Does this scare the hell out of anyone else?

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,466
3
76
Originally posted by: DOSfan
Originally posted by: Rob9874
Originally posted by: ThaPerculator

Because the dude that physically busts his arse all day will never see $100k....

Sounds like good incentive to get an education. I'm sick of the victim mentality that says, I'm going to choose to make poor decisions in life so I have to work hard for no pay, and I want society to feel sorry for me.

Lets see...

1) I have an education.
2) I do not have the victim mentality.
3) I have not made "poor" decisions. (I have made some bad ones, but not as a habit.)
4) I do not care if society feels sorry for me or not.

And I make... About $25,000 a year.

And guess what? This is almost 100% more than I made last year. (Which is about 50% more than I have ever made in a year.)

So, I guess it is all my fault then?

So when I get my paycheck, and I have 20% taken out just in Federal Taxes alone I shouldn't get upset?

Let's face it. You will not agree with me, and I sure as hell won't agree with you. But the system as is, isn't worth a damn. Something needs to be done. If not something like Clark's proposal, then you suggest something better.

In your case since you contribute far less to the maintaining of the government shouldn't those that contribute more have their votes count more? After all that is only fair... It would be like shareholders, those that choose to not pay in, have no say, those all the way in have the ultimate decision making power.

Sorry, but if you have a good education and only make 25k a year, you are incredibly stupid in your career decision making... that is unless you are a teacher inw hich case you would be making more if the Board of Education was dissolved
 

The Sauce

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 1999
4,739
34
91
Originally posted by: slag
it sucks for those wealthy people who have worked hard for their money, but it helps redistribute wealth...

So does communism.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,305
136
Originally posted by: thomsbrain
5% of 200K is $10K. shall i arrange a meeting with a 3rd grade math tutor for you? or if that's too expensive for you because you've gotta tighten your belt for those heavy taxes, Windows has a great calculator. Go to Start, Programs, Accessories, Calculator. but you're right, i'd have to do without the moonroof, premium package, SMG, Nav, and 19" wheels. man, it must be really tough to have to make sacrafices like that.
rolleye.gif


and despite being a full time student, i've more than double that 5% in a year. if i worked full time, i'd be making over 100K, and i'd be happy to pay appropriate taxes for that, the same way i'm happy to pay my taxes now.

Ornery, you are correct that it isn't stealing the way we're used to thinking about it. But if Mr. X gets paid $500K a year to sit in his office, play golf, and fire people, he does so because 500 Mr. Y's are working their butts off earning Mr. X's money. Chris Zimmerman makes god knows how many millions each year because he exploits child labor in other countries building Nikes. Tiger Woods gets millions of dollars from Buick because that money didn't go to the people building the cars. Whether you think that's "right" or not is kind of a personal moral thing. But they certainly didn't work their butts off to get it (certainly not as hard as the factory workers). Tiger just happens to have been born with a talent that happens to be worth lots of money. is that "fair?" And who knows about Zimmerman, but it's probably safe to say that he leveraged something other his work ethic to get where he is today. Certainly his company has done that. That's the way America's economy works. We improve our situation by taking the resources of other countries, and even by taking the resources of our own poor. They need us to take their resources, so we exploit that power by giving them unfair wages. Yeah, they could just choose not to work for us, but they'd starve to death. So we're "helping them out" but really it's just a great way to steal AND look like saviors. Is that right? It's not their fault they were born in Malaysia or wherever.

I realize that this forum is largely populated with people with above-average incomes. That's how you afford to maintain hobbies as expensive as high-end computers and electronics. So I'm not expecting to have anyone agree with me, and I'm not even supporting socialism or anything so radical. I'm just trying to remind you that empathy is a trait that many of you seem to have forgotten. No one wants to be the "bad guy," but just realize that if you amass more than the average amount of wealth, it had to come from somewhere, and you know you're not working harder than the guy you took it from. I can't expect everyone to make the truely right choices, but don't kid yourself with your illusions of "fairness." I have more respect for someone who admits what's going on but still chooses to be selfish than someone who plays "see no evil hear no evil speak no evil."
Pardon me for the typo...
rolleye.gif
I think you should know by now that my math is better than that.

As for your whole rant... that's all it is. The rant of a little boy who's never worked an honest day in his life. "Gonna be a big man someday..." But, ooh... you see the unfairness out there, and you want to make it right. Good for you. Too bad nobody ever taught you that stealing is wrong.
 

Ornery

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,022
17
81
"Ornery, you are correct that it isn't stealing the way we're used to thinking about it. But if Mr. X gets paid $500K a year to sit in his office, play golf, and fire people, he does so because 500 Mr. Y's are working their butts off earning Mr. X's money."

Working their butts off earning Mr. X's money? :confused:

Mr. A or shareholders negotiated Mr. X's salery before they hired him. If they were smart enough to hire a guy like Lee Iacocca, those 500 Mr. Y's can thank him for making their company profitable, so they still have jobs. What exactly is a guy like that worth?

You want to tax the piss out of people who create businesses and jobs. WTF would I want to start a business if you're going to lay claim to such a huge chunk of my profit? Ain't really worth the trouble IMO. With unemployment so high, we need a helluva lot more people like Mr. A and Mr. X, than Mr. Y.
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Does this scare the hell out of anyone else?
No because Clark isn't even going to win the Democratic nomination. Of course just like it was in 2000 we'll have to pick the lessor of two weasals

Cept one of those weasels appears to be a socialist so that would make him a minx, right?
Hey choose your poison,when America is willing to settle for less these are the types or people who will run the country

IMHO. Within the next 10 years the democrat party will break apart. In the next 10 following that the republican party will go the same way. Its happened before and it will happen again, and it appears that we are heading down that road.
 

DT4K

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2002
6,944
3
81
Originally posted by: DOSfan
Originally posted by: Shanti

Quit making stuff up.
If you make 25k, after the standard deduction, your taxable income is around 17k. Your tax rate is around 15%, so your total federal taxes should be around $2300.
You pay around 9% of your gross income in federal taxes.
And I got news for you, 9% is not the same as 20%.

But even if you actually did pay 20% of your income in federal taxes, that would mean $5000 a year. And no, even if that were the case, you shouldn't get upset.
At least not nearly as upset as the people who have to pay $50,000 a year in taxes. Why should they have to contribute so much more money than you? I doubt they use the military, roads, school system, social services, etc, etc, any more than you do.

If you want to talk about a truly fair system, not even a flat tax would do.
A truly fair system would require every citizen to contribute the same amount of money. Not the same percentage, but the same amount.
Now obviously this would never be practical, so a flat tax rate is the next best option.

I honestly dont' know why anyone would think a flat tax is not progressive enough.
The rich would still pay far more than the poor. If I make twice as much, I pay twice as much.
But there should be no floor on it. Say we have to have make the rate 12%. If you earn 100 bucks in a year, you should have to pay 12 in taxes.
Just like the guy who makes 100k will have to pay 12k.

Even if the rich still pay far more than their fair share, at least it will remove the disincentive of higher rates for earning more.

Bwahahahahahahaha!!!! Making stuff up? Are you certain? Damn.... I wish I had a way to scan in my pay stubs....

Oh well, you will just have to trust me on this.

My gross weekly pay is about $500. That is assuming, of course, that I do not work the 8-10 hours overtime a week that my supervisers would like all of their employess to do. My weekly Federal Withholding is around $90 a week. Okay, you got me. I rounded a bit. It is a little less than 20%. But no where near 9%.

And just for the record, the only reason I am making around $25K is because I am working the night shift. If I was working days at the same job, I would be making less.

Now, maybe I haven't thought long and hard about what "richer" people than me would have to pay in taxes... (Probably because I am too busy working hard handling 150lb parts all night long.) But you are a damn fool if you think I am not going to get upset about 1/5th of my paycheck being taken by the greedy asshats that think they know what is best for me. I could care less if the government stands or falls. I would not care if all politicians were thrown out of the country. I am not even possitive I would even give a damn if they all died.

But gaddamnit I best be givin' them their money! I feel like the whore, while they are the pimps. Only difference is, at least the whore has something to show for the hard work at the end of the night. Even if it is just stains on clothing.

And let me take it down a notch. When I was doing day labor jobs. Getting paid each day I worked. I worked harder than I do now, and I was paid $6 an hour. You know what that amounts to? $48 dolars a day. What did the government take? $10 dolars a day. Know how I remember? That is about the same amount as a 6 pack of beer, and a sandwich from a good deli. When I realized they were taking out enough for a good lunch each day I was breaking my back, and sweating very personal parts off, while they were sitting in air conditioned offices smoking expensive cigars that they dipped in brandy and cheap sluts, while "discusing" what is best for us, that is when I started to loose what little interest I had left in our "democracy."

And please, before you try to "enlighten" me any further, don't waste your time trying to show me just how wrong I am. Because, I just do not care. I feel the way I feel, and that is all there is to it.

I had intended to answer other peoples questions, but right now I just do not feel like it. Good night.

Oops, I guess you were including social security and medicare taxes, not just federal income tax. So that extra 7.65% would take you up to about 16%. Remember, that's taking into account any refunds you may get back.

Yes, I can see you being upset about having 1/5th of your income taken from you.
But do you really think you should be MORE upset than those who have 1/2 of the money they earned taken away by the government?
They have a lot more to complain about than you do.
Why do you think that you shouldn't have to pay your fair share while other's should have to pay far more than their fair share?

To those who say a flat tax isn't fair, you are right. It isn't fair to those who make more money because they have to pay a larger portion of the cost of maintaining the government, while they get the same or less benefit from government services. But it's the fairest system that would actually be feasible. All of us who aren't rich should be thanking the rich for taking on such a large portion of the cost of government. If everyone had to pay an equal share, the tax rates for those making 20k a year would have to be at least 100%.

You people who claim that high paid executives just sit there and get paid to play golf and smoke cigars are fvcking idiots. These people don't get hired for these jobs by luck (well, maybe a little). They get hired and paid well because they have the talent and skills to help the company succeed. No reasonably successfull business is going to pay someone 500k a year to sit on their asses. They are going to pay them that kind of money only if they will make the company at least 500k more profitable per year. These high paid execs are the one's responsible for making sure that all the employees continue to have jobs.
 

DOSfan

Senior member
Sep 19, 2003
522
0
0
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: DOSfan
Originally posted by: Rob9874
Originally posted by: ThaPerculator

Because the dude that physically busts his arse all day will never see $100k....

Sounds like good incentive to get an education. I'm sick of the victim mentality that says, I'm going to choose to make poor decisions in life so I have to work hard for no pay, and I want society to feel sorry for me.

Lets see...

1) I have an education.
2) I do not have the victim mentality.
3) I have not made "poor" decisions. (I have made some bad ones, but not as a habit.)
4) I do not care if society feels sorry for me or not.

And I make... About $25,000 a year.

And guess what? This is almost 100% more than I made last year. (Which is about 50% more than I have ever made in a year.)

So, I guess it is all my fault then?

So when I get my paycheck, and I have 20% taken out just in Federal Taxes alone I shouldn't get upset?

Let's face it. You will not agree with me, and I sure as hell won't agree with you. But the system as is, isn't worth a damn. Something needs to be done. If not something like Clark's proposal, then you suggest something better.

In your case since you contribute far less to the maintaining of the government shouldn't those that contribute more have their votes count more? After all that is only fair... It would be like shareholders, those that choose to not pay in, have no say, those all the way in have the ultimate decision making power.

Sorry, but if you have a good education and only make 25k a year, you are incredibly stupid in your career decision making... that is unless you are a teacher inw hich case you would be making more if the Board of Education was dissolved

Are you certain? Let me outline my roommate for you.

IT professional. OVer 10 years of experience.

Works at Best Buy in the appliance department for less money than I am making.

I guess he is stupid for his career choice then, huh?

He must be stupid. Since every day he looks for an IT job. Every time one crops up he sends out his resume. He had sent out 3 in the last 3 years. It must be his fault alone that only 3 IT jobs had openings, right?

Come on! I do not shirk my responsibilty for my position. How dare you throw away the responcibility of everyone else?

The job market is pathetic. I hear rumors it is improving, but you better get out the huge power magnifying glass to show me where.

The economy is paltry at best. And Bush is somewhat to blame. Not all his fault mind you, but the economy was improving under Clinton.

But, of course, it is only the fault of the citizen. Just because they will not go out and blow/fvck their way to a good job right?

And I am not saying that every one in a good job "sleeps" their way into it... It is the only way we can into it around here. (Near Albany, New York)

And before any dimwit suggests moving, let me point out that it takes money to move. And no, loans are not the answer. Because again, it takes money to get loans.

 

DOSfan

Senior member
Sep 19, 2003
522
0
0
Originally posted by: Shanti


Oops, I guess you were including social security and medicare taxes, not just federal income tax. So that extra 7.65% would take you up to about 16%. Remember, that's taking into account any refunds you may get back.

Yes, I can see you being upset about having 1/5th of your income taken from you.
But do you really think you should be MORE upset than those who have 1/2 of the money they earned taken away by the government?
They have a lot more to complain about than you do.
Why do you think that you shouldn't have to pay your fair share while other's should have to pay far more than their fair share?

To those who say a flat tax isn't fair, you are right. It isn't fair to those who make more money because they have to pay a larger portion of the cost of maintaining the government, while they get the same or less benefit from government services. But it's the fairest system that would actually be feasible. All of us who aren't rich should be thanking the rich for taking on such a large portion of the cost of government. If everyone had to pay an equal share, the tax rates for those making 20k a year would have to be at least 100%.

You people who claim that high paid executives just sit there and get paid to play golf and smoke cigars are fvcking idiots. These people don't get hired for these jobs by luck (well, maybe a little). They get hired and paid well because they have the talent and skills to help the company succeed. No reasonably successfull business is going to pay someone 500k a year to sit on their asses. They are going to pay them that kind of money only if they will make the company at least 500k more profitable per year. These high paid execs are the one's responsible for making sure that all the employees continue to have jobs.

Not true. Social Security and Medicare are completely seperate on my pay stubs. About 10 dolars each. (I do not have a stub in front of me at the moment.)

Nope. My quotes were for Federal Witholding alone. And yes, that does include any refunds I might get. But let me let you in on something. The biggest Federal Refund I ever recieved was a little over $300. That was the year that the IRS screwed up.

So I am not expecting much more than $400 dolars in a refund.

Go ahead and tell me I am wrong again.
 

Ornery

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,022
17
81
Originally posted by: DOSfan


Are you certain? Let me outline my roommate for you.

IT professional. OVer 10 years of experience.

Works at Best Buy in the appliance department for less money than I am making.

I guess he is stupid for his career choice then, huh?

He must be stupid. Since every day he looks for an IT job. Every time one crops up he sends out his resume. He had sent out 3 in the last 3 years. It must be his fault alone that only 3 IT jobs had openings, right?

Come on! I do not shirk my responsibilty for my position. How dare you throw away the responcibility of everyone else?

The job market is pathetic. I hear rumors it is improving, but you better get out the huge power magnifying glass to show me where.

The economy is paltry at best. And Bush is somewhat to blame. Not all his fault mind you, but the economy was improving under Clinton. :confused:

But, of course, it is only the fault of the citizen. Just because they will not go out and blow/fvck their way to a good job right?

And I am not saying that every one in a good job "sleeps" their way into it... It is the only way we can into it around here. (Near Albany, New York)

And before any dimwit suggests moving, let me point out that it takes money to move. And no, loans are not the answer. Because again, it takes money to get loans.
Time for you and your friend to shift gears. People immigrate here and start businesses, with far less than you have...

DO THE RIGHT THING by Spike Lee
  • ...COCONUT SID
    As I was saying before we were so
    rudely interrupted by the finest.

    ML
    What was you saying?

    Coconut Sid blanks.

    SWEET DICK WILLIE
    Motherfu*ker wasn't saying sh*t.

    ML
    Look at that.

    COCONUT SID
    Look at what?

    ML points across the street to the Korean fruit and vegetable
    stand.

    ML
    It's a fu*king shame.

    SWEET DICK WILLIE
    What is?




    ML
    Sweet Dick Willie.

    SWEET DICK WILLIE
    That's my name.

    ML
    Do I have to spell it out?

    COCONUT SID
    Make it plain.

    ML
    OK, but listen up. I'm gonna break
    it down.

    SWEET DICK WILLIE
    Let it be broke.

    ML
    Can ya dig it?

    SWEET DICK WILLIE
    It's dug.

    CLOSE--ML

    ML
    Look at those Korean motherfu*kers
    across the street. I betcha they
    haven't been a year off da
    motherfu*king boat before they
    opened up their own place.

    CLOSE--COCONUT SID

    COCONUT SID
    It's been about a year.

    CLOSE--ML

    ML
    A motherfu*king year off the
    motherfu*king boat and got a good
    business in our neighborhood
    occupying a building that had been
    boarded up for longer than I care
    to remember and I've been here a
    long time.

    CLOSE--SWEET DICK WILLIE

    SWEET DICK WILLIE
    It has been a long time.




    CLOSE--COCONUT SID

    COCONUT SID
    How long?

    CLOSE--ML

    ML
    Too long! Too long. Now for the
    life of me, I haven't been able to
    figger this out. Either dem
    Koreans are geniuses or we Blacks
    are dumb.

    This is truly a stupefying question and all three are silent.
    What is the answer?

    COCONUT SID
    It's gotta be cuz we're Black. No
    other explanation, nobody don't
    want the Black man to be about sh*t.

    SWEET DICK WILLIE
    Old excuse.

    ML
    I'll be one happy fool to see us
    have our own business right here.
    Yes, sir. I'd be the first in line
    to spend the little money I got.

    Sweet Dick Willie gets up from his folding chair.

    SWEET DICK WILLIE
    It's Miller time. Let me go give
    these Koreans s'more business.

    ML
    It's a motherfu*king shame.

    COCONUT SID
    Ain't that a bitch...
I bought my first computer parts in1992 from a guy who immigrated from... ? He was Palestinian. He now hires people to work at the store. I'm not sure if he puts many hours in there or not.
 

Askalon

Golden Member
Dec 18, 1999
1,637
0
0
Originally posted by: slag
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: slag
it sucks for those wealthy people who have worked hard for their money, but it helps redistribute wealth and will aid in recreating the middle income class. As it is, we are spiraling towards a lower income class and an upper income class, with middle income generally dropping to lower income.

tax breaks for those who are having a hard time making ends meet seems to make sense to me.

Tell me this. Why is unemployment taxed? Obviously you need all the money you can get since you are unemployed so why can the govt tax this money? Hey, you are out of a job, lets tax you!!!

Wrong. Across the board tax cuts stimulate a middle income class. Employers have more money to pay the employees, and the employees get to keep more of their paycheck. By wiping out taxes up to a higher range within the lower income class, you're just widening the lower income class. Once people reach the line between non-tax and skyrocketed-taxes, they're either going to work that extra for nothing or intentionally fall back to stay under. Less people are going to strive for the high income class. The high income class might be hurt to the point that their business fails, or they will move the entire business to another country. Or their business will simply not grow.

It has been said over and over - we need a flat percentage tax. It is the most fair tax possible. If you're only making 20k a year, and you pay 10% tax, then you pay 2k in taxes. If you're making 500k a year, and you pay 10% tax, then you pay 50k in taxes. The person making 20k is paying less taxes than the person making 500k, but proportionally. When you take the increasing taxes out of the picture, it is a level playing field for all laborers. The more effort you put into working, the more you rise in the ranks, the more you get paid, no penalties.

Oh and about the unemployment - the person getting the unemployment compensation check isn't the one getting taxes. The people paying into the unemployment compensation fund are getting taxed. UC should be privatized into Unemployment Insurance that people can elect to put a small percentage of their check into. Then we can avoid the inefficient beurocracy of the government taxing their own social program.

Incorrect about the last part. My neighbor is currently unemployed and taxes are taken out of his unemployment check. Money coming to him that he earned (he paid into unemployment while he was employed) is taken out of his check. He is taxed on his unemployment check.


This is very true. In Iowa at least you can elect to either have taxes pulled from each check or not. Then when you do your taxes, you get to put in how much you got off unemployment and pay the approiate amount.

Why? because that money is put in pre-tax (or it is put in by the company you work for, I really do not recall at the moment). Once taken out it becomes income, thus subject to tax. My thought is that this money should follow you from job to job (I guess it doesn't or something really stupid) then whatever you have left in when you retire, you get it all.


As far as never seeing 100K I doubt if I would on my own income, but coupled with a spouse(s) it could.
I just bought a house for $145K
My payments are $1200 a month.
30 year loan

A person who lives in a different area may be subject to higher or lower payments depending on thier % and other factors such as lentgh of loan, PMI, Insurance, Property taxes, and whatever else the bank, couty, state and fed's want to add on.


Originally posted by: Ornery
Working their butts off earning Mr. X's money? :confused:

Mr. A or shareholders negotiated Mr. X's salery before they hired him. If they were smart enough to hire a guy like Lee Iacocca, those 500 Mr. Y's can thank him for making their company profitable, so they still have jobs. What exactly is a guy like that worth?

You want to tax the piss out of people who create businesses and jobs. WTF would I want to start a business if you're going to lay claim to such a huge chunk of my profit? Ain't really worth the trouble IMO. With unemployment so high, we need a helluva lot more people like Mr. A and Mr. X, than Mr. Y.


Interesting thought. I worked for Worldcom aka MCI from 2000-2003. I was able to survive a long time but the last round of layoff's (that I know of on August 28, 2003) I was let go.

I think what everyone has forgotten is that a comapny is made to make money for it's owners. They in turn share that with the employee's (if your lucky). When I worked for MCI, 2001 & 2002 there were no raises or cost of living increases. It sucked, but I was making more money than ever at the time.

As far as the OP. I don't give a damn. I have found that no matter what you get promised on the campaign trail, about 99% of it is just BS so they can get elected to a $200,000 per year job.


And wtf was the point of that last post? Blacks are stupid? koreans are rich? or your just racist and stupid?
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
13
81
Originally posted by: Raiden256
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve

I agree. What was Steve Forbes' (I think it was him) flat tax plan? First $30, 000.00 is tax free, after that a flat tax of 17%? The rich would still pay more in taxes, since they have more money to pay the 17% on. I am not one of those that believes the wealthy ought to be penalized simply because they have more money.

I'm not a flat tax proponent (it's called a moral imperative, people), but this is the only way that you can call a flat tax fair.

The fact is that a flat tax across the board with no exceptions is absolutely not fair to those making small amounts of money (peri-poverty line levels). If you're making $20k a year, a 20% flat tax knocks $4k off your available income, bringing you down to $16k a year, which is considerably harder to live on. (Not that $20k was easy, mind you... I've been there) Meanwhile, someone making $1e6 a year gets $200k knocked off, bringing them to $800k a year, which is not *meaningfully* harder to live on. Those that make the most within this hypothetical tax system are impacted (in terms of quality of life) the least by the tax, and vice versa, which makes it inherently unfair. Fairness would imply that all parties are impacted equally.

So to make it fair, you would choose to reduce the quality of life of the rich folk, down to the level of the poor folk? Sounds about right for a lefty... similar to the left-wing education plan (Test scores are low, so we'll just lower the standards!)

 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,466
3
76
Originally posted by: DOSfan
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: DOSfan
Originally posted by: Rob9874
Originally posted by: ThaPerculator

Because the dude that physically busts his arse all day will never see $100k....

Sounds like good incentive to get an education. I'm sick of the victim mentality that says, I'm going to choose to make poor decisions in life so I have to work hard for no pay, and I want society to feel sorry for me.

Lets see...

1) I have an education.
2) I do not have the victim mentality.
3) I have not made "poor" decisions. (I have made some bad ones, but not as a habit.)
4) I do not care if society feels sorry for me or not.

And I make... About $25,000 a year.

And guess what? This is almost 100% more than I made last year. (Which is about 50% more than I have ever made in a year.)

So, I guess it is all my fault then?

So when I get my paycheck, and I have 20% taken out just in Federal Taxes alone I shouldn't get upset?

Let's face it. You will not agree with me, and I sure as hell won't agree with you. But the system as is, isn't worth a damn. Something needs to be done. If not something like Clark's proposal, then you suggest something better.

In your case since you contribute far less to the maintaining of the government shouldn't those that contribute more have their votes count more? After all that is only fair... It would be like shareholders, those that choose to not pay in, have no say, those all the way in have the ultimate decision making power.

Sorry, but if you have a good education and only make 25k a year, you are incredibly stupid in your career decision making... that is unless you are a teacher inw hich case you would be making more if the Board of Education was dissolved

Are you certain? Let me outline my roommate for you.

IT professional. OVer 10 years of experience.

Works at Best Buy in the appliance department for less money than I am making.

I guess he is stupid for his career choice then, huh?

He must be stupid. Since every day he looks for an IT job. Every time one crops up he sends out his resume. He had sent out 3 in the last 3 years. It must be his fault alone that only 3 IT jobs had openings, right?

Come on! I do not shirk my responsibilty for my position. How dare you throw away the responcibility of everyone else?

The job market is pathetic. I hear rumors it is improving, but you better get out the huge power magnifying glass to show me where.

The economy is paltry at best. And Bush is somewhat to blame. Not all his fault mind you, but the economy was improving under Clinton.

But, of course, it is only the fault of the citizen. Just because they will not go out and blow/fvck their way to a good job right?

And I am not saying that every one in a good job "sleeps" their way into it... It is the only way we can into it around here. (Near Albany, New York)

And before any dimwit suggests moving, let me point out that it takes money to move. And no, loans are not the answer. Because again, it takes money to get loans.

7 years ago I was driving a forklift for a living making less than 10 bucks an hour. I decided that I needed a change and moved into a larger city (4 million people) did data entry for 12 an hour and completed most of the MCSE exams by doing self study. I took a job building computers for about the same amount of pay and finished off the remainder exams. I did desktop support for a year. I did software testing for a half year and now am doing software support for a Fortune 50 company(3+ years). All this without a college degree(finished that up last year). I did my time on the low rungs.

Your roommate is stupid. I had no idea that the entire US had only 3 job openings last year. If Albany is not hiring then Rochester, Boston or somewhere else is. You are not married to a city, industry or locality. You mentioned that he has 10 years of IT experience...My cousin has 10 years of experience and his only work experience is at Target and a grocery store. It's all about skills and diversity. I feel 0 sympathy to the Java coders that lost their 6 figure job because their job was outsourced and they don't know anything else. You always have to have something to fall back on.
 

DT4K

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2002
6,944
3
81
Originally posted by: DOSfan
Originally posted by: Shanti


Oops, I guess you were including social security and medicare taxes, not just federal income tax. So that extra 7.65% would take you up to about 16%. Remember, that's taking into account any refunds you may get back.

Yes, I can see you being upset about having 1/5th of your income taken from you.
But do you really think you should be MORE upset than those who have 1/2 of the money they earned taken away by the government?
They have a lot more to complain about than you do.
Why do you think that you shouldn't have to pay your fair share while other's should have to pay far more than their fair share?

To those who say a flat tax isn't fair, you are right. It isn't fair to those who make more money because they have to pay a larger portion of the cost of maintaining the government, while they get the same or less benefit from government services. But it's the fairest system that would actually be feasible. All of us who aren't rich should be thanking the rich for taking on such a large portion of the cost of government. If everyone had to pay an equal share, the tax rates for those making 20k a year would have to be at least 100%.

You people who claim that high paid executives just sit there and get paid to play golf and smoke cigars are fvcking idiots. These people don't get hired for these jobs by luck (well, maybe a little). They get hired and paid well because they have the talent and skills to help the company succeed. No reasonably successfull business is going to pay someone 500k a year to sit on their asses. They are going to pay them that kind of money only if they will make the company at least 500k more profitable per year. These high paid execs are the one's responsible for making sure that all the employees continue to have jobs.

Not true. Social Security and Medicare are completely seperate on my pay stubs. About 10 dolars each. (I do not have a stub in front of me at the moment.)

Nope. My quotes were for Federal Witholding alone. And yes, that does include any refunds I might get. But let me let you in on something. The biggest Federal Refund I ever recieved was a little over $300. That was the year that the IRS screwed up.

So I am not expecting much more than $400 dolars in a refund.

Go ahead and tell me I am wrong again.

I don't know what you are doing wrong, but if you are paying 20% of your income to the government in federal income tax when you only make 25k, then you sure as hell are doing something wrong.
The tax rate for your income should be around 15%. And there is what, a 7,000 standard deduction?
So you should be paying roughly 15% of around 18k. If you are paying 5k a year in federal income tax, you might want to brush up on your math skills before doing your next tax return or hire somebody who knows what they are doing.

And if your roommate can only find 3 job openings in IT in 3 years, then he is a fvcking moron.
I can look online right now and find at least 20,000 openings.
Even in my state, which has one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation, I can find at least a hundred job openings RIGHT NOW that I might be loosely qualified for.
I graduated with my CS degree 2.5 years ago from a school that certainly does not have a high reputation for CS or any other field (Southern Oregon University).
I had ZERO work experience in this field at that time. I was hired straight out of school during the supposed worst time for IT people. I do mostly VB.Net, ASP.Net, SQL Server development and I make 50k a year with a company that is not doing particularly well.

I've had several contacts with recruiters who were looking for people to do VB/SQL programming in the Portland area among others. The jobs they were reruiting for paid only slightly less. (Around 45k).
 

Your roommate is stupid. I had no idea that the entire US had only 3 job openings last year. If Albany is not hiring then Rochester, Boston or somewhere else is. You are not married to a city, industry or locality. You mentioned that he has 10 years of IT experience...My cousin has 10 years of experience and his only work experience is at Target and a grocery store. It's all about skills and diversity. I feel 0 sympathy to the Java coders that lost their 6 figure job because their job was outsourced and they don't know anything else. You always have to have something to fall back on.
So your fall back is forklift driving then?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,305
136
Rush - "The Trees"

There is unrest in the forest,
There is trouble with the trees,
For the maples want more sunlight
And the oaks ignore their pleas.

The trouble with the maples,
(And they're quite convinced they're right)
They say the oaks are just too lofty
And they grab up all the light.
But the oaks can't help their feelings
If they like the way they're made.
And they wonder why the maples
Can't be happy in their shade.

There is trouble in the forest,
And the creatures all have fled,
As the maples scream "Oppression!"
And the oaks just shake their heads.

So the maples formed a union
And demanded equal rights.
"The oaks are just too greedy;
We will make them give us light."
Now there's no more oak oppression,
For they passed a noble law,
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe, and saw.
 

Ornery

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,022
17
81
"And wtf was the point of that last post? Blacks are stupid? koreans are rich? or your just racist and stupid? "

Yeah, Spike Lee wrote a movie about how stupid blacks are, etc. He is a racist after all...
rolleye.gif


The point is, as I mentioned in the post, that immigrants with less education, contacts and money, come over here and start up businesses. If they can do it, surely somebody with an education, family and friends to fall back on, and access to money, can at least get a decent job, let alone start their own business.

If you're so pissed off about "the man" keeping you down, and pocketing money from all your labor, than goddamit, start your own fvcking business!
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,145
10
81
Originally posted by: DOSfan[/b
Are you certain? Let me outline my roommate for you.

IT professional. OVer 10 years of experience.

Works at Best Buy in the appliance department for less money than I am making.

I guess he is stupid for his career choice then, huh?

He must be stupid. Since every day he looks for an IT job. Every time one crops up he sends out his resume. He had sent out 3 in the last 3 years. It must be his fault alone that only 3 IT jobs had openings, right?

Come on! I do not shirk my responsibilty for my position. How dare you throw away the responcibility of everyone else?

The job market is pathetic. I hear rumors it is improving, but you better get out the huge power magnifying glass to show me where.

The economy is paltry at best. And Bush is somewhat to blame. Not all his fault mind you, but the economy was improving under Clinton.

But, of course, it is only the fault of the citizen. Just because they will not go out and blow/fvck their way to a good job right?

And I am not saying that every one in a good job "sleeps" their way into it... It is the only way we can into it around here. (Near Albany, New York)

And before any dimwit suggests moving, let me point out that it takes money to move. And no, loans are not the answer. Because again, it takes money to get loans.



hmm i have been in IT for the last 13 years myself. while it is hard to find a job it is not impossible. A buddy of mine has been laid off a few times but always finds a job within 3 months. granted he had to move out of state the last time.

If your room mate has only sent out 3 resumes in the last year he needs to do a better job of looking. When i was laid off a few years ago i was sending out at least 2 resumes a day. Oh and i can guarantee that there are more then 3 IT job openings in the last year. if you are going to argue at least be realistic.

if you cant save enough to move then you really have problems. you can rent a u-haul truck for cheap and saving 2k to get an apartment ain't that hard.

if you put in as much effort to find a job as you do in complaining about getting one i bet you would be employed.
 
May 31, 2001
15,326
1
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Rush - "The Trees"

There is unrest in the forest,
There is trouble with the trees,
For the maples want more sunlight
And the oaks ignore their pleas.

The trouble with the maples,
(And they're quite convinced they're right)
They say the oaks are just too lofty
And they grab up all the light.
But the oaks can't help their feelings
If they like the way they're made.
And they wonder why the maples
Can't be happy in their shade.

There is trouble in the forest,
And the creatures all have fled,
As the maples scream "Oppression!"
And the oaks just shake their heads.

So the maples formed a union
And demanded equal rights.
"The oaks are just too greedy;
We will make them give us light."
Now there's no more oak oppression,
For they passed a noble law,
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe, and saw.

That's what many seem to want. Easier to drag someone down to your level than put forth the effort to work your way up to theirs. A lot of people in this thread ought to go rent Harrison Bergeron. "All men are not created equal. It is the purpose of the Government to make them so."
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,100
5,640
126
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: Vic
Rush - "The Trees"

There is unrest in the forest,
There is trouble with the trees,
For the maples want more sunlight
And the oaks ignore their pleas.

The trouble with the maples,
(And they're quite convinced they're right)
They say the oaks are just too lofty
And they grab up all the light.
But the oaks can't help their feelings
If they like the way they're made.
And they wonder why the maples
Can't be happy in their shade.

There is trouble in the forest,
And the creatures all have fled,
As the maples scream "Oppression!"
And the oaks just shake their heads.

So the maples formed a union
And demanded equal rights.
"The oaks are just too greedy;
We will make them give us light."
Now there's no more oak oppression,
For they passed a noble law,
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe, and saw.

That's what many seem to want. Easier to drag someone down to your level than put forth the effort to work your way up to theirs. A lot of people in this thread ought to go rent Harrison Bergeron. "All men are not created equal. It is the purpose of the Government to make them so."

No one has suggested dragging the rich down. Many have suggested that the rich are or will be dragged down though. Poppycock!
 

DOSfan

Senior member
Sep 19, 2003
522
0
0
Originally posted by: Shanti


I don't know what you are doing wrong, but if you are paying 20% of your income to the government in federal income tax when you only make 25k, then you sure as hell are doing something wrong.
The tax rate for your income should be around 15%. And there is what, a 7,000 standard deduction?
So you should be paying roughly 15% of around 18k. If you are paying 5k a year in federal income tax, you might want to brush up on your math skills before doing your next tax return or hire somebody who knows what they are doing.


And if your roommate can only find 3 job openings in IT in 3 years, then he is a fvcking moron.
I can look online right now and find at least 20,000 openings.
Even in my state, which has one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation, I can find at least a hundred job openings RIGHT NOW that I might be loosely qualified for.
I graduated with my CS degree 2.5 years ago from a school that certainly does not have a high reputation for CS or any other field (Southern Oregon University).
I had ZERO work experience in this field at that time. I was hired straight out of school during the supposed worst time for IT people. I do mostly VB.Net, ASP.Net, SQL Server development and I make 50k a year with a company that is not doing particularly well.

I've had several contacts with recruiters who were looking for people to do VB/SQL programming in the Portland area among others. The jobs they were reruiting for paid only slightly less. (Around 45k).

Ahhhh.... Yes. It must be me that is stupid. Doesn't matter that I earned 14 college credits before I graduated high school. Doesn't matter that over half of those were in Math. Nooooo.......

The problem is, I do not live in the fantasy that is "how it is supposed to be." I live in the reality of "what is."

I do not give a rats ass how it is supposed to be. I can tell you how it is though.

Originally posted by: Nitemare


7 years ago I was driving a forklift for a living making less than 10 bucks an hour. I decided that I needed a change and moved into a larger city (4 million people) did data entry for 12 an hour and completed most of the MCSE exams by doing self study. I took a job building computers for about the same amount of pay and finished off the remainder exams. I did desktop support for a year. I did software testing for a half year and now am doing software support for a Fortune 50 company(3+ years). All this without a college degree(finished that up last year). I did my time on the low rungs.

Your roommate is stupid. I had no idea that the entire US had only 3 job openings last year. If Albany is not hiring then Rochester, Boston or somewhere else is. You are not married to a city, industry or locality. You mentioned that he has 10 years of IT experience...My cousin has 10 years of experience and his only work experience is at Target and a grocery store. It's all about skills and diversity. I feel 0 sympathy to the Java coders that lost their 6 figure job because their job was outsourced and they don't know anything else. You always have to have something to fall back on.

I admit it. I am caught again. (Sort of.) I did not look over my roommates shoulders as he did his job search/resume sending.

I only know of what he told me.

Yes, he could have lied to me.

The three job postings he told me about =

1) Overseas. Would make less than he was making here. And was only a 6 month contract. Company would not pay for the living expenses. = Not worth it.
2) a 100 mile commute (one way) for a little more than he was making driving a cab. After you take into account the travel expenses and wear and tear = not worth it.
3) The best of the lot. He really wanted this job. Requirement: Top Secret Security. Any clue how easy it is for a civilian to acquire Top Secret? (Even one that was in the military and had some level of security clearance?)

So that is all I had to go on.

And as far as my education:

Associates Electronic Engineering Technology
Associates Automative Mechanics (Gained in that order)

You know what? I do not work in either field!

I am a production worker. Basically skilled laborer. Okay, highly skilled.

Best job I ever had. I do not work as hard as I have on any other job, and I get paid more.

So, please, please, pretty please - anyone - tell me just how stupid I am again. 'Cause I really believe you. :disgust:

Originally posted by: waggy

hmm i have been in IT for the last 13 years myself. while it is hard to find a job it is not impossible. A buddy of mine has been laid off a few times but always finds a job within 3 months. granted he had to move out of state the last time.

If your room mate has only sent out 3 resumes in the last year he needs to do a better job of looking. When i was laid off a few years ago i was sending out at least 2 resumes a day. Oh and i can guarantee that there are more then 3 IT job openings in the last year. if you are going to argue at least be realistic.

if you cant save enough to move then you really have problems. you can rent a u-haul truck for cheap and saving 2k to get an apartment ain't that hard.

if you put in as much effort to find a job as you do in complaining about getting one i bet you would be employed.

Holy FVCK!! Now I am unemployed? Hahahahahaha!!!! If you put half as much effort into actually reading what you are replying to, as you do making points against me, you just might make sense.

And it ain't hard to save 3K? (Give or take the U Haul renting in your example.) What planet do you live on? I am used to living on 6-8K a year. After you take out taxes, bills, and food expenses..... Where do you have anything left?

I only started making 12K two years ago. If you are truelly interested in my well being, I will even share with you what I make this (last) year when I recieve my W2.
 

Rob9874

Diamond Member
Nov 7, 1999
3,314
1
0
Originally posted by: DOSfan

Oh well, you will just have to trust me on this.

My gross weekly pay is about $500. That is assuming, of course, that I do not work the 8-10 hours overtime a week that my supervisers would like all of their employess to do. My weekly Federal Withholding is around $90 a week. Okay, you got me. I rounded a bit. It is a little less than 20%. But no where near 9%.

I don't think you're making anything up, but I think you are paying way too much in Federal Taxes, and should expect a nice refund. Accoring to the 2003 Tax Brackets (which can be found here), you will be taxed 10% on the first $7000 you make ($700), and 15% on the other $18,000 ($2700). So you should pay a total of $3400 in taxes. If you paid $5000, expect a $1600 refund. Actually more, because I didn't take your standard deduction into account. So your taxable income is even less than $25,000.
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,466
3
76
Originally posted by: SampSon
Your roommate is stupid. I had no idea that the entire US had only 3 job openings last year. If Albany is not hiring then Rochester, Boston or somewhere else is. You are not married to a city, industry or locality. You mentioned that he has 10 years of IT experience...My cousin has 10 years of experience and his only work experience is at Target and a grocery store. It's all about skills and diversity. I feel 0 sympathy to the Java coders that lost their 6 figure job because their job was outsourced and they don't know anything else. You always have to have something to fall back on.
So your fall back is forklift driving then?

Programming, hardware, component level work, networking, administration, pc repair, electrician...and if all else fails then there is always forklift driving