WhipperSnapper
Lifer
- Oct 30, 2004
- 11,442
- 32
- 91
Absolutely not.
Craig, I think we will have to talk a lot more, but honestly it that you have no idea of what free markets are, and why they are important. You believe you have moved past free-markets, by regulating markets, and you are wrong.
So, I guess it's possible you have read Adam Smith, but you didn't understand it.
What about Atlas Shrugged? Have you read Atlas Shrugged? Why not toss Atlas Shrugged in there as well, a more modern bible of laissez-faire capitalism and individual rights, while we're talking about Adam Smith?
I used to love Atlas Shrugged and Ayn Rand's Objectivist philosophy and I thought that laissez-faire capitalism was the way to go, too, until I acquired more first-hand knowledge of the real world and was forced to reexamine ideas I had naively and idealistically adopted in my youth (such as the insane notion that legitimate conflicts of interest do not exist among rational men). What I have since discovered is that while we might hope to have absolute freedom and unlimited resources as an ideal, that in reality resources exist in finite quantities, that humans are interdependent, that it is impossible to have true absolute freedom, and that in actuality real laissez-faire capitalism, while perhaps providing de jure (by law) freedom, would not maximize real (de facto) freedom but would instead decrease the amount of real freedom.
Last edited: