thescreensavers
Diamond Member
- Aug 3, 2005
- 9,916
- 2
- 81
The real question is why Obama would kill someone who had nothing to do with 9/11 without a trial.
Uh terrorists do not have rights.
The real question is why Obama would kill someone who had nothing to do with 9/11 without a trial.
You should let go of anger at some point.
OP, perhaps you should look up the history of trying to find one person who doesn't want to be found and who has people helping them hide.
Look at the stories about Jews who hide in basements and attics for years during WW 2 and even the neighbors didn't know they were there.
Nobody is suggesting they never stopped looking for him. The question is how much effort. We have no evidence Bush made it a priority, in fact Bush's own statement suggests it was not. Obama stated in 2010 hunting down Bin laden was a priority in his administration.
Osama made all those people look like amateurs. He had big bucks and so many hiding places and admirers they may spend the next 100 years figuring out how he lasted this long. He was a hardened combat vet known for being fearless and willing to sleep anywhere and move around at random.
He was also humble, soft spoken, and well educated. Too bad he was also crazy as a loon.
Tell me what Obama actually did that Bush did not? I am talking about specifics, not things like saying he made it a "priority".
Again, its not like he is over in Langley at the CTC saying "I want units there, there, and there" while pointing at a map. He is doing exactly what Bush had started. I give Obama all the credit in the world for continuing operations and providing the resources. The credit goes to Bush/Obama for starting/continuing operations, and credit to the boots on the ground and in Langley for executing the executive orders.
Tell me what Obama actually did that Bush did not? I am talking about specifics, not things like saying he made it a "priority".
Again, its not like he is over in Langley at the CTC saying "I want units there, there, and there" while pointing at a map. He is doing exactly what Bush had started. I give Obama all the credit in the world for continuing operations and providing the resources. The credit goes to Bush/Obama for starting/continuing operations, and credit to the boots on the ground and in Langley for executing the executive orders.
LOL Like I said in another thread "dead but not forgotten" ..any sociopathic loon with more testosterone and Islam rather than companionship and decentcy will find a mentor.
I doubt that Obama had anything to do with it nor was it boots on the ground.
Most likely it was someone looking for the money ala Saddam or we just got lucky.
When it is all said and done I doubt that any policy change made by Obama had much to do with this. UNLESS his stepped up attacks in Pakistan is related to this, which is could be.
And if Bill Clinton had made him a focus would could have gotten him before 9-11.When the President of the United States orders a priority in their administration resources are brought to bear (people, money, etc). It was stated in earlier post if we had additional resources we could have gotten him in Tora Bora.
Tora Bora was a screwup, no doubt about that. All I am saying is that both wanted him dead, and many agencies and the military were after him since day one. Are you guys saying there was a massive shift in how Obama was pursued between Obama and Bush?
To some extent we can blame GWB because he was a intellectual light weight twit.
First GWB promised the American people that he could immediately deliver Ossama Bin Laden's head, and when that proved easier said than done, GWB sent the mixed message that he did not really care.
But still in the grand scheme of things, neither GWB or Obama got Bin Laden. It was the dedicated work of military intel and special OP's that never gave up.
So on that point credit where it due. To the dedicated folks in our military who never gave up until they finally got their man.
Maybe we can say that it would better to capture him alive, but we will likely never know if that was ever a practical option.
Sent? No GWB explicit said OBL does not matter, not to mention calling off the dogs in Tora Bora or exempting Bin laden family from financial and banking or flight scrutiny,... was OBL skull and bones? You'd think so with latitude provided.To some extent we can blame GWB because he was a intellectual light weight twit.
First GWB promised the American people that he could immediately deliver Ossama Bin Laden's head, and when that proved easier said than done, GWB sent the mixed message that he did not really care.
But still in the grand scheme of things, neither GWB or Obama got Bin Laden. It was the dedicated work of military intel and special OP's that never gave up.
So on that point credit where it due. To the dedicated folks in our military who never gave up until they finally got their man.
Maybe we can say that it would better to capture him alive, but we will likely never know if that was ever a practical option.
How come they weren't able to get it done?
And if Bill Clinton had made him a focus would could have gotten him before 9-11.
Looking at the past using what we know today is worthless.
I doubt that Obama had anything to do with it nor was it boots on the ground.
Most likely it was someone looking for the money ala Saddam or we just got lucky.
When it is all said and done I doubt that any policy change made by Obama had much to do with this. UNLESS his stepped up attacks in Pakistan is related to this, which is could be.
Tora Bora was a screwup, no doubt about that.
Are you guys saying there was a massive shift in how Obama was pursued between Obama and Bush?
BTW Obama does get credit for making this happen now, no doubt about that. I just question whether any policy decision he made had a direct effect on this information or if he just happened to be in office when it happened.
