Muse
Lifer
I did a search at www.pricewatch.com about 5 days ago on "Norton Systemworks" and was pleased to find the 2003 version available shipped for around $10, pretty much in line with this thread's title. I was looking for my brother because I was helping him over the phone to do an online order for a computer at Dell. The option to have NAV 2003 installed on the box was an added $40. I told my brother that he shouldn't get it since he could get it online for around 10 bucks.
I have Norton Systemworks 2001, and it seems to be all I need for my Windows 2000, but I multiboot and my Windows 98's NAV is complaining that I have to subscribe ( IOW pay money ) if I want Liveupdate to work on it. For whatever reason my Windows 2000 hasn't complained. Maybe it's because I did a complete reinstall of Windows 2000 and the NAV hasn't sat on it for over a year.
The only reason I'd prefer SW over NAV is for Ghost, but my brother's not going to get into that. I heard that Ghost 2002 makes you enter a password every time you want to use it. I don't have to do that with my Ghost 2001. Don't know the score with Ghost 2003, though.
BTW, folks, when you install Systemworks you should probably configure things so only NAV runs automatically at startup. Have everything else configured to run manually. This is right in the installation routine if it's like version 2001. Many people have said that SW trashed their Windows 2000 machines when configured to run that other stuff automatically. Maybe things have improved with XP, but personally I wouldn't take a chance on it without evidence that Symantec has improved things.
Another thing: When you install Ghost, not only create Ghost floppies, but print out the manual, read it and figure out how to make a bootable Ghost CD. Ghost runs around 20 times faster from a CD.
I have Norton Systemworks 2001, and it seems to be all I need for my Windows 2000, but I multiboot and my Windows 98's NAV is complaining that I have to subscribe ( IOW pay money ) if I want Liveupdate to work on it. For whatever reason my Windows 2000 hasn't complained. Maybe it's because I did a complete reinstall of Windows 2000 and the NAV hasn't sat on it for over a year.
The only reason I'd prefer SW over NAV is for Ghost, but my brother's not going to get into that. I heard that Ghost 2002 makes you enter a password every time you want to use it. I don't have to do that with my Ghost 2001. Don't know the score with Ghost 2003, though.
BTW, folks, when you install Systemworks you should probably configure things so only NAV runs automatically at startup. Have everything else configured to run manually. This is right in the installation routine if it's like version 2001. Many people have said that SW trashed their Windows 2000 machines when configured to run that other stuff automatically. Maybe things have improved with XP, but personally I wouldn't take a chance on it without evidence that Symantec has improved things.
Another thing: When you install Ghost, not only create Ghost floppies, but print out the manual, read it and figure out how to make a bootable Ghost CD. Ghost runs around 20 times faster from a CD.