Braveheart
Member
- Feb 23, 2009
- 64
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: smackababy
I did not know that about the UK version. Only played the American. And I never said Fallout 2 wasn't buggy. I tend to easily overlook bugs for the most part. Story is what holds me the most, I can forgive most everything else.Originally posted by: Born2bwire
Originally posted by: smackababy
Originally posted by: gorcorps
Originally posted by: smackababy
Fallout 3 lost the dark, twisted, really do anything you want RPG feeling that Fallout 2 had. I mean, I had to install a mod just to kill children. Wtf is up with that? I enjoyed the VATS system somewhat, it was a little too non-turnbased for me eventually. Fallout 2, to me, is the one of the holy grail of RPGs falling just behind of KOTOR, but I am HUGE Star Wars nerd. As just a generic, post-apocolyptical RPG, it was a great game. As a follow up in the Fallout series, it was mediocre at best.
That plus your username means you're too fucked up for AT. Off to 4chan with ya
1.) My username is from an mc chris song, nothing to do with 4chan.
2.) It was an extreme example of the COMPLETE freedom offered in Fallout 2.*
*Not valid outside the US.
Only the US versions allowed you to kill the kids. They got really lazy with the UK version, they just deleted the kids' sprites altogether but this caused some problems because they didn't correct all the scripts to note the fact that you couldn't interact with the children anymore. I think this caused problems because there is one quest where you rescue a child, but is now non-existent. Fallout 2 is still pretty buggy.
Originally posted by: Dumac
Fallout 3 was simply mediocre.
Not bad, but not exceptional.
Originally posted by: VashHT
I couldn't stand the combat system in FO3. I loved the turn based fighting from the first 2 games, if they would've just added the option to make it full turn based (not the half assed attempt that VATS is) then it would've been a lot better imo. Overall I'd give the game a 7.5 or so, it didn't live up to the old games for me at all.
Originally posted by: Shadowknight
Originally posted by: TidusZ
Originally posted by: Shadowknight
Also, while I enjoyed the first five minutes after getting out of the Vault, having to walk everywhere got old REAL fast. It would have been nice to have fast-travel enabled for everywhere (like in Fallout 1 and 2) but to run into "special" encounters like the crashed spaceship, you had to search the wasteland manually (or reimplement the luck and wasteland survival skills so you can automatically stop fast-traveling when you get near a special encounter).
I agree with most of your other comments, but you do realize the game did have quick travel? You could click on the map and go someplace instantly. Please tell me you didn't really run everywhere you had to go.
I referencecd quick-travel in my post. The problem is, if you ran into someone in the waste in a random encounter and they put locations on your map, you still had to physically walk there the first time. Yes, you could use existing locations as "way-points" but even locations relatively near to each other took at least a couple of minutes of walking to travel between. If somone gave me a location, I'd rather have the option of just going straight there instead of walking there even once to "officially" discover it.
Same attitude I had towards Troika's Vampire : The Masquerade.Originally posted by: smackababy
I did not know that about the UK version. Only played the American. And I never said Fallout 2 wasn't buggy. I tend to easily overlook bugs for the most part. Story is what holds me the most, I can forgive most everything else.
Originally posted by: Sacraster
still like fallout 2 better than fallout 3
