Drone came within 200 feet of airliner over New York at 1,750 ft

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,894
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
3-5-2013

It was a very close call.

Pilot says the Drone was within 200 feet of the Jetliner.

3-5-2013

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/04/us/new-york-drone-report/index.html

Drone came within 200 feet of airliner over New York



An unmanned drone came within 200 feet of a commercial jet over New York, triggering an FBI appeal to the public for any information about the unusual and potentially dangerous incident.


The crew of Alitalia Flight 608 approaching John F. Kennedy airport on Monday reported the sighting.

The FBI expanded on the FAA report, saying in a statement that the Alitalia flight from Rome was roughly three miles from runway 31R when the incident occurred at an altitude of approximately 1,750 feet.

The unmanned aircraft, described by the FBI as black and no more than three feet wide with four propellers, came within 200 feet of the Boeing jetliner.

The FBI is asking anyone with information about the unmanned aircraft or the operator to contact us," said Special Agent in Charge John Giacalone.



http://www.examiner.com/article/drone-over-brooklyn-alitalia-pilot-has-sighting

Drone over Brooklyn: Alitalia pilot has sighting



A drone over Brooklyn was spotted by a pilot. The drone was reported by an Alitalia pilot as he was flying in to JFK airport. He quickly called radio control to report what he saw.


"We saw a drone, a drone aircraft," the pilot can be heard telling controllers. According to the report, the unmanned or remote-control aircraft was spotted about five miles west of the airport in New York. The Alitalia flight was able to land safely despite the other aircraft being close by.


A drone over Brooklyn or any area where planes fly could cause a disaster. They could easily get sucked in to the engines of these bigger planes or they could collide with the aircraft in mid-air.


For recreational hobbyists, flying remote-controlled planes is only allowed by the FAA up to 400 feet in the air, and within sight of the operator.

The alleged drone over Brooklyn was about 1,500 feet in the air. The FAA has launched an investigation.
 
Last edited:

Arglebargle

Senior member
Dec 2, 2006
892
1
81
Drones are getting cheaper and cheaper; pretty soon, it will be feasible for anyone to have one. I resarched drones a little over ten years ago, and revisited it last year. The drone proliferation was astounding. Every country can get militarized drones. Many are making their own. And it's only going to get more common.

It's going to be an interesting new issue.
 

RampantAndroid

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2004
6,591
3
81
The FAA is investigating...can we hold off on the doom and gloom until we know it's not someone flying a homemade drone illegally? Sure - there's air space rules for a reason, but let's not jump the gun.
 

Gintaras

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2000
1,892
1
71
Is a drone 5 miles away from a real airplane going to cause problems?

How long you think for an aircraft like Airbus A330(I belive it was) would take to fly 5 miles?

And coming to a landing to JFK over the Brooklyn, aircraft could have been @ 1500-2000 feet...if not lower...

It's not about a canadian geese....
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,381
96
86
How long you think for an aircraft like Airbus A330(I belive it was) would take to fly 5 miles?

And coming to a landing to JFK over the Brooklyn, aircraft could have been @ 1500-2000 feet...if not lower...

It's not about a canadian geese....


landing speed is what 200-300 mph? so thats at least a minute or so.
 

RampantAndroid

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2004
6,591
3
81
landing speed is what 200-300 mph? so thats at least a minute or so.

And what about when it's in a drop zone and a skydiver can't see it in time to avoid it? What about at night when a plane not equipped with radar "stumbles" on a drone? It's absolutely a problem and it's why the FAA has regulations around this.
 

ericlp

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2000
6,133
219
106
yeah what happens when you build a drone with a micro processor say a credit card size raspberry pi or just an android phone with a custom app connected to the net and 10 megapixel camera with 30x optical zoom lens that can stay in the air for 48++ hours with enough fire power to kill a 20x20' square area ... Basically a fling kite with a few grenades stealth electric motors / solar to recharge the batts and very aerodynamic to stay in the air for days searching / hunting for a face ... when it finds it ... it swoops in "KABOOM" for the kill. Will be a whole new interesting field. Won't even need a human operator... A silent killer ... Just upload a few photos of your target/GPS work or Home address, send a few of them up and game over... Just wait for the loud bang...

I mean really...... How hard would it be to make one? With todays tech you could probably do it in a few months ... High profile people should probably be worried as tech keeps getting smaller and more efficient.
 
Last edited:

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,894
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
It was a very close call.

Pilot says the Drone was within 200 feet of the Jetliner.

3-5-2013

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/04/us/new-york-drone-report/index.html

Drone came within 200 feet of airliner over New York



An unmanned drone came within 200 feet of a commercial jet over New York, triggering an FBI appeal to the public for any information about the unusual and potentially dangerous incident.


The crew of Alitalia Flight 608 approaching John F. Kennedy airport on Monday reported the sighting.

The FBI expanded on the FAA report, saying in a statement that the Alitalia flight from Rome was roughly three miles from runway 31R when the incident occurred at an altitude of approximately 1,750 feet.

The unmanned aircraft, described by the FBI as black and no more than three feet wide with four propellers, came within 200 feet of the Boeing jetliner.

The FBI is asking anyone with information about the unmanned aircraft or the operator to contact us," said Special Agent in Charge John Giacalone.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
The unmanned aircraft, described by the FBI as black and no more than three feet wide with four propellers, came within 200 feet of the Boeing jetliner.

I somehow think this was a remote control plane that went off course rather than a drone. Maybe it was sucked up into an updraft and that's why it was flying at that altitude.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
I somehow think this was a remote control plane that went off course rather than a drone. Maybe it was sucked up into an updraft and that's why it was flying at that altitude.

Possibly. It's kinda hard to see a 3' remote controlled plane at 1,750 feet.
 

monovillage

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2008
8,444
1
0
Obviously drones are too dangerous for the public to own and operate. The government needs to do something to get them out of the wrong hands and keep them exclusively in the hands of the police and the military.
 

Attic

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2010
4,282
2
76
yeah what happens when you build a drone with a micro processor say a credit card size raspberry pi or just an android phone with a custom app connected to the net and 10 megapixel camera with 30x optical zoom lens that can stay in the air for 48++ hours with enough fire power to kill a 20x20' square area ... Basically a fling kite with a few grenades stealth electric motors / solar to recharge the batts and very aerodynamic to stay in the air for days searching / hunting for a face ... when it finds it ... it swoops in "KABOOM" for the kill. Will be a whole new interesting field. Won't even need a human operator... A silent killer ... Just upload a few photos of your target/GPS work or Home address, send a few of them up and game over... Just wait for the loud bang...

I mean really...... How hard would it be to make one? With todays tech you could probably do it in a few months ... High profile people should probably be worried as tech keeps getting smaller and more efficient.

Ya, this. Always going to be evil hands at work, ensuring destructive forces remain out of those hands becomes more and more difficult as technology progresses. Not really an easy solution for a country with a growing lack of patriotism, morals, and opportunity.
 

Druidx

Platinum Member
Jul 16, 2002
2,971
0
76
Why is the OP always the 1st response to every topic he starts?
Forgetful? Split personality?
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,381
7,444
136
Obviously drones are too dangerous for the public to own and operate. The government needs to do something to get them out of the wrong hands and keep them exclusively in the hands of the police and the military.

That will be the law of the United States. It's just a matter of time.

In fact, isn't it already illegal to violate airspace?
 

Druidx

Platinum Member
Jul 16, 2002
2,971
0
76
That will be the law of the United States. It's just a matter of time.

In fact, isn't it already illegal to violate airspace?

When I started flying Spads and Quads I had to do an AMA read and sign to get insurance. They recommended not being within 5 miles of an airport or notify them if you were closer. Legally I think it's 3 miles.
 

monovillage

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2008
8,444
1
0
That will be the law of the United States. It's just a matter of time.

In fact, isn't it already illegal to violate airspace?

Yes, but i'm talking about a total ban on radio controlled aircraft for all civilians.