- Feb 8, 2004
- 12,604
- 15
- 81
Just curious. I never played the original games ive only played fallout 3 and i thought it was really cool, the whole setting, the gameplay etc it was all really well done imo. So did the original community like it?
Originally posted by: Fox5
I loved Fallout 1 and 2 and I liked Fallout 3. That said, it felt more like a spin-off than a continuation. Not a bad game, but a lot of the humor and detail is lost. Bethesda games are about exploration, not role-playing, but Fallout 3 is better than most Bethesda games. It even manages to have some humor and detail in the style of the old games, just not enough.
Yeah, like losing everything in the trunk of the car when it ran of out juice :|Originally posted by: TidusZ
The people who claim Fallout 1 and 2 were amazing and Fallout 3 didn't live up to it are victims of nostalgia. They usually fail to point out that Fallout 1 and 2 had more bugs than a cheap motel. Nonetheless, they were great games, and Fallout 3 was a great game. Bring on #4.
Originally posted by: TidusZ
The people who claim Fallout 1 and 2 were amazing and Fallout 3 didn't live up to it are victims of nostalgia. They usually fail to point out that Fallout 1 and 2 had more bugs than a cheap motel. Nonetheless, they were great games, and Fallout 3 was a great game. Bring on #4.
Originally posted by: Zenoth
Originally posted by: Fox5
I loved Fallout 1 and 2 and I liked Fallout 3. That said, it felt more like a spin-off than a continuation. Not a bad game, but a lot of the humor and detail is lost. Bethesda games are about exploration, not role-playing, but Fallout 3 is better than most Bethesda games. It even manages to have some humor and detail in the style of the old games, just not enough.
For me the humor part of Fallout 3 is pretty much all covered by Jericho.
Megaton Settler: "Hey Jericho."
Jericho: "Get the fuck out of my face."
*laughs and resumes on exploration*
Job done Bethesda.
Originally posted by: erwos
I thought Fallout 3 compared quite well to Fallout 1 & 2. It's _different_, but the only real quibble I had was the total removal of all sexual material. The gameplay itself is quite fun, and the setting is undeniably Fallout-esque.
I am on an enforced FO3 hiatus... it will end when all of the DLC is released. Ditto for GTA4.
Originally posted by: acheron
Originally posted by: erwos
I thought Fallout 3 compared quite well to Fallout 1 & 2. It's _different_, but the only real quibble I had was the total removal of all sexual material. The gameplay itself is quite fun, and the setting is undeniably Fallout-esque.
I am on an enforced FO3 hiatus... it will end when all of the DLC is released. Ditto for GTA4.
As a female character I offered a male NPC the possibility of a threesome to get him to do something for me. Even if I didn't have to follow up on it, I think that counts a little bit.![]()
Originally posted by: zerogear
Originally posted by: acheron
Originally posted by: erwos
I thought Fallout 3 compared quite well to Fallout 1 & 2. It's _different_, but the only real quibble I had was the total removal of all sexual material. The gameplay itself is quite fun, and the setting is undeniably Fallout-esque.
I am on an enforced FO3 hiatus... it will end when all of the DLC is released. Ditto for GTA4.
As a female character I offered a male NPC the possibility of a threesome to get him to do something for me. Even if I didn't have to follow up on it, I think that counts a little bit.![]()
I miss impregnating both mother/daughter per Fallout 2.