Don't use ad blockers if you like AnandTech.

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
In turn, the message to advertisers:
- Irritating, flashing, moving ads don't make me want to buy your product. They instead generate an increasing desire to inflict injury. Pop-ups are in a similar class.
- Sound in ads is not ok.
- If your adserver is slow, and is constantly holding up page loads, that increases chances of earning a block. dynamic2.anandtech.com was like this - it would constantly cause pages to take considerably longer to load, sometimes to the point of causing a timeout and failed pageload.
- If I find that your Flash advertisement is generating a significant CPU load, that also increases the chance of earning a block.

- I paid for the subscription option back when it was available, and might consider something like that if it were offered again.
 
Last edited:

ric1287

Diamond Member
Nov 29, 2005
4,845
0
0
Or use Chrome. Because of the way Chrome works, its adblockers still download the ad, they just hide it from you.

What Chrome adblocker works the same as ABP for firefox? I haven't found one
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
Under consideration. Will send recommendation to the board for further review by June 1.

/edit: Successfully fastracked. AT has been unblocked.
 

Leros

Lifer
Jul 11, 2004
21,867
7
81
In turn, the message to advertisers:
- Irritating, flashing, moving ads don't make me want to buy your product. They instead generate an increasing desire to inflict injury. Pop-ups are in a similar class.
- Sound in ads is not ok.
- If your adserver is slow, and is constantly holding up page loads, that increases chances of earning a block.
- If I find that your Flash advertisement is generating a significant CPU load, that also increases the chance of earning a block.

- I paid for the subscription option back when it was available, and might consider something like that if it were offered again.

This is why I block ads.
 

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,122
778
126
In turn, the message to advertisers:
- Irritating, flashing, moving ads don't make me want to buy your product. They instead generate an increasing desire to inflict injury. Pop-ups are in a similar class.
- Sound in ads is not ok.
- If your adserver is slow, and is constantly holding up page loads, that increases chances of earning a block. dynamic2.anandtech.com was like this - it would constantly cause pages to take considerably longer to load, sometimes to the point of causing a timeout and failed pageload.
- If I find that your Flash advertisement is generating a significant CPU load, that also increases the chance of earning a block.

- I paid for the subscription option back when it was available, and might consider something like that if it were offered again.
This
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
I've understood this for years, and have never used an ad blocker.

In fact, I'll even click on an ad a few times a week to give a site some extra cash :)
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
In turn, the message to advertisers:
- Irritating, flashing, moving ads don't make me want to buy your product. They instead generate an increasing desire to inflict injury. Pop-ups are in a similar class.
- Sound in ads is not ok.
- If your adserver is slow, and is constantly holding up page loads, that increases chances of earning a block. dynamic2.anandtech.com was like this - it would constantly cause pages to take considerably longer to load, sometimes to the point of causing a timeout and failed pageload.
- If I find that your Flash advertisement is generating a significant CPU load, that also increases the chance of earning a block.

Amen. Ad blocking sprang up to combat ads run amok. It's the fault of the assholes who tried to squeeze every penny out of visitors with obnoxious ads that were coded so poorly they caused problem at client level.
 

TridenT

Lifer
Sep 4, 2006
16,800
45
91
Or use Chrome. Because of the way Chrome works, its adblockers still download the ad, they just hide it from you.

Which is the most annoying way that Chrome blocks ads. That's really fucking annoying. I don't want those to load at all. Reason #1 for not using Chrome.

Advertisers can go diaf with those extremely annoying and irrelevant ads.
 

Homerboy

Lifer
Mar 1, 2000
30,890
5,001
126
honestly, what adds at Anandtech are THAT horribly distracting? There are 2 banner ads. One at the top, which goes out of site the second you scroll down to the 3rd message in a thread, and one on the left, that you generally can't see until you scroll down to the 3rd message. I don't EVER recall a horribly annoying/flashing/neon colored/with sound ad ever on Anandtech.
 

mfenn

Elite Member
Jan 17, 2010
22,400
5
71
www.mfenn.com
What Chrome adblocker works the same as ABP for firefox? I haven't found one

Which is the most annoying way that Chrome blocks ads. That's really fucking annoying. I don't want those to load at all. Reason #1 for not using Chrome.

Advertisers can go diaf with those extremely annoying and irrelevant ads.

<------------------ Point

<------------------ Your head

If you have a decently fast CPU, then you wont even notice the behavior (esp. with Chrome 5 and Adthwart).
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,044
10,533
126
I was wondering what had happened to some of their articles, I thought it was just "one of those things" :^D

I really don't have a problem with ads, and I'll turn them on on occasion. I turn them back off when the ad servers go to shit. A couple weeks ago I was in Chrome, and a site wouldn't load for me. It was waiting for a non responsive ad server. I had to open Firefox so I could view the site. That's the kind of thing that bothers me. I don't mind seeing a couple of banners though. I'd prefer if they were embedded in the page, and not loaded by foreign servers.
 

TridenT

Lifer
Sep 4, 2006
16,800
45
91
<------------------ Point

<------------------ Your head

If you have a decently fast CPU, then you wont even notice the behavior (esp. with Chrome 5 and Adthwart).

I have a C2D E7200 @ 3.6Ghz and I fucking notice it still.
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Sorry but bandwidth and security concerns prevent the remote side of the network from loading anything like that here. It's done on the Earth side by firewall so whether the host has adblocking configured or not they never reach a host PC.
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Now you're just talking out of your ass. It doesn't happen on Chrome 5 and with new versions of Adthwart. Get back to your fruit loops

Could be his video card. I had a Trident card years ago and it sucked. Even flying toasters (after dark) were choppy and the toast never got dark! :eek:
 

Leros

Lifer
Jul 11, 2004
21,867
7
81
Sorry but bandwidth and security concerns prevent the remote side of the network from loading anything like that here. It's done on the Earth side by firewall so whether the host has adblocking configured or not they never reach a host PC.

So you run the entire ship through a proxy which removes ads? I suppose it does image compression and other stuff like that?
 

TridenT

Lifer
Sep 4, 2006
16,800
45
91
Now you're just talking out of your ass. It doesn't happen on Chrome 5 and with new versions of Adthwart. Get back to your fruit loops

When I used it on Chrome 4 or whatever and the Adthwart version I noticed. I'll go back to Chrome at version 7 with Adthwart version 99999999999999. >_> Maybe then they'll have fixed it. It isn't fixed if they still load at all, PERIOD.
 

MotionMan

Lifer
Jan 11, 2006
17,124
12
81
In turn, the message to advertisers:
- Irritating, flashing, moving ads don't make me want to buy your product. They instead generate an increasing desire to inflict injury. Pop-ups are in a similar class.
- Sound in ads is not ok.
- If your adserver is slow, and is constantly holding up page loads, that increases chances of earning a block. dynamic2.anandtech.com was like this - it would constantly cause pages to take considerably longer to load, sometimes to the point of causing a timeout and failed pageload.
- If I find that your Flash advertisement is generating a significant CPU load, that also increases the chance of earning a block.

So this.

MotionMan
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,574
13,804
126
www.anyf.ca
I only block popups, and annoying ads. I have no reason to block the rest. It costs lot of money to run a site like this. Even with the ads, the cost goes up higher then the income. More visitors = more income = need for much bigger infrastructure = more cost. Unless you have FIOS and host a site like this from home, it's always more expensive then what the ad revenue brings in.
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,696
4,658
75
In turn, the message to advertisers:
- If your adserver is slow, and is constantly holding up page loads, that increases chances of earning a block. dynamic2.anandtech.com was like this - it would constantly cause pages to take considerably longer to load, sometimes to the point of causing a timeout and failed pageload.
- If I find that your Flash advertisement is generating a significant CPU load, that also increases the chance of earning a block.
These are my two main issues with advertising. I'm not sure yet if the first applies here - I just decided to try ads - but I know it's a problem on some sites with Google ads. If an entire page loaded without ads, then let Greasemonkey scripts run, then loaded ads, I probably wouldn't mind even if it interfered with any Greasemonkey scripts I designed to hide the ads.

As far as the second issue goes, I'm addicted to distributed computing and don't want any unnecessary cycles going anywhere else, but especially to ads in my browser. Flash is the worst, and I'm also blocking those with NoScript, but even a page full of animated gifs, such as a smilies page on other boards, is too much for me.

Or put another way...

Every cycle's sacred. ():)
Every cycle's great. :awe:
When a cycle's wasted, :eek:
I get quite irate! :mad: