blackangst1
Lifer
- Feb 23, 2005
- 22,902
- 2,359
- 126
I'm not. (playing us and them, comment mine)
That's what this whole stupid right wing culture war is all about. They're the only ones actually waging it.
lmao youre a joke
I'm not. (playing us and them, comment mine)
That's what this whole stupid right wing culture war is all about. They're the only ones actually waging it.
It would seem self-evident that Republicans are opposed to wealth redistribution only when Republicans aren't the beneficiaries.Interesting that Republicans don't seem to have a problem with redistribution of wealth all of a sudden, haha. I wonder what's different?
So, you're saying "bothsides" then?
There's only one side doing the consistent "us vs them" song and dance.
But only one 'side' has political leadership that acts like that.Really, having watched the conversations go back and forth, I'd say it is definitely both sides, with everyone making assumptions about the other and neither caring about actual compromise as long as they can post some links and exclaim "i'm right you're wrong".
So you didn't actually watch that NRA video I linked for you earlier?lmao youre a joke
Oddly enough though when Democrats want to redistribute wealth to poor people republicans say that’s bad. When Republicans want to redistribute wealth to farmers it’s good. Why one and not the other?
.............. Explain finance to me then.Because farmers actually work doing value creating work that produces stuff we want. Poor people either don’t work or do jobs that produce very little of actual value which is why they’re paid minimum-wage.
Because farmers actually work doing value creating work that produces stuff we want. Poor people either don’t work or do jobs that produce very little of actual value which is why they’re paid minimum-wage.
We already know the answer to that. They don't.Apparently what they are making isn't valuable enough according to the market, otherwise people would pay more for it and they wouldn't need to have our wealth redistributed to them.
Someday you guys are going to have to decide if you like the free market or not.
We already know the answer to that. They don't.
lmao youre a joke
Denial isn't a river in Egypt. It's just like Michael Moore offered- Voting for Trump was a giant irrational Fuck You! to the rest of America & the world. And now those who did so will argue it was right even as it came around to bite them in the ass. Decades of relentless right wing mind fuck set 'em up for it.
Apparently what they are making isn't valuable enough according to the market, otherwise people would pay more for it and they wouldn't need to have our wealth redistributed to them.
Someday you guys are going to have to decide if you like the free market or not.
You're a terrible human being and a terrible American.I’d be happy if you’d cut out the payouts to farmers. I’d obviously rather nonoayouts like this go to anyone, not just farmers. But if the government absolutely *must* make transfer payments to redistribute wealth then the poors should be the very last to get those redistributions. We’d probably be better off burning the money to heat government buildings than paying the poors for sucking at life.
Thats the platform he ran on, and those voted for him voted that way because of it. This isnt news.
I’d be happy if you’d cut out the payouts to farmers. I’d obviously rather nonoayouts like this go to anyone, not just farmers. But if the government absolutely *must* make transfer payments to redistribute wealth then the poors should be the very last to get those redistributions. We’d probably be better off burning the money to heat government buildings than paying the poors for sucking at life.
I’d be happy if you’d cut out the payouts to farmers. I’d obviously rather nonoayouts like this go to anyone, not just farmers. But if the government absolutely *must* make transfer payments to redistribute wealth then the poors should be the very last to get those redistributions. We’d probably be better off burning the money to heat government buildings than paying the poors for sucking at life.
Yeh, it's perfectly obvious that a lot of poor children suck at picking parents, too-
https://www.childrensdefense.org/policy/policy-priorities/child-poverty/
Yeh, it's perfectly obvious that a lot of poor children suck at picking parents, too-
https://www.childrensdefense.org/policy/policy-priorities/child-poverty/
If they manage to survive to being grown up. Which they won't, if you had your way.On the plus side, their parents are giving them great examples for what not to do and be when they grow up.
On the plus side, their parents are giving them great examples for what not to do and be when they grow up.
You go on as if being poor is a state of moral depravity. It's understandable coming from a person who worships at the altar of greed in the temple of Mammon.
eah right!! Only an idiot would deflect like that,l when you an everybody else knows Jhhnn owned your ass!!!TRIGGERED!!On the plus side, their parents are giving them great examples for what not to do and be when they grow up.
How the fuck are you supposed to buy food from the farmers if all the people that "suck at life" stop going to all their "low value" jobs.I’d be happy if you’d cut out the payouts to farmers. I’d obviously rather nonoayouts like this go to anyone, not just farmers. But if the government absolutely *must* make transfer payments to redistribute wealth then the poors should be the very last to get those redistributions. We’d probably be better off burning the money to heat government buildings than paying the poors for sucking at life.