Originally posted by: Coldkilla
You're honestly going to pay 600 dollars on a system that may preform slightly better, but cost 100s more, and have 10's of 1000s of a decrease in online players because no-one can afford the damn thing.
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: Coldkilla
You're honestly going to pay 600 dollars on a system that may preform slightly better, but cost 100s more, and have 10's of 1000s of a decrease in online players because no-one can afford the damn thing.
Absolutely because I plan on selling as many as I can on eBay for a huge profit.
Originally posted by: Soccerman06
Blame Sony, blame Sony, blame Sony blah blah blah, its Dells fault for not testing the batteries properly in the first place.
Sony's manufacturing process is at fault, but Dell is partly responsible because their design doesn't incorporate an active power management chip into the battery to constantly monitor power circumstances. Thinkpads do, they use Sony batteries, yet none have been recalled and you don't hear about them exploding. The active power management would completely shut down the battery if certain parameters got out of safety values, same with AC input.Exploding batteries are Sony's fault
Originally posted by: mpitts
Of course, Apple had the same issue with Sony batteries, but somehow the anti-Mac people here will find Apple at fault.
How? How can ANY manufacturer test for a part problem that occurs that infrequently? If you test 1 million parts and find no bad part, are you to blame for poor testing if the 1,000,001th part fails?Originally posted by: LoKe
The manufacture should be the one doing the testing in the first place.
You obviously don't know what happened with the Dell batteries.Originally posted by: dullard
How? How can ANY manufacturer test for a part problem that occurs that infrequently?Originally posted by: LoKe
The manufacture should be the one doing the testing in the first place.
http://www.laptoplogic.com/news/detail.php?id=1303Lithium-Ion batteries are constructed with coated anode and cathode foils separated by thin layers of polymer material, said Dan Doughty, manager of the Advanced Power Sources Research and Development Department at Sandia National Laboratory.
"It looks like a jelly roll. You get a high surface area with thin layers. The thinner they go with the separators, the more room there is for the active material," Doughty said.
The coated layers are wound up on commercial machines to create the individual Li-ion cell, and it's at that stage that contaminants, such as metallic particals, can get embedded in the battery cell. The metallic particles mentioned by Sony and Dell may have been cast off by those commercial machines, he said.
Generally, the polymer separator is very thin -- less than 25 micron (one millionth of a meter) thick. If that is punctured by an electrically conductive material, like a metal particle, the battery cell's anode and cathode short circuit, Doughty said.
He said an internal short circuit was "the worst scenario in battery design, because there's nothing you can do to control it," he said. In contrast, manufacturers have a variety of measures to guard the battery contents from external threats, like ambient heat.
Based on its conversations with Dell, Sony strengthened and reinforced the protective barriers and lining of their battery cells to address the danger of metal particles piercing the lining of the cell, Clancy said.
Originally posted by: michaelpatrick33
A wiiiiii bit away from death be they