Outersqaure said:
"Poor examples since you are talking about extremes of both ends. Besides in reality, CHP almost never send people to jail for driving 100+. They just write you a bigger ticket. Law enforcement almost always regards drug possession and use as a far more serious violation than speeding. Ask any police officer yourself. You pretty much answered your own question, it's a question of severity."
We need to put this all in perspective now. This thread seems to be comprised mostly of people who have stated they have driven over 100mph. The SIG file that the Moderator of this formum decided to comment on belonged to Stonythug - who simply proclaimed positivity towards marijuana. No where did he say that he was smoking 10pounds of it at a time or that he had a greenhouse in his house full of hydroponic units or that he was dealing it or that he had killed anyone while using it, transporting it or that he was above the law. Therefore, he was not in the extreme - yet was warned that he may be banned.
Yet everyone who has gone above their state's posted speed limit has admitted guilt of speeding - a very illegal act, moreso than proclaiming their affection for illicit substances.
I think the mods should lock all threads involving minors stating anything to do with alcohol or smoking since minors using either is illegal.
What it comes down to is the inconsistency of logic and reason of the moderator of this particular forum. If we are going to allow banter concerning such illegal acts as infringing upon copyrighted material (ie: Napster, Gnutella, Freenet and the like), then the moderator must allow for other questionably legal things such as discussion of illegal drugs. I know this is not High Time Forum, but they seem to block links to warez sites. Is Napster more accepted because more people use it?
I find it highly unfortunate that the moderator of this forum lacks the logic and intelligence to be consistent and fair in their perspective and especially, their actions.
What it boils down to is this: if you are going to let someone talk about one illegal thing freely, then they should allow someone else to talk another illegal thing freely. But, I susptect that their personal perspective may have gotten in the way when they went around using their power. If they were simply enforcing the rules of this forum, then the rules of this forum are illogical and must be rethought to be more consistent.
How much more amatuer can you get?