• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Do conservatives act this way?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Any politician that did not bring about reform to help the common people, that persons death should be celebrated.

the death of Regan, nixson and especially gw bush (when he dies), should all be celebrated, as a tyrant has passed.
 
I assure you, both sides do this.

I was on a mostly right-wing forum in 2002 when Paul Wellstone died (right before a mid-term election). They had everything but a ticker-tape parade.
 
Then they were wrong as well.

Maybe or maybe not "wrong", but definitely the same. (Some feel that it's disingenuous to be respectful to someone the day they die when you were calling them names 24 hours ago. I don't agree with that personally, but I see the argument.)

When Breitbart died last year many of these same issues came up, and there was much wailing and gnashing of teeth about how evil the lefties were for trashing him. Yet ironically enough, he engaged in the exact same behavior himself:

Andrew Breitbart, a Washington Times columnist who oversees Breitbart.com and BigHollywood.com, tapped into the anti-Kennedy vein in the hours after the senator’s death was announced, posting a series of Twitter messages in which he called Kennedy a “villain,” a “duplicitous bastard” and a “prick.”


"I'm more than willing to go off decorum to ensure THIS MAN is not beatified,” Breitbart wrote. “Sorry, he destroyed lives. And he knew it."
 
It's difficult to draw a fair comparison, mainly because we have not had a President in recent times who has been as reviled by a large segment of the population as Thatcher was in Britain. There were a lot of people who legitimately hated her, who considered her the worst thing to happen to their country in the last century. Even for an unpopular president like Bush, you won't hear a huge segment of the American population claiming that Bush "killed" America, but that's literally the rhetoric used to talk about Thatcher since the 1980s. If an American politician comes along who is that hated, that loathed by a large segment of the population, I think you absolutely will see similar behavior. Respect for the dead shouldn't include lying about how you felt about them while they were alive.
 
So, when Carter dies, we should cheer his death?

Maybe you should read his Crisis of Confidence speech instead. Amazing how well it has held up and how supremely relevant it is given what has unfolded since he gave it.
 
People are not throwing parties because "the opposition" died.

People are throwing parties because they blame her for high unemployment and overall lower quality of life for the majority of the UK. They blame her for destroying the middle class.

Essentially, she is blamed for ruining millions of lives. If she is guilty of any of those crimes against humanity, then of course her death should be cheered.
Considering how during her tenure unemployment was cut in half (by moving people to employment, not the current American vogue of disability) and every economic class made significant gains, hard to see how that claim could be made with any validity.

So, when Carter dies, we should cheer his death?
I think most people would agree that during his Presidential term Carter was merely useless, not evil. Some non-Americans may well celebrate his death given that he made a habit of certifying as fair elections that he later admitted were stolen.

Both sides certainly make their snarky comments and have their ass hats, but only one side has huge, drunken street parties to celebrate the death of democratically elected opposing politicians.
 
Considering how during her tenure unemployment was cut in half (by moving people to employment, not the current American vogue of disability) and every economic class made significant gains, hard to see how that claim could be made with any validity.


I think most people would agree that during his Presidential term Carter was merely useless, not evil. Some non-Americans may well celebrate his death given that he made a habit of certifying as fair elections that he later admitted were stolen.

Both sides certainly make their snarky comments and have their ass hats, but only one side has huge, drunken street parties to celebrate the death of democratically elected opposing politicians.

This. Why cant people understand this?
 
She once said: “I wish nothing on my gravestone other than my name.” Even her name will probably not stand over her grave, for we know that she must have perished while fighting bitterly for England. We know that the enemy will be able to find a body in the morgue caused by countless artillery shells exploding in her brain, and that they may say that it is the Iron Lady's body, but we will not believe it. If the enemy says that, we will not believe it. That her body is dead we believe, what is mortal of her has perished, has passed away, but she has fulfilled her most beautiful oath, this affirmation: “The most valuable thing God has given me on this world is my people. My faith rests on it, I serve it with my will, and I give my life to it.” Her life is fulfilled. She began by fighting for her people, and he ended that way. A life of battle.

Now the world will attempt to explain her. Books will be written about her, some praising, others cursing her. People will criticize her, people will pray for her. A great one has left this world, and where a strong, bright light is extinguished, creatures suddenly appear in the twilight that had hidden from the bright light. That is all foreign to us, far from our way of thinking. For this we affirm: We who loved her swore an oath to this woman and her teachings, we pledged ourselves to her during our people’s dark days, we rose with her to the heights to which she led our people in the brief, beautiful years of peace, and like all good Englishmen and intelligent people, we stood by her in battle. The world should not appear small and shabby to us because the victors can rejoice. We can confidently leave her judgment to world history. We today cannot decide it.

But will posterity be able to understand her fully? It is hard for contemporaries to pass judgment about someone of their own era, particularly if it is one as unique as Margaret Thatcher. Posterity sees the great from a distance, reads her words, reads our words, but it cannot understand the world of our day in all of is breadth. One can only hope that they believe the great words of the great woman. “One could give me whole parts of the earth, but I would rather remain the poorest citizen of this state. — I am not so crazy as to want war. — I was a worker in my youth, and have remained one in my inmost being. — We are not fighting for theories, nor for dogmas. It make no difference whether or not we live. The only thing that is important is that our people lives!”

How will these words sound to posterity? Will they be able to understand why a whole people, in the midst of its deepest poverty, affirmed this woman? We may only hope so, for we know that world history will then truly understand this woman, her teachings, and our age. We see that more clearly today than ever before, we see it proven by the immeasurably hard battle that our people has withstood so bravely, we see it in the silent unspoken loyalty of the poorest sons of our people that Margaret Thatcher gathered as a lens that focuses all light on a single point; the most beautiful virtues, the most fervent desires, the noblest longings, the beautiful will of our people, the longing for the Right, the drive for social justice, the will for freedom, for clear leadership, our people saw that all united in Margaret Thatcher and her idea. That little minds darkened the image of his clear will, that traitors and bad counselors deserted and betrayed her, that finally she was overcome by a great superiority of the vagaries of our flesh, that cannot change the image of her that is in the deepest heart of our people. The present hour may perhaps dim that image, the enormous sacrifices, the sorrow and misery, may distort it, but when one day the senses clear, when thoughts are once again free, she will appear once more even to the last people’s comrade as she did in days in which the whole nation joyfully affirmed her.

The woman is dead. She fell fighting. she remained loyal to herself. Se wanted the best for her people, which is why it loved her so much. We know that she will continue to live in our land not as a great hero in the form of a metal statue, but rather as a child of the people whose pure will the people understood, and whose most beautiful words will remain a memorial for us, her words that in a people’s deepest need, one must love her people more than herself.
 
Last edited:
Damn it, nobody's supposed to know abo-

I mean, no. No I wasn't.

Perhaps you can post links to the celebratory street parties/riots?

Those folk in England, those celebratory leftist dogs, are actually conservative folk on the right. Thatcher was a socialist, a great leader as I eulogized above, and the only people happy about her death have to be conservatives or other forms of nutcases who don't know what they are parading about.

Who would celebrate Kennedy's death, he was an American hero way to the right of Thatcher.
 
liberals cheered when Reagan was shot.

Columbia University on March 30, 1981
A standing ovation. Wild celebration. High fives. Cheering. Fists pounding the air. My classmates were jumping up and down and hugging each other like they had just won the lottery. It was the happiest day of their lives! And I can’t forget the words wafting through the air in the midst of this celebration, “YES, they killed that bastard Reagan!”

http://www.bizzyblog.com/2013/03/30/students-cheered-upon-learning-reagan-was-shot-32-years-ago/
 
Back
Top