Do you think we need the IRS?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Do you think we need the IRS?

  • Yes, the serve a purpose

  • No, they are just wasting our money

  • Undecided


Results are only viewable after voting.

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Dreams, nothing but dreams. The IRS is here to stay and will grow larger and more powerful. It's an enforcement arm of the government.

Making government smaller is not something that benefits politicians and they make the rules.
This.

Besides, we must have some mechanism of raising federal capital, else Mexico or Canada could simply annex us. (Okay, maybe Canada couldn't, but still.) I would however greatly prefer something like the FairTax, or a combination of sales tax and tariffs, to such a large, powerful organization.
 

Lithium381

Lifer
May 12, 2001
12,452
2
0
At the very least simplify the personal income tax scheme! 10 brackets and a limit of 100 deductions if which 70% or more of the population must qualify to receive; ie no breaks just for the super rich. Make the postcard tax return a reality for individuals.

Save everyonr 10 hours and $150 a year! That would save the irs quite a bit of time!
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Congress writes as many stupid tax laws as they can to benefit different groups so we will hate each other. The IRS just try to administer the laws and collect money. We dont really need higher taxes we just need fewer giftwrapped credits and benefits to help some segment of the population that the elected Facists are trying to bribe. Farmers, Foodstamps, single parents, Senior Citizens, home owners, wall-street, working poor, solar panels, electric cars, tobacco, electric companies, tax abatements, political contributions, Donations, tax exempt, welfare, energy savings, retirement, investments. Got so many freebees that no one really pays taxes at the tax rate.
 

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Jesus, man - if you're going to a offer a poll, then take the time to spell it correctly...
 

Pr0d1gy

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2005
7,774
0
76
Dreams, nothing but dreams. The IRS is here to stay and will grow larger and more powerful. It's an enforcement arm of the government.

Making government smaller is not something that benefits politicians and they make the rules.

One of you actually gets what is going on. Boomerang you might be the smartest person in this forum. It's nice to know you, sir.
 

HendrixFan

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2001
4,646
0
71
Blaming the IRS instead of Congress for the fucked up mess that is the U.S. tax system is stupid. The IRS just administers what's in the Tax Code. Thinking they're at fault is like blaming the hospital billing department for sending you an invoice after a physician provides unnecessary treatment.

Absolutely.

I can only conclude that "IRS" is a term being used here for the tax code and not referring specifically to the administration that processes tax claims.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Absolutely not, we don't need a politically controlled behemoth government institution with vast expansive powers. In order to get rid of it though, we'd first need to fix the tax code, it should be vastly simplified and not be used for social engineering, rewarding cronies/lobbyists, welfare etc.
 

Elfear

Diamond Member
May 30, 2004
7,163
819
126
No, We don't need the IRS. They are a massive waste of money and they have shown that they can't be trusted.

And trust citizens and corporations alike to send in their tax obligations on their own? I'm sure everyone will adhere to the honor system. :hmm:
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,967
140
106
go to a flat tax or similar and you can greatly reduce their foot print and strangle hold.
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
Since the income tax is internal revenue, the Internal Revenue Service appears necessary.

If we switched to a purely external revenue system (like tariffs) or simply abolished the taxation power of the U.S. govt, then it wouldn't appear necessary.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
And trust citizens and corporations alike to send in their tax obligations on their own? I'm sure everyone will adhere to the honor system. :hmm:

We do need AN internal revenue service, but not the political inefficient behemoth we have now. We need a vastly stripped down version, but that can only happen if we create a new streamlined tax code.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Something like a flat tax seems like a good idea. The problem is no one wants to give up their favorite deductions and credit. However if we approached this from a different direction it might work better. Romney had some Ideas that we could just start to limit what the higher-end tax payers were allowed to itemize. I might approach this from an even simpler approach and just look at the income and start by just saying everyone that makes over 250k gets no exemptions or credits. After you get to a certain income level you should not need any help from the government for anything. No handouts for rich people.

If we just fased out some of the deductions over time it might work better like that. The hatchet method may be a little too much. Like the real estate deductions for interest and real estate taxes could be fased out or reduced by 1/10th every year till it gets to zero. Same for Business deductions and tax abatements. I think the problem with O'Bammacare was that it is too much all at once and it is just not well thought out.

Some of my reasoning is that some of the biggest deductions on taxes is for people who own houses that are really expensive. In other words it benefits the rich more than the poor. Some of these laws were written for times when houses costed a lot less. It is time to modernize how we look at things.
 
Last edited:

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
It could also be possible to have a hybrid system that is part consumption tax and part income tax. I also had some ideas for a Wall-Street transaction tax.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
I think we should also change how we tax Gasoline. Cars should have weight classes and the tax should also be based on the Weight and milage. The object should be to pay for road maintenance. Heavier vehicles damage the roadway more. If you buy a compact car lower tax if you buy a heavier car like a giant SUV you pay more.
 
Last edited:

Ketchup

Elite Member
Sep 1, 2002
14,559
248
106
I think we should also change how we tax Gasoline. Cars should have weight classes and the tax should also be based on the Weight and milage. The object should be to pay for road maintenance. Heavier vehicles damage the roadway more. If you buy a compact car lower tax if you buy a heavier car like a giant SUV you pay more.

I guess one could argue that the mileage of said heavier vehicles takes care of themselves, but your point is understood. I just think enforcement of such a thing would be costly if not impossible.
 

Elfear

Diamond Member
May 30, 2004
7,163
819
126
We do need AN internal revenue service, but not the political inefficient behemoth we have now. We need a vastly stripped down version, but that can only happen if we create a new streamlined tax code.

I agree with you there. I was just pointing out that we do need some kind of tax collection agency.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,673
12,004
136
Blaming the IRS instead of Congress for the fucked up mess that is the U.S. tax system is stupid. The IRS just administers what's in the Tax Code. Thinking they're at fault is like blaming the hospital billing department for sending you an invoice after a physician provides unnecessary treatment.

I don't get the attacks on the IRS these days. They are only carrying out the laws that were written by congress.

More libertard musings of a fantasy society that exists solely in their libertopia minds.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Do we need the IRS? No way. The IRS is corrupt and out of control and they change the the tax code without oversight much of the time.

Do we need some group charged with collecting taxes? Sure, I doubt anyone would argue against this. We need an organization with strict limitations which is NOT autonomous.

The IRS is "NOT autonomous". The IRS is under the Treasury Dept. The Treas is under the President (Obama in this case).

Also, the Constitution places the power to tax/raise revenue soley with Congress. I.e., Congress tells the IRS what our tax laws are. The IRS cannot make them up. Additionally, the judicial system lords over the IRS.

Fern
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
I don't get the attacks on the IRS these days. They are only carrying out the laws that were written by congress.

More libertard musings of a fantasy society that exists solely in their libertopia minds.

The US was built on Libertarianism.