sixone
Lifer
- May 3, 2004
- 25,030
- 5
- 61
again blood alcohol test can only proof that you were driving above the legal limit not that you are drunk.
Visual observation like bloodshot eyes not stable on their feet is little rhyme arresting officers learned to describe a drunk person. Until they came out with the baby defense.
No I am not drunk. Been investigating driving under the influence cases for almost 10 years now. I can tell you the precise procedure onward must follow if one gets arrested. You only have 4 hours to get him to a doctor.
And yet, you can't spell the word "prove". I take leave to doubt your claims.
The evidence shows that the cars driver was DRUNK - legally and factually. http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Alvin-dad-accused-of-driver-s-revenge-killing-4269065.php
Tests showed Banda's blood alcohol was twice the legal limit when his Chevrolet Malibu rear-ended the Barajas' family's Ford 250 truck that had run out of gas on an unlit county road near Alvin, investigators said. The inebriated driver failed to swerve or even apply his brakes before plowing into the truck and crushing Barajas' sons, David Jr., 12, and Caleb, 11.