• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Deadly Shootings, Explosions In Paris

Page 16 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
hawtdawg said:
This is spoken like a drone programmed by conservative talk radio. Rush Limbaugh makes 10's of millions a year off of dipshits like you.
Click to expand...

Which part? The part where his post idolizes ISIS and criticizes Christians for using the first amendment instead of intentionally targeting civilians, or the part where he claims that Christians won't involve themselves in military action despite the DOD statistics showing otherwise?
 
mrjminer said:
Which part? The part where his post idolizes ISIS and criticizes Christians for using the first amendment instead of intentionally targeting civilians, or the part where he claims that Christians won't involve themselves in military action despite the DOD statistics showing otherwise?
Click to expand...

Idolize ISIS? Get the fuck out of here. I specifically pointed out right wing Christians who hide behind the first amendment like you so conveniently pointed out and the US flag to wage their hate filled agendas and are just as big of cowards as ISIS.
 
5150Joker said:
Idolize ISIS? Get the fuck out of here. I specifically pointed out right wing Christians who hide behind the first amendment like you so conveniently pointed out and the US flag to wage their hate filled agendas and are just as big of cowards as ISIS.
Click to expand...

Oh, my apologies. I took your statement that Christians just don't have balls like ISIS to intentionally target civilians to support their beliefs alongside your criticism of their preferred method of using free speech and remaining law-abiding as your idolatry of ISIS in comparison.
 
Nebor said:
That's idiotic. Why would we choose randomly? Iran has had it coming for a while, and this is our chance.
Click to expand...

This is the problem with the war on terror since 9-11. Attacking people that literally have nothing to do with the terrorist attack. Or worse our target is also fighting the same enemy. You realize Iran is fighting ISIS? Now why would we go topple a country that is literally fighting the people claiming responsibility for this attack?
 
Genx87 said:
This is the problem with the war on terror since 9-11. Attacking people that literally have nothing to do with the terrorist attack. Or worse our target is also fighting the same enemy. You realize Iran is fighting ISIS? Now why would we go topple a country that is literally fighting the people claiming responsibility for this attack?
Click to expand...

Because continuing the endlessly profitable "war on terror" is the actual goal? I mean the cold war is over, how else are military contractors supposed to make cash hand over fist?
 
hawtdawg said:
Because continuing the endlessly profitable "war on terror" is the actual goal? I mean the cold war is over, how else are military contractors supposed to make cash hand over fist?
Click to expand...

That makes sense. But I dont think Nebor is pushing this line of thinking because the war on terror is profitable for some. I think he honestly believes toppling Iran will somehow send a msg to ISIS. The msg is attack us and we will kill your enemy for you! Brilliant!
 
Genx87 said:
That makes sense. But I dont think Nebor is pushing this line of thinking because the war on terror is profitable for some. I think he honestly believes toppling Iran will somehow send a msg to ISIS. The msg is attack us and we will kill your enemy for you! Brilliant!
Click to expand...

If anyone is funding them (who needs funding when there are billions of dollars with of US military equipment just laying around) it's the Saudi's.
 
hawtdawg said:
If anyone is funding them (who needs funding when there are billions of dollars with of US military equipment just laying around) it's the Saudi's.
Click to expand...

Absolutely. That would make more sense deal SA. Why? Because they support extremist groups. A sizeable portion of fighters captured in Iraq werent Iraqi. They were Saudi Arabian. How many of the attackers on 911 were from Saudi Arabia? 15 of 19.

They are also mostly Sunni. So they arent a natural enemy of ISIS unlike Iran.
 
Genx87 said:
Absolutely. That would make more sense deal SA. Why? Because they support extremist groups. A sizeable portion of fighters captured in Iraq werent Iraqi. They were Saudi Arabian. How many of the attackers on 911 were from Saudi Arabia? 15 of 19.

They are also mostly Sunni. So they arent a natural enemy of ISIS unlike Iran.
Click to expand...

They also directly benefit as the price of oil tends to go up when shit gets crazy over there.
 
mrjminer said:
Oh, my apologies. I took your statement that Christians just don't have balls like ISIS to intentionally target civilians to support their beliefs alongside your criticism of their preferred method of using free speech and remaining law-abiding as your idolatry of ISIS in comparison.
Click to expand...
That's not what he said at all. No honest, rational person would interpret his comments that way.
 
Only thing I want to hear out of Kerry's mouth is this line: "We will work with Russia to kill ISIS and to restore the states of Iraq and Syria." Because that's the proper way forward from this.

To end this situation you end ISIS holding territory.
 
hawtdawg said:
Yeah, so why is it that they don't attack China, or Brazil, or well, anything but western countries exactly? Never seen any of you Islamic extremist "experts" attempt to explain that one.
Click to expand...

Because they're spreading in those countries with little resistance. Look up 'cultural jihad'.
 
BxgJ said:
I'm glad you heard from your friend.

I do have one question - is morale that bad there now, that the country is lost?
Click to expand...

Yes, sounds really bad that you cannot walk down the street without getting punched or beaten up because you are an infidel.

Had no idea they let their Country get completely taken over including elected Officials she said that support that crazy Sharia law.

They have places that are in Islamic language only that when translated says things like we will conquer the infidels on the front of the business.

You get what you allow.
 
mrjminer said:
Oh, my apologies. I took your statement that Christians just don't have balls like ISIS to intentionally target civilians to support their beliefs alongside your criticism of their preferred method of using free speech and remaining law-abiding as your idolatry of ISIS in comparison.
Click to expand...
I ignored 5150joker after he called for the banning of all religions and then soon after claimed to be in the politically center. Guy is off his rocker.
 
hawtdawg said:
Yeah, so why is it that they don't attack China, or Brazil, or well, anything but western countries exactly? Never seen any of you Islamic extremist "experts" attempt to explain that one.
Click to expand...

Not in china? Really?

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-33251572

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/03/china-kunming-knife-attacks-not-global-jihad

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-atheist-government-bans-fasting-Ramadan.html

See below (post #400) for even more Muslims attacks on other countries.

Do you want more? I haven't start with attacks in India, Russia, and others. As a matter of fact, china is worrying about Northwestern part of Xinjiang and how Muslims in that area could be the next time bomb. For now, they only have knives and firebombs, just wait until those Muslims have guns and heavy explosives and expertise help from foreign war veterans.

Get out of that bubble of yours and live in the real world, ok?
 
Last edited:
Svnla said:
Not in china? Really?

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-33251572

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/03/china-kunming-knife-attacks-not-global-jihad

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-atheist-government-bans-fasting-Ramadan.html

Do you want more? As a matter of fact, china is worrying about Northwestern part of Xinjiang and how Muslims in that area could be the next time bomb.

Get out of that bubble of yours and live in the real world, ok?
Click to expand...
I think I knew of the first, did not of the second. :'(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top