Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
I respect Farve.
Originally posted by: bum
Do you think he throws those picks because he's lost his ability? No. He throws those picks because he doesn't have the team he used to. Brett would rather throw a 70 yard pass into quadruple coverage than give up and play to lose.
Originally posted by: cRazYdood
Brett Favre isn't holding the Packers back.
I blame Ted Thompson, and many years of poor GM moves by Sherman.
Originally posted by: kinev
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
I respect Farve.
I don't. :disgust:
http://espn.go.com/nfl/news/2002/0106/1306705.html
Originally posted by: bum
Do you think he throws those picks because he's lost his ability? No. He throws those picks because he doesn't have the team he used to. Brett would rather throw a 70 yard pass into quadruple coverage than give up and play to lose.
Nope
Before the sack that enabled Strahan to set the record, Green Bay Packers quarterback (and close friend) Brett Favre spoke briefly with him. On the next play, Favre dropped back as if to pass, then suddenly scrambled towards the side that Strahan was rushing from, abruptly diving onto the ground, allowing Strahan to fall on top of him for an easy sack. After the play, during the ensuing celebration, many of the Giants' defensive players patted Favre on the helmet. Many observers accused Favre of deliberately falling to ensure that Strahan would get the record.
Mike Freeman, New York Times columnist wrote: "Yes, Mr. Favre, Strahan deserves the record, but please, handing it to him the way you did, as if you were throwing change into a Salvation Army bucket, is the kind of mistake Favre may never live down."
The guy's a loser who tarnished the game by taking a dive. Real classy, there, Brett.
Originally posted by: bum
Originally posted by: kinev
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
I respect Farve.
I don't. :disgust:
http://espn.go.com/nfl/news/2002/0106/1306705.html
Originally posted by: bum
Do you think he throws those picks because he's lost his ability? No. He throws those picks because he doesn't have the team he used to. Brett would rather throw a 70 yard pass into quadruple coverage than give up and play to lose.
Nope
Before the sack that enabled Strahan to set the record, Green Bay Packers quarterback (and close friend) Brett Favre spoke briefly with him. On the next play, Favre dropped back as if to pass, then suddenly scrambled towards the side that Strahan was rushing from, abruptly diving onto the ground, allowing Strahan to fall on top of him for an easy sack. After the play, during the ensuing celebration, many of the Giants' defensive players patted Favre on the helmet. Many observers accused Favre of deliberately falling to ensure that Strahan would get the record.
Mike Freeman, New York Times columnist wrote: "Yes, Mr. Favre, Strahan deserves the record, but please, handing it to him the way you did, as if you were throwing change into a Salvation Army bucket, is the kind of mistake Favre may never live down."
The guy's a loser who tarnished the game by taking a dive. Real classy, there, Brett.
Actually, if you've ever watched more than one Favre game, you know the statement I made is true. In the hundreds of games Brett has started, you better come up with more than one example (from a unique situation) to back up such a stupid claim.
Originally posted by: kinev
Originally posted by: bum
Originally posted by: kinev
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
I respect Farve.
I don't. :disgust:
http://espn.go.com/nfl/news/2002/0106/1306705.html
Originally posted by: bum
Do you think he throws those picks because he's lost his ability? No. He throws those picks because he doesn't have the team he used to. Brett would rather throw a 70 yard pass into quadruple coverage than give up and play to lose.
Nope
Before the sack that enabled Strahan to set the record, Green Bay Packers quarterback (and close friend) Brett Favre spoke briefly with him. On the next play, Favre dropped back as if to pass, then suddenly scrambled towards the side that Strahan was rushing from, abruptly diving onto the ground, allowing Strahan to fall on top of him for an easy sack. After the play, during the ensuing celebration, many of the Giants' defensive players patted Favre on the helmet. Many observers accused Favre of deliberately falling to ensure that Strahan would get the record.
Mike Freeman, New York Times columnist wrote: "Yes, Mr. Favre, Strahan deserves the record, but please, handing it to him the way you did, as if you were throwing change into a Salvation Army bucket, is the kind of mistake Favre may never live down."
The guy's a loser who tarnished the game by taking a dive. Real classy, there, Brett.
Actually, if you've ever watched more than one Favre game, you know the statement I made is true. In the hundreds of games Brett has started, you better come up with more than one example (from a unique situation) to back up such a stupid claim.
I used to like him, too. But taking a dive to give a buddy a record is reprehensible. There isn't even debate about it. He did it! It was trashy and bad for football and I HATE how everybody has already forgotten.
And, yes, taking a dive is giving up (in a slimeball way).
Originally posted by: waggy
fave is stuck with a crappy team. but he is still a great player.
I would love to see him on the bears (yeah like that would happen). i think he would have a great year in chicago.
Originally posted by: udonoogen
i want to see aaron rodgers do well. he needs more time on the field, hopefully that'll be next year.
Originally posted by: ntdz
Actually, the Packers have a shot to make the playoffs if they beat the bears next week. The Bears might not care about the game and rest starters if they clinch home field...
Originally posted by: TrueEevil
I think he should stick around another year. His team is not very good, and he gives them the best chance to win. Sure you have Rodgers, but he got a chance..and broke his foot :disgust:
He also has motivation with all those records lined up. Call it selfish if you want, but I don't know anyone who would just quit if your that close to the history books.
Originally posted by: kinev
Originally posted by: SVT Cobra
I respect Farve.
I don't. :disgust:
http://espn.go.com/nfl/news/2002/0106/1306705.html
Originally posted by: bum
Do you think he throws those picks because he's lost his ability? No. He throws those picks because he doesn't have the team he used to. Brett would rather throw a 70 yard pass into quadruple coverage than give up and play to lose.
Nope
Before the sack that enabled Strahan to set the record, Green Bay Packers quarterback (and close friend) Brett Favre spoke briefly with him. On the next play, Favre dropped back as if to pass, then suddenly scrambled towards the side that Strahan was rushing from, abruptly diving onto the ground, allowing Strahan to fall on top of him for an easy sack. After the play, during the ensuing celebration, many of the Giants' defensive players patted Favre on the helmet. Many observers accused Favre of deliberately falling to ensure that Strahan would get the record.
Mike Freeman, New York Times columnist wrote: "Yes, Mr. Favre, Strahan deserves the record, but please, handing it to him the way you did, as if you were throwing change into a Salvation Army bucket, is the kind of mistake Favre may never live down."
The guy's a loser who tarnished the game by taking a dive. Real classy, there, Brett.
Originally posted by: ZetaEpyon
To be honest, I really don't think that Favre has been the main thing holding back the Packers this year.
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: TrueEevil
I think he should stick around another year. His team is not very good, and he gives them the best chance to win. Sure you have Rodgers, but he got a chance..and broke his foot :disgust:
That's because he knows when Favre is still breathing he's not going to get any sort of legitimate chance at playing. He doesn't take that many snaps in practice, and has had absolutely no chance at playing since he joined the Packers. We'll never know though how he'll do.
He also has motivation with all those records lined up. Call it selfish if you want, but I don't know anyone who would just quit if your that close to the history books.
That is the definition if selfish. Putting yourself in front of the development and future of your team. Making them wait and wait for your decision. Personal records don't, and shouldn't mean anything if it means you're holding your team back.
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
Personal Opinion to Follow:
Favre is still amazing. Packers suck donkey dick.
Originally posted by: herkulease
Originally posted by: cRazYdood
Brett Favre isn't holding the Packers back.
I blame Ted Thompson, and many years of poor GM moves by Sherman.
sure Brett alone isn't holding the team back but he's part of it. The Packers have no idea if Rodgers is their future or not. If he's not they can cut ties with him now and draft someone else. It doesn't matter how well Rodgers or any other does in training camp and on the practice field. As long as brett is still there, unless he goes down via injury, Rodgers will still sit on the bench holding a clip board. Imagine the headlines that we'll see if McCarthy tells Favre he's being benched.
The thing I hate most about favre though is how the media makes like he's some great individual. Boohoo, his wife has cancer, his childhood home was lost in katrina, father dies, etc. People everywhere has to deal with those things. But they make as if only he has to deal with it.
anyhow that's why this I love this espn article
Originally posted by: jlbenedict
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: TrueEevil
I think he should stick around another year. His team is not very good, and he gives them the best chance to win. Sure you have Rodgers, but he got a chance..and broke his foot :disgust:
That's because he knows when Favre is still breathing he's not going to get any sort of legitimate chance at playing. He doesn't take that many snaps in practice, and has had absolutely no chance at playing since he joined the Packers. We'll never know though how he'll do.
He also has motivation with all those records lined up. Call it selfish if you want, but I don't know anyone who would just quit if your that close to the history books.
That is the definition if selfish. Putting yourself in front of the development and future of your team. Making them wait and wait for your decision. Personal records don't, and shouldn't mean anything if it means you're holding your team back.
Another selfish quarterback is good ole boy Peyton Manning. When was it; a couple of years ago when he got that nice fat contract.. then the following year, the Colts just couldn't manage to keep E. James.. Well, a team player would have restructured their contract, so they would have been able to keep James..
Oh.. but hell no.. $100'something million isn't a fvckin'nough is it Peyton..
The Colts would have eventually won a Super Bowl, if they could have kept the big 3 intact.
Originally posted by: waggy
fave is stuck with a crappy team. but he is still a great player.
I would love to see him on the bears (yeah like that would happen). i think he would have a great year in chicago.
Originally posted by: Doboji
For the record... Favre is still an amazing QB. With the right team he is STILL capable of leading a team to the Superbowl...
Think for a second about all the teams that would be better off with Favre than they are with their current QB. Lets compile a list shall we?
Houston - Young QB, still has a chance to develop, get better, or even replaced.
San Francisco - Young, has shown drastic improvement over the last year, has a chance to become really good
Tampa Bay - They've been shuffling around a couple guys all year
Oakland - Same as above
Minnesota - Same as above
Detroit - Matt Millen - 'nuff said
Chicago - See #1/#2, he was even threatened to be replaced
Miami - See #3/4/5
Jacksonville - See above
Washington - *yawn* see above
Cleveland - SA
Buffalo - Losman has played as well as Favre this year
NY (Jets) - Jets are 8-6 you retard
Should all the current QBs from those teams hang up the cleats? Cuz if Favre should... so should they...
