I rather liked BF1's main theme, it was a really strong song that would have fit the era. BF2's sucks, though the loading music for the map is very nice, I think it's a partially remixed version of the BF1 theme. At least it's not similar to the god-forsaken music of BF:V.Originally posted by: us3rnotfound
well, one thing is consistent: fcked menu music![]()
Originally posted by: dudeman007
I was super excited, but unfortunately I'm extremely sad to say, I got bored.
Originally posted by: Chrono
how sad. it sucks?
Originally posted by: buck
Originally posted by: dudeman007
I was super excited, but unfortunately I'm extremely sad to say, I got bored.
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: buck
Originally posted by: dudeman007
I was super excited, but unfortunately I'm extremely sad to say, I got bored.
I think it's excellent. It now requires a lot more strategy in how you play. You have sprint, but it runs out, so you need to go from cover to cover. Guys are tougher now, so you can't just spray and pray. Death cam, or lack thereof, means you can snipe away and not have to move after every kill. Great sound effects.
BF1942 was revolutionary in that it included lots of varied and easy to use vehicles. This is more of an advancement in gameplay mechanics than actual content.
What's boring is Counter-Strike:Source.
Originally posted by: nycxandy
BF2 owns CS. No contest.
Originally posted by: Tab
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: buck
Originally posted by: dudeman007
I was super excited, but unfortunately I'm extremely sad to say, I got bored.
I think it's excellent. It now requires a lot more strategy in how you play. You have sprint, but it runs out, so you need to go from cover to cover. Guys are tougher now, so you can't just spray and pray. Death cam, or lack thereof, means you can snipe away and not have to move after every kill. Great sound effects.
BF1942 was revolutionary in that it included lots of varied and easy to use vehicles. This is more of an advancement in gameplay mechanics than actual content.
What's boring is Counter-Strike:Source.
Counter-Strike is MUCH better quality wise...
I need to figure how force it to display other resolutions.
Originally posted by: xcript
:thumbsup:Originally posted by: nycxandy
BF2 owns CS. No contest.
Originally posted by: dug777
No, it looks like ass (high, 1024, 9800pro) compared to farcry/hl2
actually i can kinda see how it could be fun, but still IMO the gfz need some work...
Originally posted by: dug777
No, it looks like ass (high, 1024, 9800pro) compared to farcry/hl2
actually i can kinda see how it could be fun, but still IMO the gfz need some work...
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: dug777
No, it looks like ass (high, 1024, 9800pro) compared to farcry/hl2
actually i can kinda see how it could be fun, but still IMO the gfz need some work...
Looks pretty sweet on my PC. 1152x864, w/ most settings on high, shadows off (due to the bug) and 2xAA
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: dug777
No, it looks like ass (high, 1024, 9800pro) compared to farcry/hl2
actually i can kinda see how it could be fun, but still IMO the gfz need some work...
Looks pretty sweet on my PC. 1152x864, w/ most settings on high, shadows off (due to the bug) and 2xAA
i guess i'm just expecting too much after playing farcry earlier, as has been said gfx like that are not really an option given the big multiplayer element of the game....
shadows worked fine for me on high (9800 pro, cat 5.6 at 1024).
Might have another shot now and see what i think again![]()
Sure it is. This is DICE's next-gen BF engine, it both needs to be able to support a large battlefield now, and last for the future; designing it around the lowest common denominator just limits what they can do in terms of graphics and perhaps gameplay. If someone wants to play BF2, they'll get a new card; you have to drop old technology sometime.Originally posted by: Lord Evermore
Abandoning a huge user-base isn't the way to move technology forward.