Homerboy
Lifer
- Mar 1, 2000
- 30,640
- 4,733
- 126
With just your IP address you have SOME plausible deniability - "my little brother did it" or "oops, I didn't realize I was sharing my wireless router with the entire neighborhood..." With a credit card, you'd have a hard time denying it. Yeah, they don't keep logs... but it's not outside the realm of possibility that the FBI could raid them and keep it quiet for a few days while monitoring the traffic.Originally posted by: Skoorb
Not really, beacuse you can be tracked unequivocally with your IP anyway, so who cares if they happened to use your CC number. In any case, many usenet providers do not keep logs, and specifically state as much, so then all somebody sees is that you're a subscriber to a usenet server--and they all have a lot of legal content, as well.
Actually as long as you are simply leeching and not providing (you do both with BT) then you are much MUCH less of a target. They are more concerned with those uploading, whether it be to 0sec FTPs or 2k/sec over BT than somebody pulling down 600KB/sec off their paid NG server.In reality though, I don't think either is really a danger to the user/downloader, as they've mostly been going after the large-scale facilitators.
Hehehehehe never heard of the Patriot Act eh?Originally posted by: Reck
The FBI cannot just log your usenet downloads, that'd be an illegal wiretap.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Hehehehehe never heard of the Patriot Act eh?Originally posted by: Reck
The FBI cannot just log your usenet downloads, that'd be an illegal wiretap.
All Routers now have backdoor built-in just for the FBI.
You doubt the backdoor???Originally posted by: Reck
ummm why do i really doubt that? besides if it was found out that the patriot act was used as a means of gathering evidence, the case would be thrown out of the court I think.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Hehehehehe never heard of the Patriot Act eh?Originally posted by: Reck
The FBI cannot just log your usenet downloads, that'd be an illegal wiretap.
All Routers now have backdoor built-in just for the FBI.
they just dont know is what is is, i download more then most people useing BT, however none of it is illegel (yet), i average around 8 gigs a day, and they are all from public trackers because i dont know of a single privite one that has anything i want to DLOriginally posted by: CorporateRecreation
This is what happens when you use public trackers.. are people really that stupid/naive?
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
You doubt the backdoor???Originally posted by: Reck
ummm why do i really doubt that? besides if it was found out that the patriot act was used as a means of gathering evidence, the case would be thrown out of the court I think.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Hehehehehe never heard of the Patriot Act eh?Originally posted by: Reck
The FBI cannot just log your usenet downloads, that'd be an illegal wiretap.
All Routers now have backdoor built-in just for the FBI.
Show me one Patriot Act case thrown out.
MUAHAHLet's see some documentation or fact about this 'back door' other than what's under your tin foil hat.
I have heard that the constitutionality of the Patriot Act has come into question and the government was avoiding using evidence acquired by the Patriot Act because it would all for the courts to challenge it. So thus far there has been no prosecution by evidence of the Patriot Act.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
You doubt the backdoor???Originally posted by: Reck
ummm why do i really doubt that? besides if it was found out that the patriot act was used as a means of gathering evidence, the case would be thrown out of the court I think.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Hehehehehe never heard of the Patriot Act eh?Originally posted by: Reck
The FBI cannot just log your usenet downloads, that'd be an illegal wiretap.
All Routers now have backdoor built-in just for the FBI.
Show me one Patriot Act case thrown out.
Shhh, you're ruining my funOriginally posted by: Homerboy
MUAHAHLet's see some documentation or fact about this 'back door' other than what's under your tin foil hat.
I like the "EVERY ROUTER" quote too.
Last I checked with my buddies who run international networks none of them even know of this "back door"
FBI's requests for router monitoring accessOriginally posted by: CorporateRecreation
Let's see some documentation or fact about this 'back door' other than what's under your tin foil hat.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
You doubt the backdoor???Originally posted by: Reck
ummm why do i really doubt that? besides if it was found out that the patriot act was used as a means of gathering evidence, the case would be thrown out of the court I think.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Hehehehehe never heard of the Patriot Act eh?Originally posted by: Reck
The FBI cannot just log your usenet downloads, that'd be an illegal wiretap.
All Routers now have backdoor built-in just for the FBI.
Show me one Patriot Act case thrown out.
I want to see a credible site. dslreports is hardly a .gov site with legitimate information on the subject.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
FBI's requests for router monitoring accessOriginally posted by: CorporateRecreation
Let's see some documentation or fact about this 'back door' other than what's under your tin foil hat.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
You doubt the backdoor???Originally posted by: Reck
ummm why do i really doubt that? besides if it was found out that the patriot act was used as a means of gathering evidence, the case would be thrown out of the court I think.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Hehehehehe never heard of the Patriot Act eh?Originally posted by: Reck
The FBI cannot just log your usenet downloads, that'd be an illegal wiretap.
All Routers now have backdoor built-in just for the FBI.
Show me one Patriot Act case thrown out.
It pains me to do this, but McOwen is right for once. As phone companies move to packet switching networks, the government has asked telecom manufacturers that they provide wiretap-equivalent capabilities for the next generation of routers in order to maintain the ability for lawful access.Originally posted by: Nik
I want to see a credible site. dslreports is hardly a .gov site with legitimate information on the subject.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
FBI's requests for router monitoring accessOriginally posted by: CorporateRecreation
Let's see some documentation or fact about this 'back door' other than what's under your tin foil hat.
In America computer downloads you!Originally posted by: yllus
It pains me to do this, but McOwen is right for once. As phone companies move to packet switching networks, the government has asked telecom manufacturers that they provide wiretap-equivalent capabilities for the next generation of routers in order to maintain the ability for lawful access.Originally posted by: Nik
I want to see a credible site. dslreports is hardly a .gov site with legitimate information on the subject.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
FBI's requests for router monitoring accessOriginally posted by: CorporateRecreation
Let's see some documentation or fact about this 'back door' other than what's under your tin foil hat.
Canada is in the process of enacting an even worse law, if it's any consolation.Originally posted by: virtueixi
In America computer downloads you!
Edit: Whoa, I just realized you guys are talking about home routers! Of course those won't be affected by this law, that's just moronic. This is big backend routers only. How stupid do you have to be to think home routers will get backdoors built in? Some 15 year old hacker would crack the access in 10 minutes and run buckwild.Section 103 of CALEA sets forth the assistance capability requirements that telecommunications carriers need to maintain to support law enforcement in the conduct of lawfully-authorized electronic surveillance. Specifically, CALEA directs the telecommunications industry to design, develop, and deploy solutions that meet certain assistance capability requirements.
Pursuant to a court order or other lawful authorization, carriers must be able to: (1) expeditiously isolate all wire and electronic communications of a target transmitted by the carrier within its service area; (2) expeditiously isolate call-identifying information of a target; (3) provide intercepted communications and call-identifying information to law enforcement; and (4) carry out intercepts unobtrusively, so targets are not made aware of the electronic surveillance, and in a manner that does not compromise the privacy and security of other communications.
Originally posted by: yllus
Canada is in the process of enacting an even worse law, if it's any consolation.Originally posted by: virtueixi
In America computer downloads you!
The U.S. Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act - Implementation:
Edit: Whoa, I just realized you guys are talking about home routers! Of course those won't be affected by this law, that's just moronic. This is big backend routers only. How stupid do you have to be to think home routers will get backdoors built in? Some 15 year old hacker would crack the access in 10 minutes and run buckwild.Section 103 of CALEA sets forth the assistance capability requirements that telecommunications carriers need to maintain to support law enforcement in the conduct of lawfully-authorized electronic surveillance. Specifically, CALEA directs the telecommunications industry to design, develop, and deploy solutions that meet certain assistance capability requirements.
Pursuant to a court order or other lawful authorization, carriers must be able to: (1) expeditiously isolate all wire and electronic communications of a target transmitted by the carrier within its service area; (2) expeditiously isolate call-identifying information of a target; (3) provide intercepted communications and call-identifying information to law enforcement; and (4) carry out intercepts unobtrusively, so targets are not made aware of the electronic surveillance, and in a manner that does not compromise the privacy and security of other communications.