blackangst1
Lifer
- Feb 23, 2005
- 22,902
- 2,360
- 126
You have to remember how ideologues function. All ambiguous data proves them right.
If something good happend, the free market ideologue credits the free market elements in the economy.
If something bad happenes, the free market ideologue blames the governmental involvement.
Isn't it obvious, they wonder, how the free market ideology is right?
So, when a 'free market' ideologue has the 'cesspool' (credit to Greenman) he's usually not forced to face put in front of him, naturally, he reacts with the compassion the free market lacks, and to keep from having to face his ideology would lead to that sort of thing, he decides that it's proof the free market wouldn't allow it to happen.
If someone could tie him down and show him the free market does cause those things, he'd start rationalizing why they're ok.
It's a lot of work just to get them to drop the ideology and actually deal rationally.
You know there are ideologues on both sides, right?
If something good happend, the progressive ideologue credits government involvement "see look what we did".
If something bad happens, the progressive ideologue blames too much free market reign.
Im sure that oversight was unintentional, right?
