Outside of people being upset by Schumer's both sides bullshit, who in the left in this thread is calling for an end of civil discourse? The vast majority are bitching about how the president and majority party have ended any even feigning of civil discourse.
The fucking president of the United States is blaming the media for upsetting his fans to the point of bombing people and a huge chunk of Republicans are so mind warped they think it was a false flag attack with no evidence. But yeah, blame the Democrats for being upset that Schumer pulled a classic Trump both sides.
What's sad is these bombs will likely energize the Republican base and Trump's dick sucks were still all doing their idiotic chants last night. But yeah, you're right, it's the left that wants to end civility.
That's your reply to me being disappointed in the posts I've read here?
Haha... Yeah, as if I painted "the left" with "ending civility". You got anymore bullshit to sell us?
You have anymore straw men you need to tear down? Go ahead, I'll wait until you dial it back down to reality.
As for my comments, Schumer's initial statement was 100% correct. Calling for national unity against violence is the only answer for violence. The other potential action(s) would just be divisive, polarizing, and escalate, potentially leading towards further violence. If you have a specific beef with what Schumer said, then I'd love to hear that explained.
His quote:
Make no mistake: Despicable acts of violence and harassment are being carried out by radicals across the political spectrum—not just by one side. Regardless of who is responsible, these acts are wrong and must be condemned by Democrats and Republicans alike. Period.
There is nothing wrong in standing by those words.