Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
First of all, nobody can provide any actual proof that explosives were previously planted. Someone in WTC7 would have had to have known that demo charges were being planted at some point because it's a long, drawn out process that requires some heavy duty modification to a building. It wasn't done during the construction process because 1) the building plans show no demolition charges and 2) nearly the entire process of the building of the WTC towers and buildings was photodoc'd and there's no indication of such charges being preset.Originally posted by: morkinva
tasteslikechicken, you have completely avoided the question of their ability (as indicated by Silverstein) to bring down a building on command which requires explosives that were previously planted.
Second of all, when he siad "pull it" he's referring to the firefighting effort on the building. It was a futile effort, they realized that, the fire department called Silverstein and advised him it was futile, and he advised them to "pull it" ("it" being the fire fighting effort).
Now please stop looking for conspiracies behind because some idiot hears the words "pull it" and "pull" and decides to make an out of context ASSumption to align with his personal loonie meanderings that the goevrnment is behind everything bad so they must be behind 9/11 too..
I'm not sure why people ignore that fact that there was a 6,000 gallon fuel tank sitting 15 feet above the ground floor. This combined with the damage done by the falling Trade Center buildings would be very likely to cause the same type of circumstances which brought down the two towers, i.e. enormous structural damage combined with large quantities of burning fuel.