Duck hunting protester shot in the face

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
pot calling the kettle black much?

you know what...you are one of the first ones of the new batch of trolls that caught my eye. Where did you all come from? Did a giant troll sperm pod hatch somewhere and this was the first forum you mouth breathers saw?
 

Broheim

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2011
4,587
3
81
you know what...you are one of the first ones of the new batch of trolls that caught my eye. Where did you all come from? Did a giant troll sperm pod hatch somewhere and this was the first forum you mouth breathers saw?

translation: "you don't agree with me so I'm going to label you a troll lolk"

other people's opinions are just as valid as yours, and if you think I'm trolling by simply not agreeing with you then you have never seen real trolling...
 

frostedflakes

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
7,925
1
81
What kind of idiot would be protesting in a lake between hunters and the birds they're aiming at?
 

Broheim

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2011
4,587
3
81
ontopic:
the police should investigate whether or not the hunter is at fault here before judgement is passed on either of them (which I believe is foundation of the American judicial system).

I personally don't agree with her (I have a hunting license although I rarely "use it") but that hardly warrants shooting her.
 

Alone

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2006
7,490
0
0
This will probably cause serious psychological damage.

...she might have to see a quack.

:awe:
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,280
14,702
146
shut up troll

that chick should do time for criminal trespass and being fucking ugly

Criminal trespass not found. Nothing in the story says it was a private lake nor that the protesters were trespassing in any way...and being fucking ugly isn't a crime...even though perhaps it should be...

In the end, the shooter is responsible for knowing what he's shooting at...and where his shot is going to end up.
The woman, however, is a fucking idiot for getting amongst the fowl during hunting season.

Will the hunter be prosecuted? I doubt it...
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
ontopic:
the police should investigate whether or not the hunter is at fault here before judgement is passed on either of them (which I believe is foundation of the American judicial system).

I personally don't agree with her (I have a hunting license although I rarely "use it") but that hardly warrants shooting her.
Australia...................................
 

misle

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2000
3,371
0
76
More Info

Rod Drew of Field Game Australia chief executive said "we don't want accidents and it's tragic that this has happened".

"But the reality is, we have raised these issues for years of people going into the water to protest," he said,

"We respect their right to do that, but wetlands and guns is not the right place to do it.

"The protesters continuingly break the human safety laws by going into the water before 10am and very few of them understand the safety zone of a shotgun."

The woman was shot at about 9.20am.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Rod Drew of Field Game Australia chief executive said "we don't want accidents and it's tragic that this has happened".

"But the reality is, we have raised these issues for years of people going into the water to protest," he said,

"We respect their right to do that, but wetlands and guns is not the right place to do it.

"The protesters continuingly break the human safety laws by going into the water before 10am and very few of them understand the safety zone of a shotgun."

The woman was shot at about 9.20am.

Well, this seems to indicate she was at least somewhat at fault since it appears she was legally not supposed to be in the water at that time.

Still, the hunter needs to be sure no one is in the field of fire.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Well, this seems to indicate she was at least somewhat at fault since it appears she was legally not supposed to be in the water at that time.

Still, the hunter needs to be sure no one is in the field of fire.

It's like someone jumping in the line of fire of a shooting range. She's at fault. She broke the law. Hunter was just doing his thing.