FDA to ban trans fats

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ThinClient

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2013
3,977
4
0
Transfat has demonstrated problems. Teflon? No, at least not if used as intended. Burning PTFE probably isn't a really good idea though.

When teflon was originally introduced, it was approved for use in things like fry bags and hamburger wrappers and stuff in an effort to control the leaking of grease. Later, we discover that teflon can't be removed from the bloodstream and has significant health risks.

Sure, we continue to use teflon in applications that are intended not to mix with food products, but the damage is already done.
 

ThinClient

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2013
3,977
4
0
If we start banning everything that causes heart disease, beef won't be far behind.

Beef doesn't cause heart disease. People being fat fucks who eat a thousand pounds of food per meal cause heart disease.

Heart disease being the number one cause of death is a farce. Unless an autopsy is performed, a non-obvious cause of death is called "natural causes" (which is recorded as heart disease or cardiac failure) and it is the common practice to attribute death to heart disease. It's simply the catch-all column when "we don't know."
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
What about coconut oil? Is that considered trans fat? My wife bought some, and it looked opaque, so I told her if it's solid at room temperature, I am not eating it.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,768
20,341
146
What about coconut oil? Is that considered trans fat? My wife bought some, and it looked opaque, so I told her if it's solid at room temperature, I am not eating it.

Coconut oil is very high in saturated fat. Which is also a solid at room temperature, and is not exactly good for you either. It should be consumed in very limited quantities, even if you have no history or are not prone to cardiovascular disease.
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
These guys are a bunch of idiots. It's not up to them to ban trans fats but the market. Once again the FDA shows how useless it is.
 

BUnit1701

Senior member
May 1, 2013
853
1
0
i hate how they think they can pinpoint the number of heart attacks and deaths from trans fats.

theyre just doing this because someone lobbied for a replacement of transfats and the replacement will be no provably better for health than transfats.

Hold on to your hats ladies and gentlemen. This a a great story I like to call 'CSPI and your diet'. You see, back in 'the day', we used natural fats like beef tallow in our food. Even fast food, like McDonalds, the french fries were cooked in this wonderful tasting, perfectly healthy and safe oil. Then CSPI came along, and started raising holy hell that 'saturated fat' was a HUGE problem for us and we needed to get it all out of our food. The pressure mounted, and eventually all the major fast food chains dropped beef tallow and moved to hydrogenated vegetable oils (read : trans-fats). Now we have a huge problem with obesity and 'heart disease'. Of course, no one will be suggesting the common sense solution of going back to natural beef tallow and the sort, instead we need to find another artificial solution.

For those who dont realize, it doesn't matter how hard you squeeze corn, you will never EVER get any oil out of it. Corn oil is a chemical product, nothing natural about it in any way, shape, or form.
 

ThinClient

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2013
3,977
4
0
These guys are a bunch of idiots. It's not up to them to ban trans fats but the market. Once again the FDA shows how useless it is.

You clearly don't know what you're talking about. If it weren't for the FDA, you'd be swallowing Tylenol with strychnine.
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
These guys are a bunch of idiots. It's not up to them to ban trans fats but the market. Once again the FDA shows how useless it is.

If it's not in the jurisdiction of the "Food and Drug Administration" to regulate what constitutes "food," why bother having the FDA at all?
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
My first reaction was how dare they regulate a normal, tasty part of food!

Then I read the DT article... oh boy.

So it was developed as a part of the mass production / manufacturing process? Yuck. Might be tasty but !@#$ if it's not a natural part of food and it leads to heart disease...

Glad to be rid of it?

Anti PH forces did mount a very successful informational campaign. I have been aware of it for some time and ever since food manufacturers were required to put it on labels, I avoided it when at all possible. I can't control this type of fat in restaurant foods so I am glad to see FDA take action. With sugary soda... That is easy to avoid at a restaurant. PH not so much other than going to places that provide a little more info on how they cook their food.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,768
20,341
146
With Obamacare rolling in, the FDA will have a bigger role to play. Not sure how good that is or not, but that's the way it is.
 

ThinClient

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2013
3,977
4
0
The FDA shouldn't be involved with this. It should be up to the market and not them if trans fats are banned.

Yes. The market should decide whether cyanide and strychnine should be allowed in drugs. The FDA shouldn't step in to bother testing for things that are harmful to prevent companies from using them anyway.

:rolleyes:

I'm glad people like you aren't in charge.
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
The FDA shouldn't be involved with this. It should be up to the market and not them if trans fats are banned.

Why don't you think the FDA should be involved, given that they are the federal organization responsible for policing anything labeled as food in this country? It seems like exactly the sort of thing they should be involved with. It seems like their entire reason for existing (outside of the "and Drug" part of their name, I suppose).
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Yes. The market should decide whether cyanide and strychnine should be allowed in drugs. The FDA shouldn't step in to bother testing for things that are harmful to prevent companies from using them anyway.

:rolleyes:

I'm glad people like you aren't in charge.

Oh look. Another moron who puts words in my mouth because I dare disagree with him.