Ichinisan
Lifer
- Oct 9, 2002
- 28,298
- 1,234
- 136
People mentioned something about him beating up a bus driver or something. Is it mentioned in his twitter feed?
Not sure. His face looks swollen in the profile picture.
:awe:
FTFY:
People mentioned something about him beating up a bus driver or something. Is it mentioned in his twitter feed?
:awe:
Tattooed up at 17 with GOLD teeth, who funded those?
Also I am not buying anyone getting suspended for TEN DAYS doing something very minor. I can agree they probably were being honest about it being non-violent...but let's see the referral and school paperwork.
I'm a bit late to the party, but here are my thoughts. This isn't a case of racism, in my opinion. At least not in the initial instead, perhaps in the investigation though.
But the initial shooting I think this is a strong case of HORRIBLE usage of a CCW permit. This is the reason people are scared of gun-toting CCWers. Many of them are extremely irresponsible and are just looking for a reason to use their gun. I give you exhibit A. If you are carrying a gun, you have absolutely ZERO business stalking someone.
How do you conclude that?!
As the neighborhood watch coordinator, he had an obligation to follow suspicious people in the gated neighborhood. He also has an increased need to protect himself and this proved to be the case.
I think we all should have the right to defend ourselves in exactly the same way.
What he got suspended for has nothing to do with this situation, in court you can't bring up past shit. If you could Z would be rotting in jail because he has actual runs in with the law in his past. People *racistscoughcough* are digging for anything to discredit T. "ZOMG he might have sold weed!!!"
If I had to guess his gold fronts were actually the fake kind you can order out of the back of The Source magazine for 50 bucks. Or maybe he worked? I mean when I was younger than him I bought a 14.4k modem which cost me $650 cash. As for Tat's they're cheap unless you want something big and fancy. And they're free if you know somebody with a tat gun.
I read his twitter, it's typical twitter lame bullshit, if it says anything about him as a person, he's about as horny as I was at 17. All I saw was him trying to holler at females.
He wasn't even part of the neighbor hood watch though, he was nothing more a self appointed vigilante. Which is kind of fitting for what transpired. And it shows why the rest of the neighborhood watch wisely had avoided him in the past.
Wikipedia said:Wendy Dorival, who organizes Neighborhood Watch for the Sanford Police Department, told the Sentinel in a recent interview that Zimmerman was chosen as a watch coordinator by his neighbors.[45]
He could have been beaten to death if he didn't have a gun...-but you think he should lose the right to protect himself because he's in a position that might lead to dangerous encounters...?!I dunno if you've ever been involved in a neighborhood watch program, but they never carry guns, not any in any of the neighborhoods I've lived in. I mean the group has the name watch right in it. Which to me signifies you watch, nothing else.
How do you conclude that?!
As the neighborhood watch coordinator, he had an obligation to follow suspicious people in the gated neighborhood. He also has an increased need to protect himself and this proved to be the case.
I think we all should have the right to defend ourselves in exactly the same way.
I conclude that by the fact that he was literally following and even chased Trayvon at one point in time, AFTER the police told him to stop. That's irresponsible. As a gun owner, you should be looking to AVOID conflict, not create it. Regardless of whether or not the shooting was self defense, I can't completely fault Trayvon for turning and attacking someone who was following and even chased him. There are two outcomes if someone is chasing you. Flight or Fight and both of them are understandable.
Bottom line though. If you are carrying a gun, you look for every opportunity to AVOID conflict, not create it.
How do you conclude that?!
As the neighborhood watch coordinator, he had an obligation to follow suspicious people in the gated neighborhood. He also has an increased need to protect himself and this proved to be the case.
I think we all should have the right to defend ourselves in exactly the same way.
When volunteers join a Neighborhood Watch group in St. Petersburg, they sign a waiver.
They will not approach suspects. They will not detain people. They won't carry weapons.
Chris Tutko, director of Neighborhood Watch for the National Sheriffs' Association, said Zimmerman broke some cardinal rules.
First, he approached a stranger he suspected of wrongdoing.
"If you see something suspicious, you report it, you step aside and you let law enforcement do their job," Tutko said. "This guy went way beyond the call of duty. At the least, he's overzealous."
Second, Zimmerman carried a handgun. Police departments and sheriff's offices that train volunteers advise them never to carry weapons though Zimmerman broke no laws by doing so because he has a concealed-weapons permit.
"There's no reason to carry a gun," Tutko said.
Actually, Martin's mother is testifying in front of Congress tomorrow about Stand Your Ground. Also, FL Rep Dwayne Taylor plans to introduce a bill to repeal Stand Your Ground.
Also,
Policy of caution guides Neighborhood Watch groups
Too bad, his dad's finance didn't live in St. Petersburg.
Zimmerman was not following Neighborhood Watch 'rules'
Did you listen to the 911 calls? He was apparently being beaten for several minutes, screaming for help before he finally used the gun. Before that point, he was only doing his job.
A couple of people thought it was Trayvon Martin screaming (it was not), so people took those statements and ran with it.
Also, if you listen to the call, the 911 dispatcher didn't actually order him to stop. It was like this:
"Are you following him?"
"Yeah."
"We don't need you to do that."
...and a 911 dispatcher is not a police officer. They can only give advice and have no authority.
Just a thought but if Zimmerman is white than so is Obama and if that's true Obama should have shut hie pie hole and stayed the hell out of it. Never has a president so easily pull the race trigger and insert himself into a racial situation without knowing the facts. The professor in Boston comes to mind. What I don't understand is why isn't Latinos marching raising hell about one of their own being railroaded. FFS there's supposedly a 10k bounty on his head.
Ah, phooey. How many blacks were gunned down just last weekend in Chicago? Across the country? Where's the outrage for that? It's all political bullshit. Period.
I'd recommend those that really want some incite to check out all the google cache links from his facebook/twitter.
Definitely a guy I wouldn't feel safe having live next door to me.
They is even a story he beat up a bus driver on those pages.
i love how, "we don't need you to do that" is code for, "you must stop and go back to your vehicle."
i love how, "we don't need you to do that" is code for, "you must stop and go back to your vehicle."
What he got suspended for has nothing to do with this situation, in court you can't bring up past shit. If you could Z would be rotting in jail because he has actual runs in with the law in his past. People *racistscoughcough* are digging for anything to discredit T. "ZOMG he might have sold weed!!!"
If I had to guess his gold fronts were actually the fake kind you can order out of the back of The Source magazine for 50 bucks. Or maybe he worked? I mean when I was younger than him I bought a 14.4k modem which cost me $650 cash. As for Tat's they're cheap unless you want something big and fancy. And they're free if you know somebody with a tat gun.
I read his twitter, it's typical twitter lame bullshit, if it says anything about him as a person, he's about as horny as I was at 17. All I saw was him trying to holler at females.
Panthers are on the scene:
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...0120324_1_sanford-vigilante-justice-black-men
what did I say...