FBI Hate Crime Statistics

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

peonyu

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2003
2,038
23
81
Keep in mind that crime data is scewed -

1 - All Hispanics are counted as White when then they are considered as a possible Perp. So that inflates White numbers in the hate crime category AND in the overall crime rate for Whites.

2 - Hispanics are counted as Hispanic if one is a victim. So if a White guy attacks a Hispanic then its listed as a Hispanic victim of a possible hate crime. A hispanic can be a Victim but NEVER a perp as far as official crime records go [there is no listing for Hispanic under the Perp category at all].

3 - If a Hispanic attacks a White person out of racial bias [ie- hate crime] then its not listed as a possible hate but instead its listed as a White on White crime.

4 - Arabs, Asian-Indians, Jews and North Africans are also listed as Whites if they are the perps of a crime. But are "minorities" or "Muslim/Hindu/Jewish" if they are a victim of crime. This is because like Hispanics, official records have no box for Jews, Arabs, North Africans or Asian-Indians if they commited a crime so "White" is checked by default instead.

5 - Considering that, data that doesn't break down each group by itself [Jewish, Arab, Hispanic] as both a possible PERP and as Victim is bullshit data.
 
Last edited:

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lots of other type hate crimes in the USA, this recent Tulsa shooting being a prime example.

And not to in any way excuse some idiot spry painting swastikas, but that is far more survivable than being shot by bullets, or beating gays or Lesbians to death. Or need I mention, Federal grand standing by the ATF that led to Ruby Ridge and Waco Texas.

And gotta love the first Albatross link when the perp was a Jew.

Sadly, Xenophobia and violence is seeming ingrained in human nature.

Maybe and lucky for me, I live in an area of the USA where such incidents are rare. The formula is not difficult to figure out as we tend to live by the golden rule. As we treat others as we hope to be treated
 

RearAdmiral

Platinum Member
Jun 24, 2004
2,280
135
106
■0.6 percent were prompted by disability bias. (Based on Table 1.)

I sure showed that peg leg who was boss.
 

theevilsharpie

Platinum Member
Nov 2, 2009
2,322
14
81
Keep in mind that crime data is scewed -

1 - All Hispanics are counted as White when then they are considered as a possible Perp. So that inflates White numbers in the hate crime category AND in the overall crime rate for Whites.

2 - Hispanics are counted as Hispanic if one is a victim. So if a White guy attacks a Hispanic then its listed as a Hispanic victim of a possible hate crime. A hispanic can be a Victim but NEVER a perp as far as official crime records go [there is no listing for Hispanic under the Perp category at all].

3 - If a Hispanic attacks a White person out of racial bias [ie- hate crime] then its not listed as a possible hate but instead its listed as a White on White crime.

4 - Arabs, Asian-Indians, Jews and North Africans are also listed as Whites if they are the perps of a crime. But are "minorities" or "Muslim/Hindu/Jewish" if they are a victim of crime. This is because like Hispanics, official records have no box for Jews, Arabs, North Africans or Asian-Indians if they commited a crime so "White" is checked by default instead.

5 - Considering that, data that doesn't break down each group by itself [Jewish, Arab, Hispanic] as both a possible PERP and as Victim is bullshit data.

This. I don't know about the rest of the country, but here in So. Cal, racially/ethnically motivated hate crimes are far more likely to be Brown on Black (and vice versa) than anything else.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
I posted this a year or two ago. People on this forum repeatedly claim that only crimes committed by whites are classified as hate crimes, which isn't true. Blacks are only 11% of the population but commit 18% of hate crimes.
 

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
I'm curious to know how this is validated. As Throckmorton said, Blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime to their population . . how is not more of it of the "hate" variety, while ANY crime by a white against a black is considered a hate crime.
 

Yreka

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
4,084
0
76
■0.6 percent were prompted by disability bias. (Based on Table 1.)

I sure showed that peg leg who was boss.


This entire entry was caused by a handful of kids in Iowa who thought it was a good idea to go Drunken Wheelchair Tipping
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
I'm curious to know how this is validated. As Throckmorton said, Blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime to their population . . how is not more of it of the "hate" variety, while ANY crime by a white against a black is considered a hate crime.

To me that demonstrates the intrinsic goofiness about having "hate crimes." I would argue that the fact that a crime was motivated by someone's race or religion might justify a harsher sentence (the dragging death of James Byrd Jr., which was one of the crimes that led to the creation of federal hate crimes statutes, is a well-known example), but the arbitrary application of these laws makes me uncomfortable with creating an entire category of statutory "hate crimes."
 

CLite

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2005
1,726
7
76
I'm curious to know how this is validated. As Throckmorton said, Blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime to their population . . how is not more of it of the "hate" variety, while ANY crime by a white against a black is considered a hate crime.

You're talking out of your ass. Review the statistics, unless you think there was a grand total of 3,725 * 0.586 = 2183 white on black crimes committed to meet your "any crime by a white against a black is considered a hate crime". Overall less than half a percent of violent crimes are considered racially motivated hate crimes.
 

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
You're talking out of your ass. Review the statistics, unless you think there was a grand total of 3,725 * 0.586 = 2183 white on black crimes committed to meet your "any crime by a white against a black is considered a hate crime". Overall less than half a percent of violent crimes are considered racially motivated hate crimes.
I think more to his point would be that usually any (violent) white on black crime is investigated as a hate crime by default while black on white usually is not...there is a "reverse" racial bias that has been over correcting for a very long time, yes there was a time not too long ago that was terrible and went the opposite way, but by and large the US is WAY past that and we have since steered back to where the opposite is becoming more the norm
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
Since the very concept of a hate crime is bullshit, any data collected on the subject wouldnt be worth analyzing or interpreting.
 

woolfe9999

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2005
7,153
0
0
I think more to his point would be that usually any (violent) white on black crime is investigated as a hate crime by default while black on white usually is not...there is a "reverse" racial bias that has been over correcting for a very long time, yes there was a time not too long ago that was terrible and went the opposite way, but by and large the US is WAY past that and we have since steered back to where the opposite is becoming more the norm

It's possible there's some investigation bias, but only a small percentage are prosecuted as hate crimes. It's difficult to prove the bias motivation beyond reasonable doubt.
 

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
You're talking out of your ass. Review the statistics, unless you think there was a grand total of 3,725 * 0.586 = 2183 white on black crimes committed to meet your "any crime by a white against a black is considered a hate crime". Overall less than half a percent of violent crimes are considered racially motivated hate crimes.

I wonder why I hear so much about white>black hate-crimes on the news so much then . . .
 

Siddhartha

Lifer
Oct 17, 1999
12,505
3
81
You guys are really straining to use the FBI Hate Crime Statistics to support your "Blacks victimizing Whites" dogma. Which it does not.
 

CLite

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2005
1,726
7
76
I wonder why I hear so much about white>black hate-crimes on the news so much then . . .

Selective memory to fit your pre-conceived notions as to the extent of white on black hate-crimes.

Look at the FBI stats, do you think they are lying?
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
I don't know how useful it is to generalize from these stats in terms of which race is the biggest victim, which seems to be a topic of debate. For example, would that Baltimore beating be considered a hate crime? Perhaps not, but clearly race was a causal factor there.
 

cybrsage

Lifer
Nov 17, 2011
13,021
0
0
You guys are really straining to use the FBI Hate Crime Statistics to support your "Blacks victimizing Whites" dogma. Which it does not.

The statistics are meaningless. They support nothing. Well, untrue. They can be used to support someone who wants to show the stupidity of hate crime laws.
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
If there is a video tape of someone screaming ethnic slurs and beating someone to near death and they never catch that person I'm pretty sure they have a damn good idea that it was a hate crime even if they can't identify him.

That still wouldn't convince Rightists protecting their base.