Do we really need guns?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
I hate to break it to you, but your Glock 33 in your waistband makes you and your family CONSIDERABLY more likely to be the victims of a violent death. I know, I know. You and every other gun owner thinks the statistics somehow don't apply to you because you are a responsible gun owner. Every incident you see on the news of a kid killing themselves with daddy's gun was someone who thought themselves a responsible gun owner, until they weren't.

Funny how you forgot to mention about the countless times of how good folks with guns were able to prevent criminals to attack them or their stores/homes such as the Rodney King riot, Katrina, Ferguson, Baltimore, etc. while store owners without guns watched helplessly because the cops were no where to be found.

I rather have it and never need to use it than need it and not have it. Don't want to have gun(s)? Knock yourself out but do not demand that I and million and million of responsible gun owners to give up our guns.
 
Last edited:

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,325
12,907
136
if we didn't have guns, we'd have something else. to say that no one needs to have the ability to defend themselves is to be completely ignorant of reality.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
This country would be better off, and the murder rate would drop DRASTICALLY if guns simply disappeared from this country. If it were that simple I would fully support pressing the magic button to make them all go away. There is no cost/benefit analysis that could possibly support the claim that firearms are a net benefit to our society, with the real human costs in blood far outweighing any utility value or vague notion of "freedom" that they offer us.

Now obviously there is no magic button, but a multi-decade effort to decrease firearm ownership in this country would be a worthy goal, starting with the serious curtailment in the manufacture of new firearms and restrictions on the supply of ammunition, perhaps followed by a long running gun buyback program.

Yeah yeah, I know. This makes me a freedom hating communist, even though I personally own 4 guns. I don't suffer the cognitive dissonance about the true societal value of guns like many gun nuts do.

So there are ~34,000 gun deaths per year in the U.S. The majority of those are suicides. Not counting suicides there are under ~10,000 gun deaths per year. Of those the majority are drug and gang related.

So you are telling me that if guns were suddenly gone that people would no longer feel the urge to commit suicide? Or that gangs and criminals would not feel the need to defend drug turf or commit armed robbery? Would all the violence in Chicago suddenly end?
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,550
17,072
136
if we didn't have guns, we'd have something else. to say that no one needs to have the ability to defend themselves is to be completely ignorant of reality.

What's equally ignorant is claiming anti gun folks are saying that nobody needs to have the ability to defend themselves. But again, gun nutters have never been about honest debate.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,550
17,072
136
So there are ~34,000 gun deaths per year in the U.S. The majority of those are suicides. Not counting suicides there are under ~10,000 gun deaths per year. Of those the majority are drug and gang related.

So you are telling me that if guns were suddenly gone that people would no longer feel the urge to commit suicide? Or that gangs and criminals would not feel the need to defend drug turf or commit armed robbery? Would all the violence in Chicago suddenly end?

If you were being attacked which weapon would you prefer to face, a gun or any other weapon?

If you wanted to commit suicide which method do you think gives you the best chance of succeeding?

You can claim the action/violence would all be the same but you couldn't claim the results would be the same.
 

SparkyJJO

Lifer
May 16, 2002
13,357
7
81
So there are ~34,000 gun deaths per year in the U.S. The majority of those are suicides. Not counting suicides there are under ~10,000 gun deaths per year. Of those the majority are drug and gang related.

So you are telling me that if guns were suddenly gone that people would no longer feel the urge to commit suicide? Or that gangs and criminals would not feel the need to defend drug turf or commit armed robbery? Would all the violence in Chicago suddenly end?

Isn't Chicago pretty tight fisted about guns anyway? Doesn't seem to work too well.

To the OP and others like him:
Guns are not the problem. Evil people are the problem.

/thread
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,550
17,072
136
Isn't Chicago pretty tight fisted about guns anyway? Doesn't seem to work too well.

To the OP and others like him:
Guns are not the problem. Evil people are the problem.

/thread

Yes and as has already been covered, the surrounding areas/states don't have the same gun rules which makes Chicago's rules that much less effective.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Yes and as has already been covered, the surrounding areas/states don't have the same gun rules which makes Chicago's rules that much less effective.

Maybe you can ban cars and public transportation next so those mean ol' people can't get to the guns and frighten you.
 

Venix

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2002
1,084
3
81
God you guys are fucking dumb!

Here's a fun fact: automobile related deaths have been steadily declining for years! Must be all those regulations they have been getting rid of./s

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_motor_vehicle_deaths_in_U.S._by_year

Similarly, firearm-related violent crime has dropped 75% since 1993, and firearm homicides 50%. Over that same period, gun laws have become significantly less strict, concealed/open carry much more common, and the total number of privately-owned firearms has more than doubled.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,001
55,425
136
Similarly, firearm-related violent crime has dropped 75% since 1993, and firearm homicides 50%. Over that same period, gun laws have become significantly less strict, concealed/open carry much more common, and the total number of privately-owned firearms has more than doubled.

Don't forget to mention the percentage of Americans owning guns has also steadily declined.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,550
17,072
136
Similarly, firearm-related violent crime has dropped 75% since 1993, and firearm homicides 50%. Over that same period, gun laws have become significantly less strict, concealed/open carry much more common, and the total number of privately-owned firearms has more than doubled.

Crime in general has declined during that period however if we look at gun related crime over a longer period of time you'll see that the overall trend is flat (with it peaking in the mid 90's and dropping after the assault weapons ban). Gun regulations during either time period have been all over the place. It would be pretty hard to conclude one way or another if more or less regulations was the cause of the decline.
 

Subyman

Moderator <br> VC&G Forum
Mar 18, 2005
7,876
32
86
My guns haven't killed anyone lately. I keep them under lock and key though so they can't get out.
 

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,973
6,338
136
I leave one of mine on my desk. I assume it hasn't sneaked out of the mail slot and killed people.