Eagles vs. Vikings

[Nitemare]

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: Nitemare
A challenge. He clearly was not out of bounds when he first touched the ball, but only had one foot down in bounds. Anyone know the rules on this?

Bullsh_t!!!

He had a foot and his fingers clearly touched the ground before touching the ball. Refs officially suck

When you go out of bounds, you need to re-establish yourself on the field of play before making a play. He clearly did not get his other foot inbounds (this is what they mean by re-establishing), so the ruling on the field was overturned.

2 points of reference. not necessarily feet. I rest my case, all officials suck

 

[BigJ]

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: Nitemare
A challenge. He clearly was not out of bounds when he first touched the ball, but only had one foot down in bounds. Anyone know the rules on this?

Bullsh_t!!!

He had a foot and his fingers clearly touched the ground before touching the ball. Refs officially suck

When you go out of bounds, you need to re-establish yourself on the field of play before making a play. He clearly did not get his other foot inbounds (this is what they mean by re-establishing), so the ruling on the field was overturned.

2 points of reference. not necessarily feet. I rest my case, all officials suck

Got a link?

 

[spidey07]

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: Nitemare
A challenge. He clearly was not out of bounds when he first touched the ball, but only had one foot down in bounds. Anyone know the rules on this?

Bullsh_t!!!

He had a foot and his fingers clearly touched the ground before touching the ball. Refs officially suck

When you go out of bounds, you need to re-establish yourself on the field of play before making a play. He clearly did not get his other foot inbounds (this is what they mean by re-establishing), so the ruling on the field was overturned.

2 points of reference. not necessarily feet. I rest my case, all officials suck

no, read the rules. Hands don't count.

 

[Nitemare]

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: Nitemare
A challenge. He clearly was not out of bounds when he first touched the ball, but only had one foot down in bounds. Anyone know the rules on this?

Bullsh_t!!!

He had a foot and his fingers clearly touched the ground before touching the ball. Refs officially suck

When you go out of bounds, you need to re-establish yourself on the field of play before making a play. He clearly did not get his other foot inbounds (this is what they mean by re-establishing), so the ruling on the field was overturned.

2 points of reference. not necessarily feet. I rest my case, all officials suck

Got a link?

last receiver from Philly, laying on the ground clearly did not get 2 feet in before touching out of bounds.

 

[Fenixgoon]

Originally posted by: gabemcg
EAGLES!!!

 

[TwiceOver]

Well I am going to go take a nap. This game is over.

 

[BigJ]

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: Nitemare
A challenge. He clearly was not out of bounds when he first touched the ball, but only had one foot down in bounds. Anyone know the rules on this?

Bullsh_t!!!

He had a foot and his fingers clearly touched the ground before touching the ball. Refs officially suck

When you go out of bounds, you need to re-establish yourself on the field of play before making a play. He clearly did not get his other foot inbounds (this is what they mean by re-establishing), so the ruling on the field was overturned.

2 points of reference. not necessarily feet. I rest my case, all officials suck

Got a link?

last receiver from Philly, laying on the ground clearly did not get 2 feet in before touching out of bounds.

He didn't go out of bounds then come back in. An offensive player can't re-establish themselves at all once they go out of bounds.

 

[Muadib]

Whew!!

 

[BigJ]

Bad play calling by the Eagles right there.

 

[Nitemare]

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: Nitemare
A challenge. He clearly was not out of bounds when he first touched the ball, but only had one foot down in bounds. Anyone know the rules on this?

Bullsh_t!!!

He had a foot and his fingers clearly touched the ground before touching the ball. Refs officially suck

When you go out of bounds, you need to re-establish yourself on the field of play before making a play. He clearly did not get his other foot inbounds (this is what they mean by re-establishing), so the ruling on the field was overturned.

2 points of reference. not necessarily feet. I rest my case, all officials suck

Got a link?

last receiver from Philly, laying on the ground clearly did not get 2 feet in before touching out of bounds.

He didn't go out of bounds then come back in. An offensive player can't re-establish themselves at all once they go out of bounds.

Did he get two feet down before he rolled out of bounds?

 

[BigJ]

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: Nitemare

Originally posted by: Nitemare
A challenge. He clearly was not out of bounds when he first touched the ball, but only had one foot down in bounds. Anyone know the rules on this?

Bullsh_t!!!

He had a foot and his fingers clearly touched the ground before touching the ball. Refs officially suck

When you go out of bounds, you need to re-establish yourself on the field of play before making a play. He clearly did not get his other foot inbounds (this is what they mean by re-establishing), so the ruling on the field was overturned.

2 points of reference. not necessarily feet. I rest my case, all officials suck

Got a link?

last receiver from Philly, laying on the ground clearly did not get 2 feet in before touching out of bounds.

He didn't go out of bounds then come back in. An offensive player can't re-establish themselves at all once they go out of bounds.

Did he get two feet down before he rolled out of bounds?

He didn't roll at all. It's a completely different rule for the Eagles receiver, the situations have nothing to do with each other. He had control of the ball, hit the ground, and had control of the ball after hitting the ground. It was a catch.

EDIT: Wait, I think we're talking about two different plays here. My bad. I thought you had moved on to the play after that and was questioning it.

As for the receiver that fumbled, he did have two feet down before he rolled out of bounds. Obviously he did, because he tripped himself up which called him to fall and fumble.

 

[asm0deus]

McNabb is my hero, so is westbrook. EAGLES, time to get dirty!

 

[tennesota]

Originally posted by: BigJ
Bad play calling by the Eagles right there.

But not as bad as the Vikes "fake field goal" attempt.

 

[acemcmac]

this is gunna be pretty good

 

[BigJ]

Originally posted by: tennesota

Originally posted by: BigJ
Bad play calling by the Eagles right there.

But not as bad as the Vikes "fake field goal" attempt.

It was not a bad play call at all by the Vikes. If Moss pulls his head out of his ass, that's a touchdown.

 

[Nitemare]

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: tennesota

Originally posted by: BigJ
Bad play calling by the Eagles right there.

But not as bad as the Vikes "fake field goal" attempt.

It was not a bad play call at all by the Vikes. If Moss pulls his head out of his ass, that's a touchdown.

Doubt if he could pull it out. I imagine that fro would lock it in...


Second half

 

[Led Zeppelin]

It looks like snow is headed for Philly, probably won't be much of an impact though.

 

[Nitemare]

Vikings into Philly territory

 

[spidey07]

that better be an incomplete pass.

If not then they need to strip the patriots superbowl for their playoff game against oakland years back.

 

[BigJ]

That was a fumble, Vikings got a break.

 

[spidey07]

Originally posted by: BigJ
That was a fumble, Vikings got a break.

incomplete pass. that whole arm moving forward BS.

 

[BigJ]

Originally posted by: spidey07

Originally posted by: BigJ
That was a fumble, Vikings got a break.

incomplete pass. that whole arm moving forward BS.

In the replay, his arm wasn't moving forward at all, it was stripped going back. Vikings got a huge break on that because the ref blew the whistle and ruled it incomplete.

 

[BigJ]

And Bennet blows a first down.

 

[BigJ]

:| Picked!

 

[spidey07]

Originally posted by: BigJ

Originally posted by: spidey07

Originally posted by: BigJ
That was a fumble, Vikings got a break.

incomplete pass. that whole arm moving forward BS.

In the replay, his arm wasn't moving forward at all, it was stripped going back. Vikings got a huge break on that because the ref blew the whistle and ruled it incomplete.

oh I agree. I just think its BS. It should be a fumble, but ever since that patriots/raiders playoff in the snow they let QBs get away with what "should" be a fumble and call it an incomplete pass.