• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Farcry 2 results: GF100 Vs. GTX285

T

Tempered81

Diamond Member
Not sure if its a 448 shader (gtx360) Fermi, or a 512 shader (gtx380) Fermi. However, rumour going around is that it's the 448 shader version, and it's coming in at ~ 1.68 times faster than a gtx285. Puts whichever part (360 or 380) being tested directly between the performance of a hd5870 & hd5970.

GTX285: 51 FPS
GF100 part: 84 FPS

Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-0iFBiLw_k&feature=player_embedded

copyofruko.png


ruko.png


28rgwwm.png


Check out some other interesting (non-rocketsled) vids showcasing GF100 in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcXmV5Je_gc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Juxq2tqHyI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ie0t_LkImk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLu8DyzoVMs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFgzG9WyGNQ
 
Last edited:
Hmm, I'll stand by my previous crystal ball prediction

GTX360 ~= 5870
5870 < GTX380 < 5970


just like last gen
 
soccerballtux said:
there's no way they would do that. or can do it, for that matter.
Click to expand...
Why not? I don't remember the exact figures but isn't GF100 like 50&#37; bigger than Cypress? Same goes for the TDP. Depending on benchmarks and configurations, it'd be strange if there isn't a case where GF100 lives up to its size and power consumption.

NDA be damned. Nice leak!
 
lopri said:
Why not? I don't remember the exact figures but isn't GF100 like 50% bigger than Cypress? Same goes for the TDP. Depending on benchmarks and configurations, it'd be strange if there isn't a case where GF100 lives up to its size and power consumption.

NDA be damned. Nice leak!
Click to expand...

I'd just be highly surprised if one card were actually 50% faster than another same generation card.
 
In a perfect scaling world

360 vs 380

(512-448)/448 = 14&#37;

so a 512 would avg 96fps so

(96-71)/71 = 35 % Ironically equal to the number floating around CES.
 
Count me among those expecting the 380 to be 20&#37; or so faster than the 5870 on average.

Nevertheless, this is great news on the green front. If we have more leaks like this maybe the buying frenzy for the ATI 5 series would subside. With prices returning to MSRP (and dare I hope for, below MSRP) levels.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top