"Whatever the reason, make sure you understand that at this point in this lifetime, you may have been expunged from the path of inquiry (Dharma) due to the karmaphala and vAsanAs of previous janmAs"
I do not understand. Based on my life.. I think I may be qualified to attain moksha.
Baasha, you think I have veered off the path of attaining moksha due to the fact that I consider myself not a follower of hinduism. Your words are very similar to those Mormons who pester me regularly.
I don't give a crap regarding what happens after I die. What matters to me is the way I lead my life.. this life.
"Whatever the reason, make sure you understand that at this point in this lifetime, you may have been expunged from the path of inquiry (Dharma) due to the karmaphala and vAsanAs of previous janmAs"
I do not understand. Based on my life.. I think I may be qualified to attain moksha.
Baasha, you think I have veered off the path of attaining moksha due to the fact that I consider myself not a follower of hinduism. Your words are very similar to those Mormons who pester me regularly.
I don't give a crap regarding what happens after I die. What matters to me is the way I lead my life.. this life.
If you think I am being materialistic.. What about you? Just give up all the material wealth you have...
Many of us in the western world have such a poor understanding of Hinduism, and the many variations.
All I'm saying is that there is a reason why you are rejecting the cultural aspect of VarnASramA Dharma. Find that reason out. If you're simply going to state you dislike it and not do any research into it, you will be as blind as the so-called "blindly" religious folks you and other "rationalists" have contempt for. I'm not talking about mOkSA etc. You are absolutely free to make any choice "you" want. Yet, turn the gaze inward to find out the reason(s) why you have arrived at such a conclusion or else the whole purpose of rejection itself will become futile.
Religious experience, the wise ones say, is the culmination of our experiences past and present.
I just do not want to be associated with any religion.. period.
So who is going to decide that I am on the right path? You say it is me who has to decide.. I do not like the belief that "my fate" is decided at the time of my birth.. I am the master of my own destiny. It is not god or someone else's business to dictate the way I lead my life. It is not my karmaphala.. did god predict that I would be born not by natural way, but by c-section procedure.. I or anyone else can choose at which time a baby is born.. they might as well choose the best possible muhurat for that too. What about test-tube babies? How can planets and stars determine my fate? What about vaastu shastra and Jaatakam. How can it effect the way I lead my life?
Were Dravidians forced to followed the faith and beliefs of Aryans? A forced conversion seems plausible in that sense. It has not yet been established what religion they believed in.
Why are they two major sects in Brahmin community, one who believes in Vishnu and the other in Shiva?
Just like the two atheists at Columbine that committed mass murder against their fellow innocent school mates, Christian and atheist alike.
Or how about those atheists in East Texas that burned down several Christian churces not too long ago?
Tell me atheists affect no one with a straight face.
You cant.
Atheists affect no one with pushing for policy change.. why? how do you push for change based on a lack of belief?
And it is always funny when people like you try to link one atheist to another. A lack of a belief in something doesn't link people. NOT believing in unicorns doesn't link anyone together.
It is equivalent to me saying that non unicorn believers have caused every war in the history of man.
Religious politicians in every country push their personal religious beliefs down everyone's throats on a daily basis.
Is this even a serious question? You believe in the "Aryan Invasion Theory"?
So what is the issue if there are two or more sects or seemingly divergent philosophies within Hinduism? That is the beauty of Hinduism; it has a path for people of ALL temperaments, even atheists.
I was just being facetious. The point is.. I just don't care. I haven't read the book.. I'll give it a read once the price drops or my library picks it up. Aryan migration theory may be a fabrication by Europeans, it is mainly based on anecdotes. But genetically there are two mainly different ancestral groups namely; Ancestral North Indian and Ancestral South Indian. It is quite apparent just by observing the physical features.. and report suggest that there has been an integration of sorts(Due to the fact that it happened ~40,000 years ago).
Religious practices in IVC have not been conclusive as of yet... few believe they practiced an early form of Hinduism.
Yes, but what if I tell you that people who follow different paths discriminate each other.. even from the same caste(This is true especially in Brahmin communities like Iyer and Iyangar). I agree with you mostly on the concept of Sanata Dhrama, but I am getting fed up of its implementation.
You have no clue how I lead my life, and also you have no Idea the level of discrimination people face in India.. just because they were born into a lower caste. As I have previously said, learning about the religion can be a very good academic exercise(or which ever way you feel is right), but being a part of it is not possible for me.
The epics of Ramayan and Mahabharat are just metaphors.. there are a lot of people who believe them to be actual historical accounts.
Yup. They are metaphors too.. IMO.Also, if they are just metaphors, why don't you stress the same fact about Abrahamic religions? Don't tell me you believe that Jesus rose from the dead like a zombie? Or what about Muhammad? Frothing at the mouth in a cave in the desert flew away on a horse to "heaven"? And Moses? Talking to a burning bush? You think those are metaphorical too right?
Keep an open mind and read about it more instead of blithely stating something to make a point.
You can say what you have publicly and certain people, who are so arrogant and mistake kindness for weakness, constantly stomp on the sensibilities of Hindus like that piece of shit MF Hussain. If that bastard had drawn that Muhammad, even clothed, let alone naked, he would have been killed. It is only because he insulted Hindus and Hinduism time and again he got away with it and not only that, to add insult to injury, many secularists in India gave him a "prize" and consider him a "great" artist.
Do you see the Iyers and Iyengars vying to cut off each others' heads?
What made you decide to give it up? Do you still believe in a god of any kind, or are you completely rejecting creationism?
From a metaphysical position,^^ yeah I got caught up with my studies. Belief in what? In god..in religion? I said in my op that I don't think Hinduism is bad( when compared to abrahamic religions) that said.. In general human kind would be better off without it.
Given enough time.. I think we humans can crack a lot of mysteries.
I am not sure about your question.. Can you be more specific?
If your belief system (was going to say religion but I want to use a broader word) is a burden you are following the wrong belief system.
Now here's what makes me laugh about atheists, maybe not all of them, but lot are very die hard and will try to shove their (ironicly) belief system down everyone's throat. Oh sure some belief systems are like that too... but see what I'm saying, atheist is nothing more than another belief system. People switch to atheist thinking they are getting away from it all, but no, it's just another system.
So you just replaced one burden with another.
Now try to think of a logical way that the universe was formed. Everything has a beginning, if not, that's kinda breaking a law of physics. You can't create or destroy energy, such as individual atoms that make up matter, that's breaking a law of physics too. So how, in a world with zero supernatural force, could the universe have been created? To start this world, a force beyond it had to initiate it.
It is impossible for a computer program to have "always existed". Some force that is beyond the system in which this program exists, had to create it. We all live inside a computer program, somebody had to design and build it and us. Think about it. This program we live in is actually the beta version of what our programmer has prepared for us, we just need to set our heart bit to 1 to allow our father to grant us full access to the new system. It has better redundancy, it never shuts down. It is eternal. It is a gift to us for believing. All others simply get discarded into the depths of the last SVN revision ever, eventually forgotten. Alone. Darkness. Deprecation, Death.... Hell.
But more importantly, why is the rum gone?
If your belief system (was going to say religion but I want to use a broader word) is a burden you are following the wrong belief system.
Now here's what makes me laugh about atheists, maybe not all of them, but lot are very die hard and will try to shove their (ironicly) belief system down everyone's throat. Oh sure some belief systems are like that too... but see what I'm saying, atheist is nothing more than another belief system. People switch to atheist thinking they are getting away from it all, but no, it's just another system.
So you just replaced one burden with another.
Now try to think of a logical way that the universe was formed. Everything has a beginning, if not, that's kinda breaking a law of physics. You can't create or destroy energy, such as individual atoms that make up matter, that's breaking a law of physics too. So how, in a world with zero supernatural force, could the universe have been created? To start this world, a force beyond it had to initiate it.
It is impossible for a computer program to have "always existed". Some force that is beyond the system in which this program exists, had to create it. We all live inside a computer program, somebody had to design and build it and us. Think about it. This program we live in is actually the beta version of what our programmer has prepared for us, we just need to set our heart bit to 1 to allow our father to grant us full access to the new system. It has better redundancy, it never shuts down. It is eternal. It is a gift to us for believing. All others simply get discarded into the depths of the last SVN revision ever, eventually forgotten. Alone. Darkness. Deprecation, Death.... Hell.
But more importantly, why is the rum gone?
First- was your sect of hinduism, theistic or atheistic. Some hindu sect believe in the soul and reincarnation but do not believe in a creator god, that is seperate from its creation.
However are you denouncing religion or have you metaphysically decided against 1) a god, 2) any afterlife .
Fourth - many on this forum have, reached the position that they hold either through anger at religion or a refusal to realize that science and phylosophy, especially metaphysics can be used to support their belief in atheism, I urge you to use you own mind to determine what you believe and why you believe so. Ridiculing the opposite position has never been an adequate agrument, there for simply saying that one belief or the other is silly or fanciful is a poor argument.
There is also an interesting video by Carl Sagan(RIP) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4E-_DdX8Ke0.Oh.. and I truly love it when he refers to trees as our cousins. I certaily don't know if what he said in the video is true or not, but it definitely is an interesting theory.In Hindu mythology there is a wonderful story that describes how the gods and the demons once formed an alliance to produce a nectar that could give them immortality. This is the story of the churning of the milk-ocean and the descent of Lord Visnu as the Kurma avatara, the divine tortoise. When the nectar that was churned from this ocean was being served to the gods, a demon, disguised as a god, sat between the Sun and the Moon in an attempt to procure the nectar. When he was detected by the Sun and the Moon, Lord Visnu immediately severed his head from his body. Unfortunately, it was not fast enough, for the demon had already tasted a small quantity of the nectar and had become immortal. Ever since, this demon is said to wreak vengeance on the Sun and Moon whenever they come near. The head of this great demon is known as Rahu and his tail is known as Ketu.
In Hindu astrology Rahu and Ketu are known as two invisible planets. They are enemies of the Sun and the Moon, who at certain times of the year (during conjunction or opposition) swallow the Sun or the Moon causing either a solar or a lunar eclipse. In Sanskrit this is known as grahanam or seizing.
What perhaps sounds like a childish story is a powerful metaphor for what actually happens when an eclipse takes place. Rahu and Ketu are the astronomical points in the sky respectively called the north and south lunar nodes.
My soul dies with me.. If I die, I die. People tend to associate death as an act of god or fate, I would rather think as it it to be a natural death or accidental(Which is purely coincidental). Also, when I die... I know the people who care about me will feel sad.. or the people who truly hate me will be happy/relieved. That is where my life ends and my legacy begins.Have you adopted a position that there is no soul (?chakra?), no reincarnation, no heaven/hell.
This is patently false. Atheism is defined by what a person does not believe. Not believing a god exists is not a belief system. Not collecting stamps is not a hobby, as the classic example goes. You are simply mistaken....but see what I'm saying, atheist is nothing more than another belief system. People switch to atheist thinking they are getting away from it all, but no, it's just another system.
Please demonstrate first that the universe was "formed."Now try to think of a logical way that the universe was formed.
Which law would that be, Einstein?Everything has a beginning, if not, that's kinda breaking a law of physics.
You have yet to demonstrate that the universe began at all. Even granting such a beginning, there's no reason to think that our universe was not begun by the termination of an earlier universe. Ever think of that one, genius?You can't create or destroy energy, such as individual atoms that make up matter, that's breaking a law of physics too. So how, in a world with zero supernatural force, could the universe have been created? To start this world, a force beyond it had to initiate it.
Why's that? Because you say so? Because you can't imagine how it could happen?It is impossible for a computer program to have "always existed".
You just got done saying that it is impossible for a computer program to have an infinite past, but you have no problem allowing for a computer program to have an infinite future.Some force that is beyond the system in which this program exists, had to create it. We all live inside a computer program, somebody had to design and build it and us. Think about it. This program we live in is actually the beta version of what our programmer has prepared for us, we just need to set our heart bit to 1 to allow our father to grant us full access to the new system. It has better redundancy, it never shuts down. It is eternal.