ThinClient
Diamond Member
- Jan 28, 2013
- 3,977
- 4
- 0
Oh look. Another moron who puts words in my mouth because I dare disagree with him.
 
	Oh look. Another moron who puts words in my mouth because I dare disagree with him.
 
	Labeling is fear mongering.
So what if its snake oil. Consumers do not need to know.
For trans fats the market should decide.
For trans fats the market should decide.
If it's not in the jurisdiction of the "Food and Drug Administration" to regulate what constitutes "food," why bother having the FDA at all?
Look at it this way. The market wants trans fat. The public knows trans fat is monumentally dangerous but they don't care. The buy products anyway, leading to increased health problems.
NOBODY GIVES A FUCK.
The FDA is stepping in to protect us from ourselves.
For trans fats the market should decide.
So where do you draw the line. If it's unhealthy and causes severe medical issues, the FDA should stay out of it?
I saw the headline this morning and didn't read the article. I am only against it due to it being more needless regulation. All in the name of good, for people who can't be bothered to look after their own health.
/thinking out loud
Which begs the question: Why do we have a system that incentivizes cost cutting to the point of being detrimental to our own health in the first place? It seems like there are misplaced priorities..? Maybe I'm just crazy.
/thinking out loud
Which begs the question: Why do we have a system that incentivizes cost cutting to the point of being detrimental to our own health in the first place? It seems like there are misplaced priorities..? Maybe I'm just crazy.
Technically speaking cigarettes are still sold legally. Pure poison in packs of 20, zero actual health benefits, just a mountain of money behind it.
The public doesn't know which party Barack Obama affiliates with, but you expect us to believe they know not only that trans-fats are bad, but which products they are contained in?
I don't think PTFE burns really at all to begin with. I've heated PTFE tubing in a flame before, it doesn't touch it. The C-F bond is much stronger than the C-O bond -> no combustion.Transfat has demonstrated problems. Teflon? No, at least not if used as intended. Burning PTFE probably isn't a really good idea though.
Neither really, they were a by-product of partial hydrogenation, which was done to improve the presentation of the fats (turn oils into solids) and make the shelf life longer (unsaturated fats spoil more quickly than saturated fats because the allylic hydrogen is oxidized by air much more quickly). Using transition metal catalysts for the hydrogenation process isomerises most or all of the naturally occurring cis fats into the more thermodynamically stable trans form.What are advantages of trans fats? Do they taste better or are they cheaper?
For those who dont realize, it doesn't matter how hard you squeeze corn, you will never EVER get any oil out of it. Corn oil is a chemical product, nothing natural about it in any way, shape, or form.
/thinking out loud
Which begs the question:
The fact that things like transfats and teflon were approved for use in foods before we knew that they were monumantally bad for you, a growing course of events in the wide wide world of american processed / prepared foods.
Personally, I favor the FDA as a research and education department rather than having the ability to control commerce directly, but I'm sure I'm in a tiny minority there.
Americans are all about cheap. When things are cheap, you can buy more. We focus on quantity rather than quality and companies simply respond to the consumer's desires.
Next on the list. Corn syrup (dextrose). I hope.
So what happens when they go a step further and they say caffine is bad so you can no longer drink coffee or tea? What if they ban Sugar and ice cream? When exactly will this selective stop? Will they outlaw Alcohol too? Why not Sugar? Diabetes is killing millions of people.

 
				
		