent teeth decay, which is also a disease.

So if the government is adding chemicals to water to prevent disease why do you insist one is different than the other?

Big difference:
Chlorination and other sanitation methods are used to kill organisms in the water that would make you ill. The organisms are present in the water, therefore the treatment is necessary.

OTOH, flouridation has nothing to do with the water, specifically. The water is just a carrier for a medicine to treat a non-water related ailment, tooth decay.

Why does our water have to be a carrier for medicine? If I have a headache, I take an Excedrin, I don't expect that my water should contain pain killers. If you make the argument that sodium flouride is a "nutrient", why not add vitamin D to the water? Recent studies have shown that many people are deficient in vitamin D. You think flouride has helped you? Take your own flouride supplements.

On another note, I have noticed many "conservatives" supporting this public health measure. I thought you guys typically preferred prayer to public health. Well, guys, leave my teeth to Jesus!
 

kogase

Diamond Member
Sep 8, 2004
5,213
0
0
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Why does our water have to be a carrier for medicine? If I have a headache, I take an Excedrin, I don't expect that my water should contain pain killers. If you make the argument that sodium flouride is a "nutrient", why not add vitamin D to the water? Recent studies have shown that many people are deficient in vitamin D. You think flouride has helped you? Take your own flouride supplements.

I think it was added to the water a while ago when tooth decay among youth had become a national crisis type of thing. You know, for the children. As to vitamin D, that's why it is added to milk.
 

Harvey

Administrator<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
35,059
73
91
Originally posted by: EatSpam
OTOH, flouridation has nothing to do with the water, specifically. The water is just a carrier for a medicine to treat a non-water related ailment, tooth decay.
That's a poor argument for several reasons:

1. Water fluoridation has been proven to be both safe and effective, but it requires long time exposure of a small amount of the fluoride agent.

2. Tooth decay IS a public health issue, especially for children, and especially for the poor. Untreated tooth decay leads directly to tooth loss and further infection of the gums. It is an effective preventive measure which is always preferred over trying to repair disease caused damage, after the fact.

Bottom line, fluoridation is safe, effective and inexpensive, and it saves public funds that would otherwise spent on medical expenses and improves the quality of life.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: EatSpam
OTOH, flouridation has nothing to do with the water, specifically. The water is just a carrier for a medicine to treat a non-water related ailment, tooth decay.
That's a poor argument for several reasons:

1. Water fluoridation has been proven to be both safe and effective, but it requires long time exposure of a small amount of the fluoride agent.

2. Tooth decay IS a public health issue, especially for children, and especially for the poor. Untreated tooth decay leads directly to tooth loss and further infection of the gums. It is an effective preventive measure which is always preferred over trying to repair disease caused damage, after the fact.

Bottom line, fluoridation is safe, effective and inexpensive, and it saves public funds that would otherwise spent on medical expenses and improves the quality of life.

None of what you mentioned is relevant to my argument. There's no reason why you can't take a flouride pill every day if you want long term exposure. I take a multi-vitamin every day. Same idea.

Many things are public health issues, like vaccinations and STDs. But for both those things, you go to a doctor and get appropriate treatment. Why is it ok for a water company, with no medical or dental credentials, to medicate me? And if the poor need flouride, they can go to the public health clinic. Poor kids can get vaccines free of charge based on need at the clinic.

And this little anecdote always amuses me. My father and his brothers all have missing teeth and had many cavities. They grew up drinking flouridated Chicago tap water, had regular dental trips, and brushed with flouridated toothpaste. My father in-law and his daughters grew up drinking nonflouridated well water, never went to the dentist and brush with nonflouridated toothpaste. They have all their teeth and they're bright and white. Not scientific, but its funny that the ultra-flouridated people have horrible teeth and the non-flouridated people have perfect teeth.

On a side note, I hate dentists. I stopped going because everytime I went in, you could see the f*cking $$$ in their eyes because I still have my wisdom teeth.
 

Tommunist

Golden Member
Dec 1, 2004
1,544
0
0
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: EatSpam
OTOH, flouridation has nothing to do with the water, specifically. The water is just a carrier for a medicine to treat a non-water related ailment, tooth decay.
That's a poor argument for several reasons:

1. Water fluoridation has been proven to be both safe and effective, but it requires long time exposure of a small amount of the fluoride agent.

2. Tooth decay IS a public health issue, especially for children, and especially for the poor. Untreated tooth decay leads directly to tooth loss and further infection of the gums. It is an effective preventive measure which is always preferred over trying to repair disease caused damage, after the fact.

Bottom line, fluoridation is safe, effective and inexpensive, and it saves public funds that would otherwise spent on medical expenses and improves the quality of life.

None of what you mentioned is relevant to my argument. There's no reason why you can't take a flouride pill every day if you want long term exposure. I take a multi-vitamin every day. Same idea.

flouride needs to be put right on the teeth - hence flouride treatment at the dentist is done this way

Originally posted by: EatSpam
Many things are public health issues, like vaccinations and STDs. But for both those things, you go to a doctor and get appropriate treatment. Why is it ok for a water company, with no medical or dental credentials, to medicate me? And if the poor need flouride, they can go to the public health clinic. Poor kids can get vaccines free of charge based on need at the clinic.

since a lot of people don't get their kids proper dental care (maybe b/c they have an attitude towards dentists like you have) this is important.


Originally posted by: EatSpam
And this little anecdote always amuses me. My father and his brothers all have missing teeth and had many cavities. They grew up drinking flouridated Chicago tap water, had regular dental trips, and brushed with flouridated toothpaste. My father in-law and his daughters grew up drinking nonflouridated well water, never went to the dentist and brush with nonflouridated toothpaste. They have all their teeth and they're bright and white. Not scientific, but its funny that the ultra-flouridated people have horrible teeth and the non-flouridated people have perfect teeth.

your example is horrible - it would be like saying I knew someone that died of lung cancer who didn't smoke and my great grandma lived to be close to 100 and smoked like a chimney - those medical studies on smoking must be wrong! the ADA has researched this and flouride helps protect your teeth - it's not some foolproof method but it helps.

Originally posted by: EatSpam
On a side note, I hate dentists. I stopped going because everytime I went in, you could see the f*cking $$$ in their eyes because I still have my wisdom teeth.

wisdom teeth extraction isn't a huge job as far as I know (I'll check this out later) - dentists stand to make a lot more money on you later for non-prevantative work which you may need.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: Tommunist
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: EatSpam
OTOH, flouridation has nothing to do with the water, specifically. The water is just a carrier for a medicine to treat a non-water related ailment, tooth decay.
That's a poor argument for several reasons:

1. Water fluoridation has been proven to be both safe and effective, but it requires long time exposure of a small amount of the fluoride agent.

2. Tooth decay IS a public health issue, especially for children, and especially for the poor. Untreated tooth decay leads directly to tooth loss and further infection of the gums. It is an effective preventive measure which is always preferred over trying to repair disease caused damage, after the fact.

Bottom line, fluoridation is safe, effective and inexpensive, and it saves public funds that would otherwise spent on medical expenses and improves the quality of life.

None of what you mentioned is relevant to my argument. There's no reason why you can't take a flouride pill every day if you want long term exposure. I take a multi-vitamin every day. Same idea.

flouride needs to be put right on the teeth - hence flouride treatment at the dentist is done this way

[

I was wondering when someone was going to bring this up. So why put it in water if it has to be applied directly to the teeth?
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: EatSpam
The carcinogens and other impurities are in the water naturally. Flourides are usually in trace amounts too, but in America, we add a whole lot more. I think the water company should be providing water, not trying to medicate me with their additives. I'll go to the dentist or doctor if I want drugs.
Of course there are carcinogens in the water naturally. However, your drinking water supplier (and even your local wastewater treatment facility) add carcinogens in trace amounts to kill the bad stuff in the water. You're welcome to protest the decision of your drinking water supplier by not purchasing his product, of course, but your concerns are based on misinformation, not science.

Water is always a monopoly. I can't choose between competing water companies for my tap water.

Still, my question remains: Why should the water company force medication (flouride TREATS weak teeth) on a populace?

not if you live on a well system it's not. Oh, and it won't be flouridated either. Just don't complain when the cavities start hitting.
 

irwincur

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2002
1,899
0
0
There is one town in Michigan that still has a private non flouridated water system. The instances of tooth decay are more than 25% greater than anywhere else in the State. Pretty conclusive evidence if you ask me. Not to mention, there are also plenty of other chemicals in modern water - should probably worry about them first.

However, if you don't like it, just buy spring water and bottled water.
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Originally posted by: EatSpam
The carcinogens and other impurities are in the water naturally. Flourides are usually in trace amounts too, but in America, we add a whole lot more. I think the water company should be providing water, not trying to medicate me with their additives. I'll go to the dentist or doctor if I want drugs.
Of course there are carcinogens in the water naturally. However, your drinking water supplier (and even your local wastewater treatment facility) add carcinogens in trace amounts to kill the bad stuff in the water. You're welcome to protest the decision of your drinking water supplier by not purchasing his product, of course, but your concerns are based on misinformation, not science.

Water is always a monopoly. I can't choose between competing water companies for my tap water.

Still, my question remains: Why should the water company force medication (flouride TREATS weak teeth) on a populace?

not if you live on a well system it's not. Oh, and it won't be flouridated either. Just don't complain when the cavities start hitting.

Actually, a whole-house water filter that will filter flouride is on the list to buy with my 2005 tax return. If I get cavities, it will be the result of bad genetics. My dad has had flouride treatments and all the ADA BS all his life and still lost teeth and had cavaties.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
I'm in my fifties and this was a hot topic when I was in grade school among the John Birch society types (think right wing aluminum foil hat characters). Simple fact-both my wife and I grew up in (seperate) suburbs with fluoridated water. Our kids mostly drank well water (no flouride) as they grew up, and despite having flouride in their toothpaste, our kids had far more cavities than we ever did.

Look at the demand for dentists today-it's far less than it used to me.

There's a lot of other legit concerns to worry about in this world than a silly fluoride conspirarcy.
 

rahvin

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,475
1
0
Originally posted by: EatSpam
I was wondering when someone was going to bring this up. So why put it in water if it has to be applied directly to the teeth?

So how do you swallow water without it touching your teeth? Sounds like some yoga like oral move. I do have a good question though, if you are so ignorant of fluoride, how it works and what it does why do you oppose it? Fear of the unknown?
 

EatSpam

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
6,423
0
0
Originally posted by: rahvin
Originally posted by: EatSpam
I was wondering when someone was going to bring this up. So why put it in water if it has to be applied directly to the teeth?

So how do you swallow water without it touching your teeth? Sounds like some yoga like oral move. I do have a good question though, if you are so ignorant of fluoride, how it works and what it does why do you oppose it? Fear of the unknown?

When I was a kid, I used to get those flouride treatments at the dentist. I used to have to sit in the chair with that nasty concentrated flouride gel for 5 or 10 minutes, then I couldn't wash my mouth out for 30 minutes. Do you hold water in your mouth for extended periods of time to get the "full effect" of the flouride? Doubtful.

Regarding my supposed ignorance: I heard all the ADA evidence and heard all the lectures at school about the magic of flouride. I just don't buy it and I think its insane that a population, as a whole, should be medicated with out each individual consulting a medical professional.

Most of Europe and Japan is unflouridated: Text