• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Don't Mess With Texas PETA.

Seeing this makes me sad that I'm having pizza for dinner tonight. I wish I had some veal in the fridge 🙁
 
People throwing up the anti-peta flag already I see. They have a very valid point in this case in my opinion and this isn't extreme or anything.

I see no reason for it to be taken down.
 
Originally posted by: Leetman
People throwing up the anti-peta flag already I see. They have a very valid point in this case in my opinion and this isn't extreme or anything.

I see no reason for it to be taken down.

Because most people don't want to see it.
 
Originally posted by: Leetman
People throwing up the anti-peta flag already I see. They have a very valid point in this case in my opinion and this isn't extreme or anything.

I see no reason for it to be taken down.

No? You think it's ok for children to see graphic depictions of their pets being maimed?

:roll:
 
Originally posted by: DurocShark
Originally posted by: Leetman
People throwing up the anti-peta flag already I see. They have a very valid point in this case in my opinion and this isn't extreme or anything.

I see no reason for it to be taken down.

No? You think it's ok for children to see graphic depictions of their pets being maimed?

:roll:

No, because they should think the world is made of fluffy clouds and candy roads...
Let's keep them ignorant for as long as possible.
 
Originally posted by: DurocShark
Originally posted by: Leetman
People throwing up the anti-peta flag already I see. They have a very valid point in this case in my opinion and this isn't extreme or anything.

I see no reason for it to be taken down.

No? You think it's ok for children to see graphic depictions of their pets being maimed?

:roll:

How is it any different than a fish with a hook in its lip? Fish can be kept as pets also.

And this was far from graphic, a dog with a fish hook in its mouth? It's nothing more than the truth..
 
Ok.... here's a challenge for anti-PETA people. If you believed fishing was cruel to animals, how would you convince the population? Let's see if you can do a better job.
 
So show pictures of children being gutted like deer. That would be ok by your logic.

The point is, people don't want to see it, so it will be taken down.
 
Originally posted by: Nebor
So show pictures of children being gutted like deer. That would be ok by your logic.

The point is, people don't want to see it, so it will be taken down.

No that wouldn't be okay by my logic. A child with a fish hook through his mouth, yes. There's nothing graphic about the sign they had up. A sign with anything being gutted would be graphic.
 
Originally posted by: TuxDave
Originally posted by: Nebor
The anti-PETA response

If the girl was pierced by having an unsterilized serrated hook, hidden in her food, attached to a string that was constantly tugging, then I guess it's a fair argument.

I'm not PETA activist, I just love being devil's advocate.

Duh, how do you think people get piercings? With guns or something?
 
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Leetman
People throwing up the anti-peta flag already I see. They have a very valid point in this case in my opinion and this isn't extreme or anything.

I see no reason for it to be taken down.

Because most people don't want to see it.

he probably meant to write "good reason".
 
Originally posted by: gopunk
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Leetman
People throwing up the anti-peta flag already I see. They have a very valid point in this case in my opinion and this isn't extreme or anything.

I see no reason for it to be taken down.

Because most people don't want to see it.

he probably meant to write "good reason".

Indeed.
 
Back
Top