CalebRockeT
Golden Member
Wat
Yea. But dis you know that eating 1-2 bananas can have the same effect on your blood glucose as that Snickers bar. Actually, the 1-2 bananas will be worse.
I strongly agree with you on the utter nonsense that two bananas are worse then a single Snickers bar.I'm not gonna trust some random wacko on YouTube. Bananas also contain fiber, along with potassium and other nutrients. Candy bars... don't. It's crap like this that make people think it's OK to eat a Snickers instead of an apple.
I'm not gonna trust some random wacko on YouTube. Bananas also contain fiber, along with potassium and other nutrients. Candy bars... don't. It's crap like this that make people think it's OK to eat a Snickers instead of an apple.
Yes, too much sugar is bad. No we should not ban it. Yes we should educate people more. No it is not the devil.
Everything converts to sugar in the body. In certain cases, straight doses of sugar are absolutely necessary. The health effects of sugar with molecules removed (eg Splenda, Extra, etc) as well as alternative sweeteners such as stevia, monkfruit, etc are unknown over long duration of time and not necessarily the way we want to swing for sweetening all foods.
People need to take ownership of their actions, they don't need to be forced down our throats.
I heard about this too, not sure how true it is. I'd like to think it's not because it's one of my favourite fruit and I think I'm being healthy by eating one. I think this is yet one of those things with health where we're not sure what to believe. I'd like to think that because it's natural and not processed it's good for you, then again potatoes are natural and arn't considered healthy so I guess Bananas could be in the same category. Some mushrooms can kill you if you eat them so just because it's natural does not mean it's healthy I guess.
Don't know why you wouldn't trust his glucose scores. Did you watch the video? He took his blood test when he ate the snickers, 30m, 1hr, 1.5hr, and 2hrs. Same with the 2 bananas. The outcome wasn't good fot the fruit. It's right there on his glucose reading. I guess you could replicate the same thing if you thought he might had lied about the results. I don't know why he woud since anyone could replicate the same test.
Dude, you are hell of impressive. I'm copying this entire post into my personal data... MACROS! Gonna check it out!Ownership is a tricky thing, for a few reasons:
1. People lack the correct education to take the proper action (there is a tremendous amount of haze & misinformation in the world of nutrition)
2. Because of that, and because of their prior experience, it can feel overwhelming or difficult or impossible to change, or to even want to change
3. A lot of people simply choose not to care
My own history is pretty simple. I've been overweight twice in my life:
1. I grew up super skinny & could eat whatever I wanted whenever I wanted
2. Got married, got an office job, gained like 50 pounds
3. Went on a clean-eating diet & lost the weight, but had no idea what I was doing
4. It wasn't really sustainable, so I gained weight again over time
5. Then I learned about macros, learned how to control my bodyfat & my muscles, and have lived happily ever after ever since
For me, eating against my macros every day has a lot of benefits:
1. No dietary restrictions (yay IIFYM!), so it wasn't so much of a lifestyle change in terms of what I was eating, as much as a workflow change in learning to count the macros in the foods I ate. It was super annoying for awhile, but as I mostly eat homemade food at this point, I just used a meal macros calculator to add the numbers to all of my recipes. From there, it's just a simple matter of playing Food Tetris every day to split up my numbers! I mostly operate out of my freezer using meal-prep meals (with labels), so it's generally pretty easy!
2. I love sugar & have dessert pretty much every single day. It's not so much about willpower-based moderation, as much as just seeing what I can fit into my macros for the day. A plain baked potato is 37 grams of carbs. A 12-ounce Sprite is 38 grams of carbs. A single Olive Garden breadstick is 25 grams of carbs. Throw in some pasta, desserts, etc. and you could easily be taking in 200 grams of carbs at every meal all day long. A 500+ grams of carbs day is normal for a lot of people. Self-induced diabetes doesn't care about simple or complex carbs, good or bad carbs, or net carbs, it only cares about the sugar intake into your body over the long-term. Given that 50% of Americans are now diabetic in some form (pre-diabetic, Type II, etc.) & given how many ready-to-go food products are laced with high quantities of carbs, it's super easy to overdose on it & screw up your sugar tolerance, especially if you're not paying attention to it over the years.
3. I can precisely control my results. Losing fat, gaining muscle, getting to a certain bodyfat percentage is simply a matter of time with macros, not willpower. There are no questions marks...it's just three simple numbers. The more strict you are, the better & faster results you'll get over time! Before, this was a complete fog. When I first tackled my weight problem about ten years ago, I ate a lot of plain chicken, broccoli, brown rice, whole-wheat bread, etc. Had zero knowledge of calories, macros, etc. - I just knew that I'd somehow gained a lot of weight & wanted to get it off. It was not enjoyable to do & I didn't understand the underlying operational principles involved with weight-loss. Macros turned out to give me such great results & be so easy that I've just stuck with it long-term. I'm not always super-strict with it & have plenty of untracked days, but I know exactly how to get results if & when I want them now, and generally eat according to my macros out of convenience (and for high energy levels!).
4. I grew to become a somewhat lazy eater (pre-macros) & would often run out the door without breakfast and/or work through lunch. I've come to discover that I get hungry every few hours, so I typically do 7 meals & snacks a day (morning snack, breakfast, brunch snack, lunch, afternoon snack, dinner, dessert). I typically don't do large meals because they make me sleepy. Dealing with this situation by creating a meal-prep system has worked wonders for me...no more arguments about "what's for dinner?" or having to figure things out food every day from "zero" (i.e. no plan for cooking or getting take-out or whatever). So macros pretty much forces me to do meal-prep so that I'm not having to do math gymnastics in my head every day, lol.
5. Some people restrict how much they eat, or what they eat, which is fine, if that works for them. However, my own personal willpower isn't exactly super reliable, haha. The thing that's worked the best for me is eating prepared foods against my macros every day, rather than winging it on a daily basis and/or ignoring my personal macronutrient guidelines per my current weight loss/maintenance/gain goals. Basically, following macros & doing meal-prep makes eating easy, and you can program in as much deliciousness as you want into your day through homemade food, packaged foods, take-out, and dine-in meals.
TL;DR: It all boils down to personal desire. If you want to get in shape & control your health, then you'll do it. If you do it, you'll eventually find the underlying operational principles of the human body's GI tract, in relation to bodyfat & energy levels. There are multiple barriers along the way (self-confidence, education on how things really work, preparation vs. willpower, and so on), but if you really want something, then you'll stick with it & be persistent & chip away on it until you learn what you need to learn & do what you need to do to get the results you want.
"Caveat emptor" applies to sugar just as much as anything else...it's your body, you have the choice about what to put into it every day, and you know that sugar can be addictive, so it's up to everyone on a personal basis to create the right dietary inputs for themselves. I enjoy Snickers bars from time to time, but I don't eat a whole box of them at once & exceed my calories & macros for the day, every day. It's not the job of the Snickers manufacturer to control the end-user usage of the product, even though they know they have an addictive product.
It can be a difficult thing to accept, because half our nation is suffering from some form of diabetes, which makes it an honest public health crisis, but I'd say that if anyone was going to tackle it, the government should release a guide like my macros tutorial linked above, rather than the crummy food pyramid. Then you can make educated decisions about whether you want to continue to have an unchecked super-high-carb diet, knowing full well how things work & what the consequences are, instead of the general public perception we have now of "I should probably cut back, but I'm not going to" - which happens because people don't have a clear knowledge of how things work & why, so their brains blow a mental fuse & wants to quit dealing with it (at least, that's what mine did for a long time!).
MACROS! Gonna check it out!
I created a new table for the purpose and the first record is your post quoted here!
Thank you!I have some posts over there on meal-prep as well, if you're interested!
Once the idea of macros "clicks" in your head, it's SUPER easy! Technically, ALL diets are macro diets, and all diets that work are diets that offer calorie-restriction in some way. But you can eat Twinkies all day & still not be feeding your body properly, which is why you have to break it down even further to the macros level. For example, you don't really need massive amounts of protein:
![]()
The myth of 1 g/lb: Optimal protein intake for bodybuilders
Protein. It’s every bodybuilder’s favorite macronutrient and for good reason. Protein is extremely essential, super satiating and amazingly anabolic. Protein is awesome… but you’re consuming too much of it. Like most myths, the belief that you should take in 1g/lb of body weight has become so...mennohenselmans.com
And the carbs vs. fats percentages can be variable based on need, like if you need a low-carb diet for medical reasons, you can adjust your remaining calories for a higher fat level, for example. I like IIFYM because it's simple & it works. Join the Facebook group & spend an hour browsing through the posts, especially the before & after photos:
www.facebook.com
It's pretty easy to get controlled results (i.e. setup a basic timeline of how long it will take & what you need to eat) when eating according to your macros. All you have to do is start looking at your body as an external asset, like a machine. That machine has requirements, based on your goals:
1. Weight loss
2. Weight maintenance (stay where you are right now)
3. Weight gain
You can't spot-lose weight & you can't pick losing fat over muscle. You can simply lose, maintain, or gain bodyweight. Gaining muscle, for example, has more to do with eating a proper macro split & exercising, because if you eat 3,000 calories of Snickers bars a day, you're not going to get the same weight-gain results as if you were eating the proper amount of protein, carbs, and fats per day. This guy has a great channel where he eats fast-food for 30 days, and ice-cream for 30 days, etc.:
If you have a couple free hours, check out the Fathead documentary, which is kind of like a long, drawn-out discussion of CICO (calories in vs. calories out, which is the bottom line for weight management in general - whereas macros is for better health results & physical results).
Thank you!
I lost about 14 pounds from when I started playing golf again (2x/week) last April or so. I continued to work out 3x/week, but was getting more aerobic (not counting the golf, which involved walking a hilly ~5 mile course) because my gym closed and I started having to bike/skate (combo!) 5 miles each way to the gym... this about the same time I took up golf again (when the rains stopped). I'll start golfing again when the winter rains stop around here.
But my weight loss stalled about 10 weeks ago and I have gained back 3-4 pounds. With the absence of golf (I stopped playing about 10 days ago) I figure I have to either eat less or get compensating aerobic in the gym (or both). I've done aerobic in the gym before, but haven't been doing that for a few years.
So, yeah, I figure I have to do something because TBH I had only lost about 1/2 of what I wanted. I guess focusing on macros is my best bet in this!
I have a lot of quick stuff. I hardly ever devote an hour to a single meal anymore, used to do that all the time (well, very frequently!) when I was younger. Nowadays I do spend an hour or more in the kitchen preparing, but when I do that it's preparation for what can span several meals. For instance, I make a big stew that produces about 3 quarts, which I put in 3 quart containers in the fridge. I've yet to have any of that go bad and it yields me 6 or more quick meals, heated up in the microwave. It has lots and lots of veges and I throw in a pound of cut-up beef, some split peas, barley, sometimes some lentils, some powdered chicken broth, curry powder. The meat and peas/barley go in a pressure cooker and the veges I prepare in a large pan, combine all after cooling some.I don't really like having to figure out my food situation every day, both from deciding what to eat & having to figure out the macros in every meal, which is one of the big reasons I got into meal-prep. I'm also a very mood-based cook...sometimes I feel like making cookies, sometimes I don't want to lift a finger in the kitchen. Having meal-prep available means I can be a LOT more flexible when it comes to me actually having to do the work of cooking, because I have stuff prepared & ready to go! But that's for another post, haha!
@Kaido is literally a godsend for this forum and those who have no idea what they're doing, as well as dispelling the stupid myths that abound and false information that is so easily spread among the internet.
You sound quite an expert at this stuff though. Like I have no idea what a macro even is outside of computers or games lol and most of this stuff goes way over my head when I google it. Seems health is so complicated you pretty much need to spend your life studying and analyzing it to really understand it as you also need to be able to figure out what's true and what's not as there's tons of conflicting information. I've pretty much just stuck to the "everything in moderation" diet. There are some things that probably every diet or way of thinking can agree on that's bad for us like sugar and processed food, so I do my best to reduce my intake of them. But there are some diets out there like keto that eliminate entire food groups and some people say it's good but some say it's bad. And that goes for lot of diets. It seems every few years there is a diet or philosophy that becomes really popular then it dies off and then a new one comes out. Like for the longest time fat was evil, now I think it's considered less bad and it turns out it's sugar. But again it depends who you talk to. A cardiologist will probably tell you to avoid it while some internet expert might tell you that you can eat as much as you want.
And the end of the day we all die anyway.
Just read this:
That's all you need to know to get not just results but great results. There's a lot of FUD out there...you can spend your life endlessly reading & arguing about health stuff without actually setting any goals or doing any real work on yourself. Like you said, in the end, we all die anyway...the question is how you want your experience to be up until that point.
For me, I didn't really realize that my low-energy & messed-up GI tract system weren't normal. I didn't realize that waking up groggy wasn't normal. I didn't realize that my bowel movements weren't normal. Your body is literally designed to be high-energy machine non-stop, but we all put barriers in the way of achieving that on a daily basis, whether we realize it or not, whether we choose to accept it or not, and whether or not we take personal responsibility for our results & our experience or not.
Ultimately, no one is stuck in your body but you, so no one really cares & no one is going to babysit you to get the results you want. That has to be a personal decision & has to be used against a functional plan. IIFYM is the most fuctional plan I'm aware of. It gets results, it's realistic, it's flexible, and you can adapt it to basically live your food life however you want - what you want to eat, when you want to eat, etc. I spent a long time dancing around the issue of my health & weight & energy level, and a long time not really seeing things very clearly, and even when I did see things clearly, a long time not making any real changes in my life.
I wish that I knew about macros ten years ago when I started in H&F...heck, I wish I knew about it when I was a kid! I've seen it make a hugely positive change in my own life & the lives of my family members & friends, which is why I tout it so much. If you feel stuck, if your ideas about food & nutrition & health & energy are all diluted & you don't know where to go & you want better results & maybe even really awesome results, give macros a shot! And feel free to ask any questions! I'm a total nerd about this sort of stuff. I don't know everything there is to know out there, but the basics are enough to get you by & create real change in your life, if that's what your after, so imo, it's worth doing if you're feeling stuck & want more out of life!
Have you seen the work of Dr. Paul Mason? He goes against the advice of popular opinion, and is all about low carb/high fat. He has seen hundreds of over weight/low energy clients and will put them all on the keto diet with some amazing results. This is all reseached BTW. The biggest issue he says is the excessive amount of sugar in our diets. Not just added sugars, but carbs and even the so called "good carbs." It all eventually turns into gluicose and frutose which spikes blood sugar levels in people. He also says that fiber and way over rated and not we don't need nearly as much as we think. The fiber one is very interesting.
- YouTube
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.www.youtube.com
Low-carb, high-fat is a really good approach IF you're a sugar-sensitive person (hypoglycemic, pre-diabetic, diabetic Type II, diabietic Type I, PCOS, etc.) or if you just want to manage your sugar intake more carefully. Not everyone is sugar-sensitive, however.
Dr. Paul Mason has mad eit clear that it's not the saturated fat that we should worry about. But, saturated fat and carbs (sugar) is the culprit when it comes to heart disease.