SlowSpyder
Lifer
- Jan 12, 2005
- 17,305
- 1,002
- 126
If she's that retarded, she should come over here and protest during deer season. Deer hunters don't use little pellets...
we already have enough crazyass people here, no need to invite more over.If she's that retarded, she should come over here and protest during deer season. Deer hunters don't use little pellets...
Seriously, the hunter should have been more careful.
You're fuckin' with me...right?
did you read and understand my post about how your judicial system is based on the principle of "innocent until proven guilty"? why shouldn't that principle apply to something that happened in another country... I mean, instead of outright blaming either of them, people should let the police/prosecuter decide who's at fault here.
You DID read that this happened in Australia...right?
Well, this seems to indicate she was at least somewhat at fault since it appears she was legally not supposed to be in the water at that time.
Still, the hunter needs to be sure no one is in the field of fire.
That is like saying a driver should get in trouble for hitting someone trying to cross a freeway.
It's like someone jumping in the line of fire of a shooting range. She's at fault. She broke the law. Hunter was just doing his thing.
Please quote the article where it says he knew she was in front of him.The hunter saw people in the water and decided to shoot anyways. He knew what he was doing.
If you are hunting a deer and person steps infront of the deer, you can't just decide you are going to shoot them to get to the deer. This is basically waht the shooter did. He saw her, he aimed, and he shot her.
its a shame he didnt kill the stupid bitch
Only ATOT could take joy in someone being shot in the face just for standing up for something she believes in.![]()
Only ATOT could take joy in someone being shot in the face just for standing up for something she believes in.![]()
Fucking wingnut idiot. They already crippled Australia's gun rights. Too bad she lived. Fuck her.