Originally posted by: vhx
Topic Title: FDA clears killing germs on lettuce/spinach.
Topic Summary: With radiation.
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: lozina
Logic dictates that if the irradiation procedure destroys e.coli/salmonella/other harmful bacteria it probably also destroys what's nutritious in some of these foods. So I think I'll pass on it.
Vitamins don't reproduce or metabolize. Neither does dead food. Radiation interferes with living things. Once it's dead, it's dead. No real worries here.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: lozina
Logic dictates that if the irradiation procedure destroys e.coli/salmonella/other harmful bacteria it probably also destroys what's nutritious in some of these foods. So I think I'll pass on it.
Vitamins don't reproduce or metabolize. Neither does dead food. Radiation interferes with living things. Once it's dead, it's dead. No real worries here.
I eat my vegetables while they are still alive and want to keep it that way.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I eat my vegetables while they are still alive and want to keep it that way.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Originally posted by: lozina
Logic dictates that if the irradiation procedure destroys e.coli/salmonella/other harmful bacteria it probably also destroys what's nutritious in some of these foods. So I think I'll pass on it.
Vitamins don't reproduce or metabolize. Neither does dead food. Radiation interferes with living things. Once it's dead, it's dead. No real worries here.
I eat my vegetables while they are still alive and want to keep it that way.
Originally posted by: lozina
Logic dictates that if the irradiation procedure destroys e.coli/salmonella/other harmful bacteria it probably also destroys what's nutritious in some of these foods. So I think I'll pass on it.
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
The sad part is they actually have to wait for the FDA to "ok" this.
Better than not having the FDA at all...although I am sure you'd disagree. :roll:
I'd prefer a much less corrupt organization do their job.
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Skoorb
... so it's best to leave it up to a government organization to deem it safe.
:laugh:
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Skoorb
... so it's best to leave it up to a government organization to deem it safe.
:laugh:
Its like you live in fantasy land. You dream of a time when the government stayed out of issues like this as if it was a better era. Do you have a clue?
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
The sad part is they actually have to wait for the FDA to "ok" this.
Better than not having the FDA at all...although I am sure you'd disagree. :roll:
I'd prefer a much less corrupt organization do their job.
You mean you'd prefer no organization at all. I'll take the supposed corrupt vs. none.
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Skoorb
... so it's best to leave it up to a government organization to deem it safe.
:laugh:
Its like you live in fantasy land. You dream of a time when the government stayed out of issues like this as if it was a better era. Do you have a clue?
Originally posted by: CitizenKain
Originally posted by: lozina
Logic dictates that if the irradiation procedure destroys e.coli/salmonella/other harmful bacteria it probably also destroys what's nutritious in some of these foods. So I think I'll pass on it.
Logic dictates that you are wrong about that.
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
How is it they are going to label irradiated food but not Cloned?
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
How is it they are going to label irradiated food but not Cloned?
What's cloning got to do with it. Plant cloning is a perfectly natural and normal way for plants to reproduce. Humans have been eating cloned plants since the beginning of the human race.
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Skoorb
... so it's best to leave it up to a government organization to deem it safe.
:laugh:
Its like you live in fantasy land. You dream of a time when the government stayed out of issues like this as if it was a better era. Do you have a clue?
Fantasy land? Pffft, the only parties in search of a utopia would be the Democrats and Republicans.
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
The sad part is they actually have to wait for the FDA to "ok" this.
Better than not having the FDA at all...although I am sure you'd disagree. :roll:
I'd prefer a much less corrupt organization do their job.
You mean you'd prefer no organization at all. I'll take the supposed corrupt vs. none.
Uh, no, that's not what I said. And "supposed" my ass, the FDA is full of corruption. Look into it.
I think you are missing his point. I think he means federal government oversight like that of the FDA. I agree, I would much rather have each state have their own organization or a private one. Competition is good IMO. The better the company or organization is that does the job, the more business (trust) they will get.
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Skoorb
... so it's best to leave it up to a government organization to deem it safe.
:laugh:
Its like you live in fantasy land. You dream of a time when the government stayed out of issues like this as if it was a better era. Do you have a clue?
Fantasy land? Pffft, the only parties in search of a utopia would be the Democrats and Republicans.
False. The libertarians are as well. They just believe in a different path.
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: bamacre
The sad part is they actually have to wait for the FDA to "ok" this.
Better than not having the FDA at all...although I am sure you'd disagree. :roll:
I'd prefer a much less corrupt organization do their job.
You mean you'd prefer no organization at all. I'll take the supposed corrupt vs. none.
Uh, no, that's not what I said. And "supposed" my ass, the FDA is full of corruption. Look into it.
I think you are missing his point. I think he means federal government oversight like that of the FDA. I agree, I would much rather have each state have their own organization or a private one. Competition is good IMO. The better the company or organization is that does the job, the more business (trust) they will get.
Sure, each state could do it. That might be better, but a private one? No. If oversight is what you're looking for, letting a private company do it doesn't make sense.
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
Radiation can destroy some of the Thiamin, Vitamin E, and Vitamin C in foods.