FBI Hate Crime Statistics

[Siddhartha]

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/ucr

In response to dueling this race attacked that race threads, lets see what are the FBI Hate Crime statistics for 2010:

■In 2010, 1,949 law enforcement agencies reported 6,628 hate crime incidents involving 7,699 offenses.
■There were 6,624 single-bias incidents that involved 7,690 offenses, 8,199 victims, and 6,001 offenders.
■The 4 multiple-bias incidents reported in 2010 involved 9 offenses, 9 victims, and 7 offenders. (See Table 1 and Table 12.)
Single-bias incidents
An analysis of the 6,624 single-bias incidents reported in 2010 revealed the following:

■47.3 percent were racially motivated.
■20.0 percent were motivated by religious bias.
■19.3 percent resulted from sexual-orientation bias.
■12.8 percent stemmed from ethnicity/national origin bias.
■0.6 percent were prompted by disability bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Offenses by bias motivation within incidents
Of the 7,690 single-bias hate crime offenses reported in the above incidents:

■48.4 percent stemmed from racial bias.
■19.1 percent were motivated by sexual-orientation bias.
■18.3 percent resulted from religious bias.
■13.5 percent were prompted by ethnicity/national origin bias.
■0.6 percent resulted from biases against disabilities. (Based on Table 1.)
Racial bias
In 2010, law enforcement agencies reported that 3,725 single-bias hate crime offenses were racially motivated. Of these offenses:

■69.8 percent were motivated by anti-black bias.
■18.2 percent stemmed from anti-white bias.
■5.7 percent were a result of bias against groups of individuals consisting of more than one race (anti-multiple races, group).
■5.1 percent resulted from anti-Asian/Pacific Islander bias.
■1.2 percent were motivated by anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Religious bias
Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

■65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
■13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
■9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
■4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
■3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
■3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
■0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc. (Based on Table 1.)
Sexual-orientation bias
In 2010, law enforcement agencies reported 1,470 hate crime offenses based on sexual-orientation bias. Of these offenses:

■57.9 percent were classified as anti-male homosexual bias.
■27.4 percent were reported as anti-homosexual bias.
■11.4 percent were prompted by an anti-female homosexual bias.
■1.4 percent were the result of an anti-heterosexual bias.
■1.9 percent were classified as anti-bisexual bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Ethnicity/national origin bias
Of the single-bias incidents, 1,040 offenses were committed based on the perceived ethnicity or national origin of the victim. Of these offenses:

■65.5 percent were anti-Hispanic bias.
■34.5 percent were anti-other ethnicity/national origin bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Disability bias
There were 46 reported hate crime offenses committed based on disability bias. Of these:

■24 offenses were classified as anti-mental disability.
■22 offenses were reported as anti-physical disability. (See Table 1.)
By offense types
Of the 7,699 reported hate crime offenses in 2010:

■30.1 percent were destruction/damage/vandalism.
■29.0 percent were intimidation.
■21.8 percent were simple assault.
■11.5 percent were aggravated assault.
■7.5 percent were comprised of additional crimes against persons, property, and society. (Based on Table 2.)
Offenses by crime category
Among the 7,699 hate crime offenses reported:

■62.7 percent were crimes against persons.
■37.2 percent were crimes against property.
■The remainder were crimes against society. (Based on Table 2.) (See Data Collection in Methodology.)
Crimes against persons
Law enforcement reported 4,824 hate crime offenses as crimes against persons. By offense type:

■46.2 percent were intimidation.
■34.8 percent were simple assault.
■18.4 percent were aggravated assault.
■0.2 percent consisted of 7 murder and nonnegligent manslaughters and 4 forcible rapes.
■0.3 percent involved the offense category other, which is collected only in the National Incident-Based Reporting System. (Based on Table 2.)
Crimes against property
■The majority of the 2,861 hate crime offenses that were crimes against property—81.1 percent—were acts of destruction/damage/vandalism.
■The remaining 18.9 percent of crimes against property consisted of robbery, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, and other crimes. (Based on Table 2.)
Crimes against society
There were 14 offenses defined as crimes against society (e.g., drug or narcotic offenses or prostitution).

By victim type
When considering hate crime offenses by the type of victims reported:

■81.6 percent of reported offenses were directed at individuals.
■4.5 percent were against businesses or financial institutions.
■3.5 percent were against government.
■2.6 percent were against religious organizations.
■0.2 percent were against society.
■The remaining 7.6 percent were directed at other, multiple, or unknown victim types. (Based on Table 6.)

 

[cybrsage]

Interesting, but how would they know the attack upon a Jew was done because he was a Jew and not because he looked white? Same with the hispanic attacks, since the initial reports were that an obviously Hispanic male was actually white instead.

Just curious as to their methodology.

 

[Siddhartha]

Offenders
Download Printable Document


Law enforcement agencies reporting hate crime data to the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program identified 6,008 known offenders in 6,628 bias-motivated incidents in 2010. In the UCR Program, the term known offender does not imply that the suspect’s identity is known; rather, the term indicates that some aspect of the suspect was identified, thus distinguishing the suspect from an unknown offender. Law enforcement agencies specify the number of offenders and, when possible, the race of the offender or offenders as a group.

By race
In 2010, the races of the 6,008 known hate crime offenders were as follows:

■58.6 percent were white.
■18.4 percent were black.
■8.9 percent were groups made up of individuals of various races (multiple races, group).
■1.1 percent were Asian/Pacific Islander.
■1.0 percent were American Indian/Alaskan Native.
■12.0 percent were of unknown race.
(Based on Table 9.)

By crime category
Crimes against persons
A total of 4,873 known hate crime offenders committed crimes against persons in 2010. Of these offenders:

■40.5 percent committed simple assault.
■35.4 percent intimidated their victims.
■23.5 percent committed aggravated assault.
■0.3 percent murdered or raped their victims.
■0.3 percent committed other types of offenses, which are collected only in the UCR Program’s National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).
(Based on Table 2.)

Crimes against property
A total of 1,419 known hate crime offenders committed crimes against property in 2010. Of these offenders:

■58.6 percent committed destruction/damage/vandalism.
■20.4 percent committed robbery.
■9.9 percent committed larceny-theft.
■6.2 percent committed burglary.
■2.1 percent committed arson.
■0.6 percent committed motor vehicle theft.
■2.2 percent committed other types of offenses, which are collected only in the NIBRS.
(Based on Table 2.)

 

[Siddhartha]

Incidents and Offenses
Download Printable Document


The Uniform Crime Reporting Program collects data about both single-bias and multiple-bias hate crimes. For each offense type reported, law enforcement must indicate at least one bias motivation. A single-bias incident is defined as an incident in which one or more offense types are motivated by the same bias. A multiple-bias incident is defined as an incident in which more than one offense type occurs and at least two offense types are motivated by different biases.

■In 2010, 1,949 law enforcement agencies reported 6,628 hate crime incidents involving 7,699 offenses.
■There were 6,624 single-bias incidents that involved 7,690 offenses, 8,199 victims, and 6,001 offenders.
■The 4 multiple-bias incidents reported in 2010 involved 9 offenses, 9 victims, and 7 offenders. (See Table 1 and Table 12.)
Single-bias incidents
An analysis of the 6,624 single-bias incidents reported in 2010 revealed the following:

■47.3 percent were racially motivated.
■20.0 percent were motivated by religious bias.
■19.3 percent resulted from sexual-orientation bias.
■12.8 percent stemmed from ethnicity/national origin bias.
■0.6 percent were prompted by disability bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Offenses by bias motivation within incidents
Of the 7,690 single-bias hate crime offenses reported in the above incidents:

■48.4 percent stemmed from racial bias.
■19.1 percent were motivated by sexual-orientation bias.
■18.3 percent resulted from religious bias.
■13.5 percent were prompted by ethnicity/national origin bias.
■0.6 percent resulted from biases against disabilities. (Based on Table 1.)
Racial bias
In 2010, law enforcement agencies reported that 3,725 single-bias hate crime offenses were racially motivated. Of these offenses:

■69.8 percent were motivated by anti-black bias.
■18.2 percent stemmed from anti-white bias.
■5.7 percent were a result of bias against groups of individuals consisting of more than one race (anti-multiple races, group).
■5.1 percent resulted from anti-Asian/Pacific Islander bias.
■1.2 percent were motivated by anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Religious bias
Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

■65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
■13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
■9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
■4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
■3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
■3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
■0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc. (Based on Table 1.)
Sexual-orientation bias
In 2010, law enforcement agencies reported 1,470 hate crime offenses based on sexual-orientation bias. Of these offenses:

■57.9 percent were classified as anti-male homosexual bias.
■27.4 percent were reported as anti-homosexual bias.
■11.4 percent were prompted by an anti-female homosexual bias.
■1.4 percent were the result of an anti-heterosexual bias.
■1.9 percent were classified as anti-bisexual bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Ethnicity/national origin bias
Of the single-bias incidents, 1,040 offenses were committed based on the perceived ethnicity or national origin of the victim. Of these offenses:

■65.5 percent were anti-Hispanic bias.
■34.5 percent were anti-other ethnicity/national origin bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Disability bias
There were 46 reported hate crime offenses committed based on disability bias. Of these:

■24 offenses were classified as anti-mental disability.
■22 offenses were reported as anti-physical disability. (See Table 1.)
By offense types
Of the 7,699 reported hate crime offenses in 2010:

■30.1 percent were destruction/damage/vandalism.
■29.0 percent were intimidation.
■21.8 percent were simple assault.
■11.5 percent were aggravated assault.
■7.5 percent were comprised of additional crimes against persons, property, and society. (Based on Table 2.)
Offenses by crime category
Among the 7,699 hate crime offenses reported:

■62.7 percent were crimes against persons.
■37.2 percent were crimes against property.
■The remainder were crimes against society. (Based on Table 2.) (See Data Collection in Methodology.)
Crimes against persons
Law enforcement reported 4,824 hate crime offenses as crimes against persons. By offense type:

■46.2 percent were intimidation.
■34.8 percent were simple assault.
■18.4 percent were aggravated assault.
■0.2 percent consisted of 7 murder and nonnegligent manslaughters and 4 forcible rapes.
■0.3 percent involved the offense category other, which is collected only in the National Incident-Based Reporting System. (Based on Table 2.)
Crimes against property
■The majority of the 2,861 hate crime offenses that were crimes against property—81.1 percent—were acts of destruction/damage/vandalism.
■The remaining 18.9 percent of crimes against property consisted of robbery, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, and other crimes. (Based on Table 2.)
Crimes against society
There were 14 offenses defined as crimes against society (e.g., drug or narcotic offenses or prostitution).

By victim type
When considering hate crime offenses by the type of victims reported:

■81.6 percent of reported offenses were directed at individuals.
■4.5 percent were against businesses or financial institutions.
■3.5 percent were against government.
■2.6 percent were against religious organizations.
■0.2 percent were against society.
■The remaining 7.6 percent were directed at other, multiple, or unknown victim types. (Based on Table 6.)

 

[cybrsage]

Law enforcement agencies reporting hate crime data to the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program identified 6,008 known offenders in 6,628 bias-motivated incidents in 2010. In the UCR Program, the term known offender does not imply that the suspect’s identity is known;

So they are guessing it was a hate crime and actually have no idea whatsoever.

 

[CLite]

For relevance to this forums penchant for posting white/black black/white crimes let's consider the following:

In 2010 2600 anti-black offenses were classified as "hate crimes" and 678 anti-white offenses were classified as "hate crimes". In 2010 1,246,248 violent crimes were reported making the "hate crime" classification exceedingly rare, despite the hyperboles and rants some of this forums posters like to go on about race-baiting/"race card"/etc.

 

[CLite]

So they are guessing it was a hate crime and actually have no idea whatsoever.

If there is a video tape of someone screaming ethnic slurs and beating someone to near death and they never catch that person I'm pretty sure they have a damn good idea that it was a hate crime even if they can't identify him.

 

[Siddhartha]

According to the FBI for 2010, most of the race bias hate crimes were committed by whites at 58% and 69.8 percent were motivated by anti-black bias.

I guess you guys can cherry pick stories to prove your point about what race attacks whom but the FBI reports that whites are doing most of race base attacks.

 

[Anarchist420]

I can't believe the FBI wastes so much money on this shit. Anyway, I was surprised to see that it said there were more anti-black crimes than anti-white crimes. Then again, we have a President who self identifies as black so maybe I shouldn't be surprised.

 

[cybrsage]

If there is a video tape of someone screaming ethnic slurs and beating someone to near death and they never catch that person I'm pretty sure they have a damn good idea that it was a hate crime even if they can't identify him.

Their own statistics gathering method says they classified someone as white (for example) if there was a little bit of something showing they are white.

Obama could be classified as white by such a standard.

 

[cybrsage]

According to the FBI for 2010, most of the race bias hate crimes were committed by whites at 58% and 69.8 percent were motivated by anti-black bias.

Their methodology is either "we got info that says the person is white, though we do not really know who the person is" or still completely unknown.

Post the methodology used to list who was called white. Like I said, a Jew is attacked, is it because he is a Jew or a White? A majority are both. Does the Jew count twice, once as a white and once as a Jew? If a white man attacks a Jew, is it automatically a hate crime?

Need FAR more info than just "here are the hate crimes, do not bother to ask anything relevant about them".

 

[Siddhartha]

Statistics for 2007:

 

[Capt Caveman]

Their methodology is either "we got info that says the person is white, though we do not really know who the person is" or still completely unknown.

Post the methodology used to list who was called white. Like I said, a Jew is attacked, is it because he is a Jew or a White? A majority are both. Does the Jew count twice, once as a white and once as a Jew? If a white man attacks a Jew, is it automatically a hate crime?

Need FAR more info than just "here are the hate crimes, do not bother to ask anything relevant about them".

/facepalm

If they used your methodology, there would be a whole lot more incidents reported.

 

[CLite]

Their methodology is either "we got info that says the person is white, though we do not really know who the person is" or still completely unknown.

Post the methodology used to list who was called white. Like I said, a Jew is attacked, is it because he is a Jew or a White? A majority are both. Does the Jew count twice, once as a white and once as a Jew? If a white man attacks a Jew, is it automatically a hate crime?

Need FAR more info than just "here are the hate crimes, do not bother to ask anything relevant about them".

I think the overarching point should be despite the right's cries, "hate crimes" is very rarely ever used. Furthermore, if they are extending the classification to individuals they haven't even caught and processed that means it's used in the court of law even less frequently.

Pretty much stop being butt-hurt (not you specifically, but people who bitch about this in general) over something that's almost never used, and when it's used it's probably a decent reason considering it's rarity.

Discussing the 0.0001% influence of double counting jews as white seems pretty meaningless.

 

[Siddhartha]

Statistics for 2007: BEFORE MR OBAMA WAS ELECTED

Incidents and Offenses
Download Printable Document


The Uniform Crime Reporting Program collects data about both single-bias and multiple-bias hate crimes. For each offense type reported, law enforcement must indicate at least one bias motivation. A single-bias incident is defined as an incident in which one or more offense types are motivated by the same bias. A multiple-bias incident is defined as an incident in which more than one offense type occurs and at least two offense types are motivated by different biases.

■In 2007, 2,025 law enforcement agencies reported 7,624 hate crime incidents involving 9,006 offenses.
■There were 7,621 single-bias incidents that involved 8,999 offenses, 9,527 victims, and 6,962 offenders.
■The 3 multiple*-bias incidents reported in 2007 involved 7 offenses, 8 victims, and 3 known offenders. (See Tables 1 and 12.)
Single-bias incidents
An analysis of the 7,621 single-bias incidents reported in 2007 revealed the following:

■50.8 percent were racially motivated.
■18.4 percent were motivated by religious bias.
■16.6 percent resulted from sexual-orientation bias.
■13.2 percent stemmed from ethnicity/national origin bias.
■1.0 percent were prompted by disability bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Offenses by bias motivation within incidents
Of the 8,999 single-bias hate crime offenses reported in the above incidents:

■52.5 percent stemmed from racial bias.
■16.4 percent resulted from religious bias.
■16.2 percent were motivated by sexual-orientation bias.
■14.0 percent were prompted by ethnicity/national origin bias.
■0.9 percent resulted from biases against disabilities. (Based on Table 1.)
Racial bias
In 2007, law enforcement agencies reported that 4,724 single-bias hate crime offenses were racially motivated. Of these offenses:

■69.3 percent were motivated by anti-black bias.
■18.4 percent stemmed from anti-white bias.
■6.0 percent were a result of bias against groups of individuals consisting of more than one race (anti-multiple races, group).
■4.6 percent resulted from anti-Asian/Pacific Islander bias.
■1.6 percent were motivated by anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Religious bias
Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,477 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-biased offenses showed:

■68.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
■9.5 percent were anti-other religion.
■9.0 percent were anti-Islamic.
■4.4 percent were anti-Catholic.
■4.3 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
■4.0 percent were anti-Protestant.
■0.4 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc. (Based on Table 1.)
Sexual-orientation bias
In 2007, law enforcement agencies reported 1,460 hate crime offenses based on sexual-orientation bias. Of these offenses:

■59.2 percent were classified as anti-male homosexual bias.
■24.8 percent were reported as anti-homosexual bias.
■12.6 percent were prompted by an anti-female homosexual bias.
■1.8 percent were the result of an anti-heterosexual bias.
■1.6 percent were classified as anti-bisexual bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Ethnicity/national origin bias
Of the single-bias incidents, 1,256 offenses were committed based on the perceived ethnicity or national origin of the victim. Of these offenses:

■61.7 percent were anti-Hispanic bias.
■38.3 percent were anti-other ethnicity/national origin bias. (Based on Table 1.)
Disability bias
There were 82 reported hate crime offenses committed based on disability bias. Of these:

■62 offenses were classified as anti-mental disability.
■20 offenses were reported as anti-physical disability. (See Table 1.)
By offense types
Of the 9,006 reported hate crime offenses in 2007:

■32.4 percent were destruction/damage/vandalism.
■28.5 percent were intimidation.
■18.7 percent were simple assault.
■12.4 percent were aggravated assault.
■8.1 percent were comprised of additional crimes against persons, property, and society. (Based on Table 2.)
Offenses by crime category
Among the 9,006 hate crime offenses reported:

■60.0 percent were crimes against persons.
■39.7 percent were crimes against property.
■The remainder were crimes against society. (Based on Table 2.) (See Data Collection in Methodology.)
Crimes against persons
Law enforcement reported 5,408 hate crime offenses as crimes against persons. By offense type:

■47.4 percent were intimidation.
■31.1 percent were simple assault.
■20.6 percent were aggravated assault.
■0.2 percent consisted of 9 murders and 2 forcible rapes.
■0.6 percent involved the offense category other, which is collected only in the National Incident-Based Reporting System. (Based on Table 2.)
Crimes against property
■The majority of the 3,579 hate crime offenses that were crimes against property (81.4 percent) were acts of destruction/damage/vandalism.
■The remaining 18.6 percent of crimes against property consisted of robbery, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, and other crimes. (Based on Table 2.)
Crimes against society
Nineteen offenses were crimes against society (e.g., drug or narcotic offenses or prostitution).

By victim type
When considering the type of victims among property crimes:

■53.7 percent were directed at individuals.
■11.5 percent were against businesses or financial institutions.
■7.4 percent were against government.
■6.8 percent were against religious organizations.
■The remaining 20.6 percent were directed at other, multiple, or unknown victim types. (Based on Table 6.)

 

[cybrsage]

I am simply questioning their methodology, as the OP does not think it is important at all to the results provided...which is silly.

Personally, I think all crimes should be treated equally. If the punishment is not severe enough for a crime, the punishment needs to be increased for that crime, not a new type of crime created for the exact same act.

But it is good to see it is almost only ever used to give whites more time in jail.

 

[Siddhartha]

2007 Hate Crime Statistics: BEFORE MR OBAMA WAS ELECTED

Victims
Download Printable Document


In the Uniform Crime Reporting Program, the victim of a hate crime may be an individual, a business, an institution, or society as a whole. In 2007, the Nation’s law enforcement agencies reported that there were 9,535 victims of hate crimes. Of these victims, 8 were victimized in 3 separate multiple-bias incidents.

By bias motivation
An analysis of data for victims of single-bias hate crime incidents showed that:

■52.0 percent of the victims were targeted because of the offender’s bias against a race.
■17.1 percent were victimized because of a bias against a religious belief.
■15.9 percent were targeted because of a bias against a particular sexual orientation.
■14.1 percent were victimized because of a bias against an ethnicity/national origin.
■0.9 percent were targeted because of a bias against a disability.
(Based on Table 1.)

Racial bias
Among the single-bias hate crime incidents in 2007, there were 4,956 victims of racially motivated hate crime.

■69.3 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-black bias.
■18.3 percent were victims of an anti-white bias.
■4.7 percent were victims of an anti-Asian/Pacific Islander bias.
■1.5 percent were victims of an anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native bias.
■6.1 percent were victims of a bias against a group of individuals in which more than one race was represented (anti-multiple races, group).
(Based on Table 1.)

Religious bias
Of the 1,628 victims of an anti-religious hate crime:

■69.2 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-Jewish bias.
■8.7 percent were victims of an anti-Islamic bias.
■4.3 percent were victims of an anti-Catholic bias.
■4.1 percent were victims of an anti-Protestant bias.
■0.5 percent were victims of an anti-Atheist/Agnostic bias.
■9.1 percent were victims of a bias against other religions (anti-other religion).
■4.1 percent were victims of a bias against groups of individuals of varying religions (anti-multiple religions, group).
(Based on Table 1.)

Sexual-orientation bias
Of the 1,512 victims targeted due to a sexual-orientation bias:

■58.9 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-male homosexual bias.
■24.8 percent were victims of an anti-homosexual bias.
■13.0 percent were victims of an anti-female homosexual bias.
■1.8 percent were victims of an anti-heterosexual bias.
■1.5 percent were victims of an anti-bisexual bias.
(Based on Table 1.)

Ethnicity/national origin bias
Hate crimes motivated by the offender’s bias toward a particular ethnicity/national origin were directed at 1,347 victims. Of these victims:

■61.6 percent were targeted because of an anti-Hispanic bias.
■38.4 percent were victimized because of a bias against other ethnicities/national origins.
(Based on Table 1.)

Disability bias
Of the 84 victims of a hate crime due to the offender’s bias against a disability:

■64 were targets of an anti-mental disability bias.
■20 were victims of an anti-physical disability bias.
(See Table 1.)

By crime category
Of the 9,535 victims of a hate crime, 56.7 percent were victims of crimes against persons, and 43.1 percent were victims of crimes against property. The remaining percentage were victims of crimes against society. (Based on Table 2.)

By offense type
Crimes against persons
In 2007, 5,408 victims of hate crimes were victims of crimes against persons. Regarding these victims and the crimes committed against them:

■9 persons were murdered, and 2 were forcibly raped.
■47.4 percent of the victims were intimidated.
■31.1 percent were victims of simple assault.
■20.6 percent were victims of aggravated assault.
■Less than one percent (0.6) were victims of other types of offenses, which are collected only in the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).
(Based on Table 2.)

Crimes against property
In 2007, 4,108 victims of hate crimes were victims of crimes against property. Of these:

■81.0 percent were victims of destruction/damage/vandalism.
■5.7 percent were victims of robbery.
■5.6 percent were victims of larceny-theft.
■4.7 percent were victims of burglary.
■1.1 percent were victims of arson.
■0.7 percent were victims of motor vehicle theft.
■1.1 percent were victims of other types of hate crime offenses, which are collected only in the NIBRS.
(Based on Table 2.)

Crimes against society
Nineteen victims of hate crimes were victims of crimes against society. (See Table 2.)

 

[cybrsage]

Still more worthless info posted by Sidd

 

[Siddhartha]

2007 FBI Hate Crime Statistics: BEFORE MR OBAMA WAS ELECTED

Offenders
Download Printable Document


Law enforcement agencies reporting hate crime data to the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program identified 6,965 known offenders in 7,624 bias-motivated incidents in 2007. In the UCR Program, the term known offender does not imply that the suspect’s identity is known; rather, the term indicates that some aspect of the suspect was identified, thus distinguishing the suspect from an unknown offender. Law enforcement agencies specify the number of offenders and, when possible, the race of the offender or offenders as a group.

By race
In 2007, the races of the 6,965 known hate crime offenders were as follows:

■62.9 percent were white.
■20.8 percent were black.
■4.9 percent were groups made up of individuals of various races (multiple races, group).
■1.0 percent were American Indian/Alaskan Native.
■0.7 percent were Asian/Pacific Islander.
■9.8 percent were unknown.
(Based on Table 9.)

By crime category
Crimes against persons
A total of 5,542 known hate crime offenders committed crimes against persons in 2007. Of these offenders:
37.0 percent committed simple assault.

■36.6 percent intimidated their victims.
■25.4 percent committed aggravated assault.
■0.3 percent murdered or raped their victims.
■0.7 percent committed other types of offenses, which are collected only in the UCR Program’s National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). (Based on Table 2.)
Crimes against property
A total of 1,826 known hate crime offenders committed crimes against property in 2007. Of these offenders:

■60.7 percent committed destruction/damage/vandalism.
■21.5 percent committed robbery.
■7.1 percent committed burglary.
■6.9 percent committed larceny-theft.
■1.8 percent committed arson.
■0.2 percent committed motor vehicle theft.
■1.8 percent committed other types of offenses, which are collected only in the NIBRS. (Based on Table 2.)
Crimes against society
In 2007, 25 known offenders committed 19 crimes against society involving 19 victims. Crimes against society are collected only via the NIBRS. (See Table 2.)

 

[Londo_Jowo]

According to the FBI for 2010, most of the race bias hate crimes were committed by whites at 58% and 69.8 percent were motivated by anti-black bias.

I guess you guys can cherry pick stories to prove your point about what race attacks whom but the FBI reports that whites are doing most of race base attacks.

How many crimes are white on black or black on white that aren't reported as a hate crime?

 

[Siddhartha]

Still more worthless info posted by Sidd

Worthless? Because the actual data does not support what you believe?

Please provide data from an impartial source to proves the FBI is wrong.

 

[CLite]

But it is good to see it is almost only ever used to give whites more time in jail.

It would take extreme arrogance or an un-willingness to admit past errors if you think "hate crimes" is just used to extend sentences as an anti-white mechanism. Clearly something that's used 0.001% of the time isn't just thrown around to extend sentences. I'm pretty sure there were a couple thousand crimes of people being driven by racial hatred.

At a point in our history beating someone up did not carry enough repercussions to reflect it's effect on the domination and attempt to control an entire race of people. In the late 1960's voter intimidation and suppression were carried out with physical violence. Duly elected representatives determined the punishment for such behavior had to be more than what would be passed down in a bar fight.

I understand we could debate the requirement for such a classification in the modern era but to think it's just to "give whites more jail time" is fucking ludicrous and belittles a struggle during a very reprehensible time period in American history.

 

[Siddhartha]

Methodology
Download Printable Document


The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program collects data regarding criminal offenses that are motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender’s bias against a race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity/national origin, or disability and are committed against persons, property, or society. Because motivation is subjective, it is sometimes difficult to know with certainty whether a crime resulted from the offender’s bias. Moreover, the presence of bias alone does not necessarily mean that a crime can be considered a hate crime. Only when law enforcement investigation reveals sufficient evidence to lead a reasonable and prudent person to conclude that the offender’s actions were motivated, in whole or in part, by his or her bias, should an incident be reported as a hate crime.

Data collection
Incident types
The UCR Program collects data about both single-bias and multiple-bias hate crimes. A single-bias incident is defined as an incident in which one or more offense types are motivated by the same bias. A multiple-bias incident is defined as an incident in which more than one offense type occurs and at least two offense types are motivated by different biases.

Offense types
The law enforcement agencies that voluntarily participate in the Hate Crime program collect details about an offender’s bias motivation associated with 11 offense types already being reported to the UCR Program: murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, aggravated assault, simple assault, and intimidation (crimes against persons); and robbery, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, and destruction/damage/vandalism (crimes against property). The law enforcement agencies that participate in the UCR Program via the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) collect data about additional offenses for crimes against persons and crimes against property. These data appear in Hate Crime Statistics in the category of other. These agencies also collect hate crime data for the category called crimes against society, which includes drug or narcotic offenses, gambling offenses, prostitution offenses, and weapon law violations. Together, the offense classification other and the crime category crimes against society include 35 Group A Offenses (not listed) that are captured in the NIBRS, which also collects the previously mentioned 11 offense categories. (The Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, NIBRS Edition [1992], provides an explanation of the 46 Group A Offenses. )

Crimes against persons, property, or society
The UCR Program’s data collection guidelines stipulate that a hate crime may involve multiple offenses, victims, and offenders within one incident; therefore, the hate crime data collection program is incident-based. According to UCR counting guidelines:

■One offense is counted for each victim in crimes against persons.
■One offense is counted for each offense type in crimes against property.
■One offense is counted for each offense type in crimes against society.
Victims
In the UCR Program, the victim of a hate crime may be an individual, a business, an institution, or society as a whole.

Offenders
According to the UCR Program, the term known offender does not imply that the suspect’s identity is known; rather, the term indicates that some aspect of the suspect was identified, thus distinguishing the suspect from an unknown offender. Law enforcement agencies specify the number of offenders and, when possible, the race of the offender or offenders as a group.

Race/ethnicity
The UCR Program uses the following five racial designations in its hate crime data collection program: White; Black; American Indian/Alaskan Native; Asian/Pacific Islander; and Multiple Races, Group. In addition, the UCR Program uses the ethnic designations of Hispanic and Other Ethnicity/National Origin.

Data reporting
Law enforcement agencies report hate crimes brought to their attention monthly or quarterly to the FBI either directly or through their state UCR Programs. These agencies submit hate crime data in either a NIBRS submission or an electronic hate crime record layout via e-mail. Agencies may also submit hate crime data on printed forms entitled the Hate Crime Incident Report and the Quarterly Hate Crime Report.

Reporting via the NIBRS
Agencies that report offense data to the FBI via the NIBRS use a data element within their reporting software to indicate whether an incident was motivated by bias. Because the NIBRS is an incident-based, comprehensive data collection system, these agencies can report considerably more information about a hate crime than that captured on the paper forms or in the current electronic record. For example, the data element that indicates bias motivation applies to all 46 Group A Offenses, and agencies can report information such as the age, sex, and race of victims, offenders, and arrestees. Though the additional data collected via the NIBRS are not maintained in the hate crime database, they are available in the NIBRS master files. When agencies submit a Group B Arrest Report (because no offenses [bias-motivated or otherwise] occurred in their respective jurisdictions) or a Zero Report (because no offenses [bias-motivated or otherwise] or arrests occurred), the FBI records zero hate crime incidents for that agency for the reporting period.

Reporting via the electronic hate crime record layout
Law enforcement agencies that prefer electronic submissions but do not report via the NIBRS may use the hate crime record layout specified in the publication Hate Crime Magnetic Media Specifications for Tapes & Diskettes (January 1997 [with subsequent amendments]).

Reporting via printed forms
Agencies that use the Hate Crime Incident Report and the Quarterly Hate Crime Report forms capture the following information about each hate crime incident:

■Offense type and the respective bias motivation
■Number and type of victims
■Location of the incident
■Number of known offenders
■Race of known offenders
For each calendar quarter, law enforcement agencies submit a Hate Crime Incident Report for each bias-motivated incident as well as a Quarterly Hate Crime Report, which summarizes the total number of incidents reported for the quarter. Agencies may also use the Quarterly Hate Crime Report to delete any previously reported incidents that were determined through subsequent investigation not to be bias-motivated. If no hate crime incidents occurred in their jurisdictions that quarter, the agencies must still submit the Quarterly Hate Crime Report to report zero hate crime incidents.

Population figures and area designations
Estimates
For the 2007 population estimates used in this report, the FBI computed individual rates of growth from one year to the next for every city/town and county using 2000 decennial population counts and 2001 through 2006 population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau. Each agency’s rates of growth were averaged; that average was then applied and added to its 2006 Census population estimate to derive the agency’s 2007 population estimate.

Universities and colleges
The figures listed for universities and colleges are student enrollments that were provided by the United States Department of Education for the 2006 school year, the most recent available. The enrollment figures include full-time and part-time students.

County designations
Based on the Office of Management and Budget’s standards for defining Metropolitan Statistical Areas, the UCR Program refers to suburban counties as metropolitan counties and to rural counties as nonmetropolitan counties.

Caution to users
Valid assessments about crime, including hate crime, are possible only with careful study and analysis of the various conditions affecting each local law enforcement jurisdiction. (See Variables Affecting Crime.) In addition, some data in this publication may not be comparable to those in prior editions of Hate Crime Statistics because of differing levels of participation from year to year. Therefore, the reader is cautioned against making simplistic comparisons between the statistical data of this program and that of others with differing methodologies or even comparing individual reporting units solely on the basis of their agency type.

Table methodology
To be included in this publication, law enforcement agencies must have submitted either of the following: 1) at least one Hate Crime Incident Report and/or a Quarterly Hate Crime Report or
2) at least one NIBRS Group A Incident Report, a Group B Arrest Report, or a Zero Report for at least 1 month of the calendar year. The published data, therefore, do not necessarily represent reports from each participating agency for 12 subsequent months or 4 quarters.
When examining the data contained in this report, data users should be aware that the first line following each table number presents that table’s unit of analysis: incident, offense, victim, or known offender. The tabular presentation that follows briefly describes the data sources and the methods used to construct Tables 1–14.

 

[Albatross]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EL67ajELJw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6RjVZwcw24

Lots of anti-semitism in the US.

 

[Lemon law]

In MHO two things are true.

1. Classifying a given criminal case as a hate crime or not a hate crime will always be subjective.

2. Since most hate crimes classifications are Federal crimes, and ordinary crimes are usually State prosecuted, its becomes a matter of if a given crime will be prosecuted by a State or Federal Prosecutor.

Given the fact that there are far more crimes committed than there are funded prosecutors on the State and Federal level, usually means most crimes will be plea bargained down. Except for high public profile crimes that allow defense attorneys endless opportunities for delay.