Do British Muslims really pose a threat to that country and its traditional values?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Alaa

Senior member
Apr 26, 2005
839
8
81
don't forget that If the thief is stealing food for his poor family he also cannot be punished because he will die without it and there is no reason to make your ppl poor and then kill them for stealing!!!(take third world countries for example)
Originally posted by: dna
Who's killing thousands in Iraq? It's Sunnis and Shiites, with lots of meddling from Iran, that are slaughering each other in the name of Allah. Get your facts straight about that, and don't blame everyone else for what Muslims do to themselves.

Israel is a much more complicated matter, but you can hardly claim that there are thousands being killed. Operations are aimed at militants, which, like Hezbollah, hide among civilians, or simply uses them as they have used children.
On the Israeli matter don't forget about Lebanon when they killed any citizens in their way to hezb allah!! I expect the same in dealing with Palestinians..Who ruined Iraq for their own peace? then left it in a civil war?
 

Rainsford

Lifer
Apr 25, 2001
17,515
0
0
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: Termagant
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: Termagant
What??? Bush was wrong? Muslims aren't freedom loving and want to hold hands with Jews?

This is not news. Everyone should know these facts by now.

Sixty-eight percent support arrest and prosecution for those British people who "insult Islam."

:disgust: Too bad I'm not British, otherwise I'd insult away.

Yes Jews need to feel threatened by Muslims.
Jews in Israel watch out. 20% of your population is planning a mass murder sphree!!

:rolls eyes:

WTF are you talking about? Which religious militia just launched about 200 rockets into Israel?

What do people have to say with the completely un-Western statistics from the OP?

You sound like a redneck who just started watching the news (FoxNews) for the first time ever.

Here are some facts to educate you:

1) The majority of Muslims are not from the Middle East.
2) Arabs are only 12% of the Muslim population
3) Islam says nothing about murder, suicide bombings, or killing of Jews.


to point #3. You need to re-read the Koran, for it does in fact say to kill jews and other non-belivers.

So does the Bible (if that's how you choose to read it) and the Koran ALSO says that Jews and Christians will be treated the same as Muslims in the afterlife (conflicting ideas, I know, but it's hardly the only holy book that has that) and that each person is entitled to his own beliefs and religious views, something I don't think I've ever seen in the Bible.
 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
Originally posted by: dna
Originally posted by: magomago
dna why don't you pause and look at the situation rather than invoke Hitler every second in your thread.

Did I invoke Hitler, or is this your lame attempt to negate my remark?

Yes you did when you referred to the Nationalist Socialist Party of Germany. Note that I did not attack your, nor call your comments "lame", but told you that invoking Hitler every second is a pointless act. You are trying to draw parallels between Islam and Nazism...and that is laughable.

Understand where you are coming from in history, because applying the laws of today to the past makes no sense.

What a long winded post you managed to compose, while I was merely pointing out the obvious message coming out of your compatriot's (Alaa) comments: we are ordered to spread Islam via Jihad, and we will fight you -- or as he likes to put it: "defend our right" -- if you do not let us spread it.

I'm sure he's not the only one who thinks this way, and what he is saying is no more than a veiled threat.

No doubt hopefully in the future people will look at the viscious actions being taken today that we justify and call righteous as barbaric acts.

So, you also support this spread of Islam by forcing.... ahem... defending your divine duty to spread it?
I don't need to wait for the future -- people are already calling it barbaric acts in the here and now.

Again, no. don't put words in my mouth. I never once said I support spreading religion through Jihad (if you understood what Jihad is, and the concept behind it, you would realize that spreading "Islam through Jihad" simply makes no sense).

You need to know how Islam spread: the violent period existed largely within the Arabian peninsula. Remember that the Empire that started there did spread like wildfire, but we are talking about the EMPIRE. The reason Islam spread so quickly among Greater Arabia is simply because Islam was in a position to displace other religions because it syncritized within the region . Syncretization is a process where a religion (or anything) can be similar to another religion and thus it enters and slowly displaces the existing religions. In general, this process takes bits and peieces and modifies the religion. Buddhism in China is an extreme example: MUCH of Buddha's original teching are far different than what the Chinese took and modified for themselves. In Iran, the concepts of ""Mullahs" was someting that exist before and Islam could not fully displace that~ thus while the Quran never talks about this elaborate religious heirachy, it exists nonetheless within Iran. Thus if we look at the area we can see why the religion spread so quickly: Zoroastranism had similar concepts, and thus the religion was one that already seemed familiar. Westward all the way towrds north Africa, Arius Christian thought was never fully erradicated by the Catholic Church and thus the transition to Islam was an easy one because of the position that "God and Jesus are entirely seperate entities" was easily able to take hold. Also, there were financial incentives to convert, and some of them related to the expanding empire. But to assume they converted BECAUSE of warrior aspect of the empire is false. I can give you a list of links, as well as books to read if you are intrested in learning more.
If we want to talk about Spread into South East Asia - a lot of this existed due to ecnomic incentive. Rulers would convert seeing the "power" and new allies they could gain from the west, and in time when the elite class converts the population eventually converts.
Regretfully, situations like the vicious rulers in India are NOT the norm, but thankfull the exception.

You tell me I talk a lot about nothing...when in reality you don't know the history behind things. If Alaa really thinks Islam was spread by the sword he is wrong:
The empire expanded (largely because empires back then were either expanding...or contracting), and for various reasons each region had its own reason to convert to Islam as the scholars raced with the boundries of the growing empire.

 

Alaa

Senior member
Apr 26, 2005
839
8
81
Originally posted by: magomago
You tell me I talk a lot about nothing...when in reality you don't know the history behind things. If Alaa really thinks Islam was spread by the sword he is wrong:
The empire expanded (largely because empires back then were either expanding...or contracting), and for various reasons each region had its own reason to convert to Islam as the scholars raced with the boundries of the growing empire.

If you think that I am saying Islam was spread by sword then you misunderstood me because Jihad was meant to make us able to spread Islam. When we control countries we can then start talking to ppl about Islam to give them the choice to convert or not and here we don't use swords..do you understand what I want to say? basically ppl believed in Islam without pressure but Islam wouldn't have reached them if there were no Jihad..
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: Termagant
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: Termagant
What??? Bush was wrong? Muslims aren't freedom loving and want to hold hands with Jews?

This is not news. Everyone should know these facts by now.

Sixty-eight percent support arrest and prosecution for those British people who "insult Islam."

:disgust: Too bad I'm not British, otherwise I'd insult away.

Yes Jews need to feel threatened by Muslims.
Jews in Israel watch out. 20% of your population is planning a mass murder sphree!!

:rolls eyes:

WTF are you talking about? Which religious militia just launched about 200 rockets into Israel?

What do people have to say with the completely un-Western statistics from the OP?

You sound like a redneck who just started watching the news (FoxNews) for the first time ever.

Here are some facts to educate you:

1) The majority of Muslims are not from the Middle East.
2) Arabs are only 12% of the Muslim population
3) Islam says nothing about murder, suicide bombings, or killing of Jews.


to point #3. You need to re-read the Koran, for it does in fact say to kill jews and other non-belivers.

So does the Bible (if that's how you choose to read it) and the Koran ALSO says that Jews and Christians will be treated the same as Muslims in the afterlife (conflicting ideas, I know, but it's hardly the only holy book that has that) and that each person is entitled to his own beliefs and religious views, something I don't think I've ever seen in the Bible.

And the right not to believe the bible and to even ridicule it in public like some do today, where does that right come from and should that right be denied on the grounds it maybe offensive to those who believe in it?
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Alaa
On the Israeli matter don't forget about Lebanon when they killed any citizens in their way to hezb allah!! I expect the same in dealing with Palestinians..Who ruined Iraq for their own peace? then left it in a civil war?

You really are victim of your own propaganda, you know that?

Ruined Iraq? Left it?
Last I checked there are still over 100,000 US troops there trying to bring some order, and to rebuild what the Sunnis and Shiites are doing to one another. However, I have the hunch that you are like Moqtada al-Sadr: blaming the evil Zionist for everything that happens there -- even the bombing of their holy mosque.

The US is still pumping billions of dollars into Iraq, so dont babbel about ruinning it, or leaving it. Besides, if the Shiites were to finally rise up against Saddam on their own, then you'd see a far more bloody conflict than there is now -- but I doubt I would have heared anybody in the Muslim world complaining about that.
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: magomago
Yes you did when you referred to the Nationalist Socialist Party of Germany. Note that I did not attack your, nor call your comments "lame", but told you that invoking Hitler every second is a pointless act. You are trying to draw parallels between Islam and Nazism...and that is laughable.

You are definitely bent on making that associationg between Islam and Nazism, and then attributing that to me.
I was giving you a prominent example from recent history where a democratically elected party used its position to dismantle democracy. I also mentioned Hamas, which got the votes because Fatah was so corrupt, and not because of their Islamic ideas; once in, they started eroding democracy by harassing shop owners selling alcohol, radio stations, etc. If you want another example, then take Putin in Russion: democratically elected, while eroding individual rights.

I didn't mention Hitler once, for the baggage it brings with it. I merely gave you examples of using democracy to destroy democracy.

Again, no. don't put words in my mouth. I never once said I support spreading religion through Jihad (if you understood what Jihad is, and the concept behind it, you would realize that spreading "Islam through Jihad" simply makes no sense).

That's where you fail to comprehend that I don't need to understand what is the "true" meaning of Jihad. I see what everybody sees on TV in the form of statments made by militants; I see even more by watching the clips on MemriTV where you have religious figures advocating for Jihad; the clips from the Palestinian Authority and Hezbollah also don't lend much credibility to your theoretical definition of Jihad.

Call it what you will, it is what Alaa said that needs to be done if resistance is put.


You need to know how Islam spread: ...
You obviously know much more about the history of religions, but I still stand behind my remark: what's important is how it is applied in the here and now, and not the theoretical meaning of A, B, or C.


You tell me I talk a lot about nothing...when in reality you don't know the history behind things. If Alaa really thinks Islam was spread by the sword he is wrong:
The empire expanded (largely because empires back then were either expanding...or contracting), and for various reasons each region had its own reason to convert to Islam as the scholars raced with the boundries of the growing empire.

I accept your argument about expanding/contracting empires, but, I still say you gave a historical perspective, when in fact I didn't say anything about history (Alaa did).
 

Alaa

Senior member
Apr 26, 2005
839
8
81
Originally posted by: dna
I accept your argument about expanding/contracting empires, but, I still say you gave a historical perspective, when in fact I didn't say anything about history (Alaa did).

Remind me of any true Jihad!! there are none in the present! even the near past!
 

Alaa

Senior member
Apr 26, 2005
839
8
81
Originally posted by: dna
Originally posted by: Alaa
On the Israeli matter don't forget about Lebanon when they killed any citizens in their way to hezb allah!! I expect the same in dealing with Palestinians..Who ruined Iraq for their own peace? then left it in a civil war?

You really are victim of your own propaganda, you know that?

Ruined Iraq? Left it?
Last I checked there are still over 100,000 US troops there trying to bring some order, and to rebuild what the Sunnis and Shiites are doing to one another. However, I have the hunch that you are like Moqtada al-Sadr: blaming the evil Zionist for everything that happens there -- even the bombing of their holy mosque.

The US is still pumping billions of dollars into Iraq, so dont babbel about ruinning it, or leaving it. Besides, if the Shiites were to finally rise up against Saddam on their own, then you'd see a far more bloody conflict than there is now -- but I doubt I would have heared anybody in the Muslim world complaining about that.

This is just my opinion as I see everyday lots of Iraqis killed! After the US decided to conquer Iraq!!
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Alaa
This is just my opinion as I see everyday lots of Iraqis killed! After the US decided to conquer Iraq!!

Uh-huh....Conquer....Then I guess they should just pull out, and let Saddam back into the wild, and everybody will be happy again.

I guess Muslim have an easier time bitching about the US "conquering" Iraq, than actually trying to calm the secterian violence, or sending reconstruction teams, instead of suicide teams.
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: Alaa
good but didn't I mention Spreading Islam AND protecting ourselves..see? there is a SMALL AND in between!
So, what you're admitting to is exactly what you spend all of your time now condemning George Bush for doing. Hmmm, that sounds about right.
 

Alaa

Senior member
Apr 26, 2005
839
8
81
Originally posted by: myocardia
Originally posted by: Alaa
good but didn't I mention Spreading Islam AND protecting ourselves..see? there is a SMALL AND in between!
So, what you're admitting to is exactly what you spend all of your time now condemning George Bush for doing. Hmmm, that sounds about right.

look at Iraq!! Muslims cannot protect themselves like this!!! ruining the other's country is not something we want to do.
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Alaa
look at Iraq!! Muslims cannot protect themselves like this!!! ruining the other's country is not something we want to do.

What the heck are you talking about?

I have yet to hear one peep from you regarding the secterian violence. All you do is perpetuate this bold-face lie that the US has conquered Iraq.
 

Alaa

Senior member
Apr 26, 2005
839
8
81
Originally posted by: dna
Originally posted by: Alaa
look at Iraq!! Muslims cannot protect themselves like this!!! ruining the other's country is not something we want to do.

What the heck are you talking about?

I have yet to hear one peep from you regarding the sectarian violence. All you do is perpetuate this bold-face lie that the US has conquered Iraq.

Did anyone say that it started after US conquest??
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Alaa
Did anyone say that it started after US conquest??

A conqueror in the sense that you're thinking would not be spending any money on rebuilding, or training local forces, or arranging for elections, or transferring control.

So, you are adamant on blaming the US for everything, right?
Muslims are really lucky to have Israel as a scapegoat in the region, otherwise they'd be slaughtering each other over minute differences in Koran interpertations.
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: 1prophet
And the right not to believe the bible and to even ridicule it in public like some do today, where does that right come from and should that right be denied on the grounds it maybe offensive to those who believe in it?
Definitely not, this country was built on having religious freedom. Freedom means "free", it most definitely DOES NOT mean free to believe the same thing that you believe.
 

Alaa

Senior member
Apr 26, 2005
839
8
81
Originally posted by: dna
Originally posted by: Alaa
Did anyone say that it started after US conquest??

A conqueror in the sense that you're thinking would not be spending any money on rebuilding, or training local forces, or arranging for elections, or transferring control.

So, you are adamant on blaming the US for everything, right?
Muslims are really lucky to have Israel as a scapegoat in the region, otherwise they'd be slaughtering each other over minute differences in Koran interpertations.

I dont blame the US for everything I don't blame them for anything!!
Then why Muslims wars were called conquests? even when they built towns from scratch!!
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Alaa
I dont blame the US for everything I don't blame them for anything!!
Then why Muslims wars were called conquests? even when they built towns from scratch!!

How did we get from Iraq to 1000 year old history?
You started this exchange by saying that the US ruined Iraq, and then "left" it, when we both know that's nowhere near the truth.
After that, you complain about deaths of Muslim, caused by Muslims. You blame the US for instigating secterian violence (you have yet to explain how), while conveniently ignoring the hundreds of thousands murdered under Saddam's rule.
 

Alaa

Senior member
Apr 26, 2005
839
8
81
Originally posted by: dna
Originally posted by: Alaa
I dont blame the US for everything I don't blame them for anything!!
Then why Muslims wars were called conquests? even when they built towns from scratch!!

How did we get from Iraq to 1000 year old history?
You started this exchange by saying that the US ruined Iraq, and then "left" it, when we both know that's nowhere near the truth.
After that, you complain about deaths of Muslim, caused by Muslims. You blame the US for instigating secterian violence (you have yet to explain how), while conveniently ignoring the hundreds of thousands murdered under Saddam's rule.

does "securing yourselves" contain attacking anyone who kills thousands? does that make you afraid? he kills his ppl is this related to you? It is wrong but is it related to you?
people are still people and there is no problem in getting history in our topic! as long as our wars are claimed to be destructive! look at yourselves first before you look at others!
As I said where was this violence before the US shows up? It's their fault that they kill each other but it was the US that gave them the chance!
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Alaa
does "securing yourselves" contain attacking anyone who kills thousands? does that make you afraid? he kills his ppl is this related to you? It is wrong but is it related to you?

I think you are answering someone else, since I never used those words.
As for Iraq, I always thought that it wasn't a smart thing to do. However, from what I know, Saddam's kids were rather crazy, so if they were to take over, I doubt the Shiias (or any oppoosition) would have an easier life, so you do need to keep that in mind.

As I said where was this violence before the US shows up? It's their fault that they kill each other but it was the US that gave them the chance!

That is just a pathetic argument -- by your own words you admit that they had this grudge for one another, so at one point or another they would've went at each other's throat. The US is just a convenient excuse for you, and for the rest of the Muslim for not having to do anything about it -- that's right, you've yet to address the fact that there hasn't been any pressure on both sides to stop the violence, while, in fact, Iran has been doing its best to fan the flames.

Let me know when Indonesia, Malaysia, Syria, Egypt, or any other Muslim country does anything concrete to improve the situation; so far, the majority of countries making a real effort for reconstructing Iraq are the Western ones.
 

Alaa

Senior member
Apr 26, 2005
839
8
81
Originally posted by: dna
That is just a pathetic argument -- by your own words you admit that they had this grudge for one another, so at one point or another they would've went at each other's throat. The US is just a convenient excuse for you, and for the rest of the Muslim for not having to do anything about it -- that's right, you've yet to address the fact that there hasn't been any pressure on both sides to stop the violence, while, in fact, Iran has been doing its best to fan the flames.

Let me know when Indonesia, Malaysia, Syria, Egypt, or any other Muslim country does anything concrete to improve the situation; so far, the majority of countries making a real effort for reconstructing Iraq are the Western ones.

I didn't say that the US should be blamed for everything but they played a big role here! if they didn't start this fake securing war nothing would have started. True we are also faulty for not getting into the conflict! but I have no control over this!
 

imported_dna

Golden Member
Aug 14, 2006
1,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Alaa
I didn't say that the US should be blamed for everything but they played a big role here! if they didn't start this fake securing war nothing would have started. True we are also faulty for not getting into the conflict! but I have no control over this!

When Saddam was executing hundreds of thousands -- you had no control.
When the US took out Saddam and called for countries to provide support in rebuilding and securing Iraq --- you had no control.
Gotcha!!

Why don't you tell us who has control?

(btw, if things were left as they were, then I'm sure Saddam would've taken care of many more thousands in the opposition, so it's not as if Iraq was utopia)
 

Alaa

Senior member
Apr 26, 2005
839
8
81
Originally posted by: dna
Originally posted by: Alaa
I didn't say that the US should be blamed for everything but they played a big role here! if they didn't start this fake securing war nothing would have started. True we are also faulty for not getting into the conflict! but I have no control over this!

When Saddam was executing hundreds of thousands -- you had no control.
When the US took out Saddam and called for countries to provide support in rebuilding and securing Iraq --- you had no control.
Gotcha!!

Why don't you tell us who has control?

(btw, if things were left as they were, then I'm sure Saddam would've taken care of many more thousands in the opposition, so it's not as if Iraq was utopia)

My president has!!
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: Termagant
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: Termagant
What??? Bush was wrong? Muslims aren't freedom loving and want to hold hands with Jews?

This is not news. Everyone should know these facts by now.

Sixty-eight percent support arrest and prosecution for those British people who "insult Islam."

:disgust: Too bad I'm not British, otherwise I'd insult away.

Yes Jews need to feel threatened by Muslims.
Jews in Israel watch out. 20% of your population is planning a mass murder sphree!!

:rolls eyes:

WTF are you talking about? Which religious militia just launched about 200 rockets into Israel?

What do people have to say with the completely un-Western statistics from the OP?

You sound like a redneck who just started watching the news (FoxNews) for the first time ever.

Here are some facts to educate you:

1) The majority of Muslims are not from the Middle East.
2) Arabs are only 12% of the Muslim population
3) Islam says nothing about murder, suicide bombings, or killing of Jews.


to point #3. You need to re-read the Koran, for it does in fact say to kill jews and other non-belivers.

So does the Bible (if that's how you choose to read it) and the Koran ALSO says that Jews and Christians will be treated the same as Muslims in the afterlife (conflicting ideas, I know, but it's hardly the only holy book that has that) and that each person is entitled to his own beliefs and religious views, something I don't think I've ever seen in the Bible.

where does the bible say to kill jews when the old testiment is the book of the jews? ever hear of the tora? thats the old testiment.

oh and yes the koran does say to kill jews, do i need to quote that part about looking for jews hiding behind rocks?

 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: Alaa
Originally posted by: magomago
You tell me I talk a lot about nothing...when in reality you don't know the history behind things. If Alaa really thinks Islam was spread by the sword he is wrong:
The empire expanded (largely because empires back then were either expanding...or contracting), and for various reasons each region had its own reason to convert to Islam as the scholars raced with the boundries of the growing empire.

If you think that I am saying Islam was spread by sword then you misunderstood me because Jihad was meant to make us able to spread Islam. When we control countries we can then start talking to ppl about Islam to give them the choice to convert or not and here we don't use swords..do you understand what I want to say? basically ppl believed in Islam without pressure but Islam wouldn't have reached them if there were no Jihad..


the choice to convert. hummmm interesting. so what happens when one refuses to worship allah? what does the koran say about that?

bible says to convert to save your soul
koran says to convert to save your life.