Why do you take the approach that people who disagree with you are less capable of understanding?
Not terribly hard to figure that capability would lead to already understanding the situation.
Why do you take the approach that people who disagree with you are less capable of understanding?
Not terribly hard to figure that capability would lead to already understanding the situation.
Understanding and coming out with a different opinion is a perfectly valid option too.
Just as you believe that overthrowing slavers and eliminating all the whites is valid given your understanding of the situation. There are some that may understand the situation, and find that it was inappropriate.
Disagreement is not the basis for which you should judge someone's understanding.
"Hey this person I caged up and treated like an animal just stabbed me, guess that shows who da Real evil one, lol"
Did not realize that children were caging up slaves. Who knew that raping women and then cutting off their heads was the only way to stop slavery?
"Hey this person I caged up and treated like an animal just stabbed me, guess that shows who da Real evil one, lol"
"Hey this person I caged up and treated like an animal just stabbed my kid too, guess that shows who da Real evil one, lol"
Keep telling yourself you da Real smart one.
Good job demonstrating that trailer park "Call me a slut, you whore, you're the Real slut!" mentality, couldn't have proven the case better myself.
"Hey this person I caged up and treated like an animal just stabbed my kid too, guess that shows who da Real evil one, lol"
Keep telling yourself you da Real smart one.
Oh look at that. So evil begets evil. Good thing evil was done to stop more evil, or else evil would be done. Flawless logic!
Tell me, what do you think of the Jews?
At least I know how to write "4th grade English" and not "4rd grade english". At least I don't label the WHOLE race (white) as murderous. Who could be that stupid and racist? It was YOU!!!!!
No wonder other members called you out and you labeled them as "klansman and friends". How sad and pathetic. Losing face in public. What a sad sad wumao that you are. Go earn your 50 cents. I wouldn't pay you 5 cents.
See, you just now didn't understand. I'm not going to use that as a judgment on your intelligence, even though you both didn't understand, and didn't agree with me, but rather take the opportunity to think on how I could have presented it better.
operative word in my sentence on overthrowing the slaver was AND eliminating all the white's. If you still feel that way, there have been plenty of rebellions where the civilians of the opposing interest were not massacred. Do you disagree with those instances of mercy?
As opposed to characterizing the white slaver, why not instead characterize some smart person arguing for the massacre of the children? That might help educate those that don't understand better?
Would you say you're that much better at understanding things than this guy, or I guess the jews for that matter?:
Notice it was cast as an understandable situation. Read that carefully, esp. the part where it says understandable, and take some time to ponder whether you understand the situation.
People who understand things can likewise see it as an understandable situation given the slaves might be under the impression the whites were only looking to put them back in the cage again.
They were French inhabitants occupying a French slave colony.
So they deserved it. Several thousand white men women and children put to death, regardless of their factual guilt or innocence. Because of their skin color.
And you again agree that this was a good thing?
No I don't. My only valid explanation is that he is confusing the rebellion with the massacre?
agent00f thinks its perfectly understandable if you understand it though.
The guy literally said the massacre of whites in the Haitian revolution was a good thing.
How exactly do progressives have such a hard time condemning this?
No I don't. My only valid explanation is that he is confusing the rebellion with the massacre?
agent00f thinks its perfectly understandable if you understand it though.
Show him a peaceful revolution and he doesn't notice it or he views it as a sellout. Some people really do just want to watch the world burn.
agent00f. heh. How many times has he alluded to how much smarter he is than you?
He wishes to pee on me from his ivory tower and tell me it's raining. I don't fall for that sort of crap, or piss, if you will.
I'm not sure that is entirely understandable. These were civilians, women, children.
edit: better yet, upon some reading, even sympathetic French were killed? Is your argument still valid? Or do I just misunderstand that a French person in Haiti at the time simply can't understand enough to be sympathetic. So it's understandable for them to be killed.
It isn't that he thinks it is understandable so much as he likes the edginess of it and how he can righteously call for murder which is romantic and daring.
Show him a peaceful revolution and he doesn't notice it or he views it as a sellout. Some people really do just want to watch the world burn.
agent00f. heh. How many times has he alluded to how much smarter he is than you?
Consider asking this guy who seemed to grasp it until a moment ago if he can still recall and explain it at your level:
Just wondering if your vision of a white country is supposed to come about peacefully? Easier with more of the obedient minorities I suppose?
Just a heads up that being dumb has serious consequences in these matters; case in point. ^
Hey... the forecast didn't say it was raining? Do you have tenure in your ivory tower?!!!! I'm outraged.
Would you say you're more used to the spoon feeding k-12 than college pedagogy?
Most people are. With the exception of probably professors. K-12 is like 13 years. "College" lasts between 2-8 years for people.
I can't fathom to understand things on the level of a professor. And if you offer that you are indeed one, I must fall on my sword and say that you have bested me not by the virtue of your argument, but by virtue of yourself as the arguer! I blame myself for entering into the arena against such a mind. You have my apologies.